Confirmed Liam Baker - Now a West Coast Eagle

Remove this Banner Ad

Time for some house cleaning.

1) Do not drag discussions or individual posts over here from other threads or boards.

Feel free to respond to those posts wherever they were posted, if you so choose.

2) Enough with the personal attacks. It’s a long season and this one may go the distance, so if you want to remain a part of the discussion, do it respectfully.

We will use thread bans and infractions if necessary.
 
Agreed.

Break the 2 trades apart and you get the Carlton trade being.

3 for 12, 14, Owies and a swap of later picks in Carlton's favor.

That's just brutal.

They must really rate Owies, or they got bent over without lube.
I mean, while he's flawed, Owies really isn't a bad player. It's just the fact we weren't offering him a contract...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Take out the Baker for 14 which is a slight overpay (I'd have had him at our Pick 17), it's the deal with Carlton that is a complete and utter f*ck up on their behalf.

This from the same idiot who traded 6 and 31 for Hopper. Tigers have gotten rid of him and replaced him with obviously someone far superior, which is a double win.

Should have just dealt directly with the Tigers and got 10 from Freo, for 3 and Baker. Forego Owies, and get a 2 pick upgrade on 12. It's still a shit deal, but at least it would just look like an overpay for Baker...rather than handing Carlton Pick 3 for god knows what reason.

I'll say it again. Clarke is way out of his depth here, and the WC media and fans are about to let him know just how badly he's messed up.
 
Agreed.

Break the 2 trades apart and you get the Carlton trade being.

3 for 12, 14, Owies and a swap of later picks in Carlton's favor.

That's just brutal.

They must really rate Owies, or they got bent over without lube.

This is the bit that grates I'd expect. Tiger fans have been telling West Coast fans on here for weeks, maybe even months, of what value Baker will get, but the way they've had to get there is brutal, and to be forced to give up the steak knives too.
Ruthless from Carlton.

Richmond did well, Carlton came in and nailed West Coast from behind, no lube applied.
 
giphy.gif
 
Dude, uppercut yourself.

He's going to have to win the Brownlow for fans not to want this campaigner sacked on the spot. Could've just requested Freo and the dumb****s in charge of this s**tstain of a club couldn't have ****ed up this trade.
But he's a lifelong Eagles fan like you. Would you go play for Freo if you could play for West Coast?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

They were pushed into a corner.

If they wanted to get Baker in, then they had to split the pick.

Once you have to do something, then clubs take advantage.
They appear to have gone into this draft and trading period with the primary goal of getting Baker in and everything else being secondary which, given the position we are in, is monumentally stupid. He's not that good a player to base your whole strategy around, he could have been traded for 26 if they had a spine, or walked to the PSD as a nuclear option.

The Eagles have been a laughing stock on the field but in the background it was always accepted they were a professional club that made good decisions and wouldn't be down for long. Now they are a laughing stock off the field as well.
 
Take out the Baker for 14 which is a slight overpay (I'd have had him at our Pick 17), it's the deal with Carlton that is a complete and utter f*ck up on their behalf.

This from the same idiot who traded 6 and 31 for Hopper. Tigers have gotten rid of him and replaced him with obviously someone far superior, which is a double win.

Should have just dealt directly with the Tigers and got 10 from Freo, for 3 and Baker. Forego Owies, and get a 2 pick upgrade on 12. It's still a shit deal, but at least it would just look like an overpay for Baker...rather than handing Carlton Pick 3 for god knows what reason.

I'll say it again. Clarke is way out of his depth here, and the WC media and fans are about to let him know just how badly he's messed up.
Not quite accurate

Clarke was never our list manager (the role he has at West Coast) he was our head of recruitment

Blair Heartley was and is our list manager who is responsible for trades
 
Can see why it was never given to Clarke
Understand the frustration, but in isolation the pick 14 for Baker won’t be a move you guys regret in the future
 
14 is probably slight overs, but compared to the rest of the deal, it looks like gold.

I can't help but think that Richmond could/should have been open to 10 or 11 + Baker for 3, which would have been a better deal for WCE (and even that WCE fans here were strongly against).
That might have been possible if Freo stopped dicking around with pick 18 instead of 11.
 
He's the one requesting a trade when he was a year off FA.

Dumb as ****.

Also, if he cared that much about Richmond, he'd have gotten them a better pick next year as an FA.
Dumb as shit when he got where he wanted to go a year early? Baker wouldn't have got us band 1 next year, at best would've been end of R1.

The only person that's come away from this deal looking 'dumb' it Matty Clarke for coughing up pick 3.
 
Understand the frustration, but in isolation the pick 14 for Baker won’t be a move you guys regret in the future
The draft is too compromised for WC to use top 20 draft capital on 27 year olds. Their fans are rightly pissed at the whole situation.

Baker for 14 in isolation is probably a slight overpay IMO, the fact he's out of contract makes it worse, the fact WC are where they are makes it terrible.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Confirmed Liam Baker - Now a West Coast Eagle

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top