- Moderator
- #726
No, just that he'd be very welcome back at Murch!
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
KDFL 2015
- Thread starter hank1
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
No, just that he'd be very welcome back at Murch!
I see Nathan gemmill already cleared!!!
My viewings from weekend
No lee.. Didn't see Kayrooz even tho he was cleared there.. Big man at Lanky getting beat and went down so did Meka. Josh Komi for us did a hammy late no Haysom (brother of) barbs best ruck in the comp. Said we would win by 5 goals and won by 22. Lapse in the 3rd cost us, pricey and shielsy cut them up. Very happy with our result with such little match practice.
Oh yeh and Paddy Rattray tore Lankys back half a newy
Although Lanky did show glimpses in the 3rd that their midfield can gel and work well together. Backline seems shaky though
No lee.. Didn't see Kayrooz even tho he was cleared there.. Big man at Lanky getting beat and went down so did Meka. Josh Komi for us did a hammy late no Haysom (brother of) barbs best ruck in the comp. Said we would win by 5 goals and won by 22. Lapse in the 3rd cost us, pricey and shielsy cut them up. Very happy with our result with such little match practice.
Oh yeh and Paddy Rattray tore Lankys back half a newy
Although Lanky did show glimpses in the 3rd that their midfield can gel and work well together. Backline seems shaky though
Last edited:
Just out of curiosity normo, when was the last time gemmill played. He didnt play last year did he??
Yeah didn't play last year mate.. Could of played a few the year b4 at Nathalia maybe not to sure tho..
asa
Very good assessment. Big Paddy is such an obstacle for back lines to get over. Although thought Orr did a fair job when moved on to him. 7 goals and a winning forward is nice to have. Will again look for a 100 goal plus season.
Snowflake32
Rookie
- Feb 24, 2015
- 36
- 14
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Who is kayrooz?
- Mar 28, 2012
- 2,222
- 3,610
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Pittsburgh Steelers Perth Scorchers
Cleared from VT to Lancy the other week
Taygen Sage
Rookie
- Jul 30, 2014
- 42
- 41
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Just another grub.
Taygen Sage
Rookie
- Jul 30, 2014
- 42
- 41
- AFL Club
- Essendon
I heard a Lancy supporter say after the game "as much as I hate to say it, I reckon we really missed Clarke (smooth mover) today". True Story!
- Jan 8, 2010
- 599
- 629
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Oh no. Must you report that!!! How's the wobble head going Smooth??
Snowflake32
Rookie
- Feb 24, 2015
- 36
- 14
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Any good?
Taygen Sage
Rookie
- Jul 30, 2014
- 42
- 41
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Only kidding about him being a grub Snowflake, he's a ripping bloke & can play.
Beautiful left footer, I'd say he'd be suited across half back but would be just as useful on a wing or half forward.
Snowflake32
Rookie
- Feb 24, 2015
- 36
- 14
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Never heard of him mate, is he a Melbourne bloke?
Taygen Sage
Rookie
- Jul 30, 2014
- 42
- 41
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Yeah he is a Melbourne boy, The Arkitect got him to VT in 2013 so has obviously talked him into playing at the Wombats. I don't think he played anywhere last year.
Sounds like he turned up a year too late.
Here's one for the academics. At the most recent KDFNL Tribunal a Lancaster and Nagambie player were both given two week suspended sentences and allowed to play this week. The bad news is this can't happen -
If the case is heard by the Tribunal or Area Appeals
Board and a player is found guilty of an offence
(as outlined in 1 or 3) the player may receive the
one match set penalty as a minimum (suspended
sentences can only be provided for if the one match
set penalty is applied - ie. player found guilty and
suspended for 3 matches for striking with 2 matches
suspended, player to serve 1 match).
Straight from the 2015 handbook.
If the case is heard by the Tribunal or Area Appeals
Board and a player is found guilty of an offence
(as outlined in 1 or 3) the player may receive the
one match set penalty as a minimum (suspended
sentences can only be provided for if the one match
set penalty is applied - ie. player found guilty and
suspended for 3 matches for striking with 2 matches
suspended, player to serve 1 match).
Straight from the 2015 handbook.
Great opportunity for the opposing sides to launch appeals if these blokes play and the sides they play in win. Pretty simple, all there in black and white.
Recent tribunal training session was held at AFL GM , who are administering the KDFL .
You are spot on , should not happen . Was the set penalty offered ?
- Thread starter
- #747
Spot on Woody. not a new rule either, two cases I know about, last time I had the pleasure of sitting in the KDL Kangaroo court in 2011 I was found guilty and we asked for a suspended sentence but the panel said sorry but our hands are tied, once found guilty you must receive at a minimum the set penalty for the offence (1 week). In another case in the GV, think from memory it was Tim Looby, was found guilty but given a reprimand, a couple of days later this ruling was brought up and the tribunal decision was subsequently overruled and he was given a week. I believe this will now have to happen in this case also.
- Jan 9, 2013
- 2,189
- 3,122
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
spot on woody that is also what I thought the gvl tribunal also gave benalla gun josh mellington the same medicine a suspended sentence Martin Gleeson
had a bit to say about the matter in yesterdays shepp news page57
I'd suggest leagues would administer league independent tribunals wouldn't you ark ?
Everyone who gets weeks thinks they are hard done by, the verdict is debatable when it isn't in black and white .
Last edited:
- Status
