RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
From now on, until we finally have to get rid of Ken, this is how we have to describe him to the media. This is how i will describe him.
Like Kim Beazley - Ken doesn't have the Ticker to win the big one. Like Kim, he's a lovely bloke, capable, more than competent, but not leadership material to win you the premiership.
Dr Seuss game plan - its as easy as one of his The Cat in the Hat books to read. Chris Scott explained how easy it is to understand and pick apart.
BEREFT of ideas - only goes in with his standard game plan, but can't change things on the run, because he has very little ideas outside his set routine. Isn't a 360 degrees type thinker. Bereft is the best word I can think of to explain his coaching ideas.
So if you get a chance to speak or write in the media about Ken, think about describing him this way. Explain his failings.
His game plan has gone from kick it to the bloody shithouse and run forward to win the territory game, get it out of bounce and try and win the throw in, and we kept with that until 2019, then in 2020 it straightens up to become bomb it to Charlie and hope for the best from our small forwards crumbing the pack, who tend to worry more about defensive pressure than kicking goals.
Its not a high press, its an unnecessary high high press, so that when we play the good sides, and the heat is really on, they easily pick us apart, we get caught out, and they stream down to their forward line and kick lots of goals from their goal.
We have to bash and crash, get marks out wide and a long way from goal, its always hard work for Port to kick goals against the good teams, and no wonder our players are beaten up come September.
So if you talk to the media - ask them why their analysis of Port's game plan has as much depth to it as a flea's footprint?
Is it because that's how deep Ken is?
Ask them why do they want to boof Ken, have homoerotic feelings towards him, I know Jerry Seinfeld said there is nothing wrong with it, but there is when you are supposed be a well paid analyst of the game, and ask them why they can't understand the Dr Seuss simple game plan is why we fail.
Don't give them an inch for being lazy to understand the real weakness of coach Ken Hinkley - lovely bloke and all - but doesn't have the Ticker come September.
Like Kim Beazley - Ken doesn't have the Ticker to win the big one. Like Kim, he's a lovely bloke, capable, more than competent, but not leadership material to win you the premiership.
Dr Seuss game plan - its as easy as one of his The Cat in the Hat books to read. Chris Scott explained how easy it is to understand and pick apart.
BEREFT of ideas - only goes in with his standard game plan, but can't change things on the run, because he has very little ideas outside his set routine. Isn't a 360 degrees type thinker. Bereft is the best word I can think of to explain his coaching ideas.
So if you get a chance to speak or write in the media about Ken, think about describing him this way. Explain his failings.
His game plan has gone from kick it to the bloody shithouse and run forward to win the territory game, get it out of bounce and try and win the throw in, and we kept with that until 2019, then in 2020 it straightens up to become bomb it to Charlie and hope for the best from our small forwards crumbing the pack, who tend to worry more about defensive pressure than kicking goals.
Its not a high press, its an unnecessary high high press, so that when we play the good sides, and the heat is really on, they easily pick us apart, we get caught out, and they stream down to their forward line and kick lots of goals from their goal.
We have to bash and crash, get marks out wide and a long way from goal, its always hard work for Port to kick goals against the good teams, and no wonder our players are beaten up come September.
So if you talk to the media - ask them why their analysis of Port's game plan has as much depth to it as a flea's footprint?
Is it because that's how deep Ken is?
Ask them why do they want to boof Ken, have homoerotic feelings towards him, I know Jerry Seinfeld said there is nothing wrong with it, but there is when you are supposed be a well paid analyst of the game, and ask them why they can't understand the Dr Seuss simple game plan is why we fail.
Don't give them an inch for being lazy to understand the real weakness of coach Ken Hinkley - lovely bloke and all - but doesn't have the Ticker come September.
