News Koch blocks Tredders push for the board

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Tredders is pretty much the perfect person to have on the board - he bleeds Port Adelaide, premiership captain, great football brain, would want the position for club and not for personal reasons and most importantly has shown he will do what he thinks is best rather than just following the conga line.
 
Kock protecting his numbers. Gives him a chance to replace Cahill with a yes man with zero football experience.
May as well prepare ourselves for five more years of Ken.

Considering it is an AFL appointment, shouldn't they be deciding? (can't belive i am actually saying this) or does David just tell the AFL who to appoint?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

This happening is actually great if Tredders pushes it further. If Koch let Tredders on the board and then just ignored his input as he did with Cahill, he'd effectively be silenced by the need to keep the board looking cohesive. This might cause the sort of public spat we need to get some change.

A lot of attention needs to be paid to how our board runs and how it doesn't run for the members. Tredders has a golden opportunity here to strike a blow for us and to put a few cannonballs through Koch's bullshit castle.
 
His anti vax stance makes me want him more, he’s willing to sacrifice everything for what he believes is right.

He ain’t no scientist, but he sure as **** is a footballer.

Koch should be BEGGING him to join, if he had the clubs best interests at heart.
 
Tredders feels like an outsider didn't attend any games last yr. Was a glaring omission on Robbie Gray night.
Get the big fella in the has proven he will stand up for what believes in and loves the club .
 
That doesn’t make sense..

At first when you read we don’t want to pick club legends make them go through process etc it kinda makes sense until you realise they will be picking someone to fill that non-member elected seat anyway.

So don’t pick people make them go through members, except for the people you will pick who don’t have to go through the members?

What’s the difference between them and tredders?


It’s such an arbitrary line to draw that makes zero sense?

For non-member elected positions just choose the best candidate, if you haven’t even chosen one yet why have you ruled one out?


**** the afl for this crap, just let us have our club and elect our own board like all the other clubs get to.
 
Considering it is an AFL appointment, shouldn't they be deciding? (can't belive i am actually saying this) or does David just tell the AFL who to appoint?
Didn't he make some farcical statement at a previous AGM about his autonomy? Something like "I tell the AFL what I need to do and they tell me to do what I told them I need to do".

It takes a special person to make Kevin Foley look desirable.
 
Hang in there Warren, the members will elect you. We all like to point the finger at Ken but our board has been a joke for a while now, Cahill wasn’t the answer we were hoping for, ditto snowdon, Wanganeen lol but Tredders I have faith in. Pretty clear that’s why he’s been blocked.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
That doesn’t make sense..

At first when you read we don’t want to pick club legends make them go through process etc it kinda makes sense until you realise they will be picking someone to fill that non-member elected seat anyway.

So don’t pick people make them go through members, except for the people you will pick who don’t have to go through the members?

What’s the difference between them and tredders?


It’s such an arbitrary line to draw that makes zero sense?

For non-member elected positions just choose the best candidate, if you haven’t even chosen one yet why have you ruled one out?


* the afl for this crap, just let us have our club and elect our own board like all the other clubs get to.
Lol he thinks we are all ****ing morons
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Koch blocks Tredders push for the board

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top