Traded Lloyd Meek - [Traded with F2 (Dogs) to Hawthorn for Jaeger O'Meara and F4]

Remove this Banner Ad

Winning the Sandover does not prove he is a bloody good AFL player.

Also suggesting he is a walk up start at 16 clubs is funny

You haven’t watched any footage of him obviously. Dominates at wafl level. There is only 3-4 clubs in the league who I would classify as “happy” with their ruck situation. Every other club would at least take a look.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

This is a common proclamation I read on this board from Freo fans
You haven’t watched any footage of him obviously.
But after reading the past page or so about Reeves I can say without a doubt.
You haven’t watched any footage of him obviously.
 
You haven’t watched any footage of him obviously. Dominates at wafl level. There is only 3-4 clubs in the league who I would classify as “happy” with their ruck situation. Every other club would at least take a look.
I am sorry but dominating at lower levels does not guarantee anything at AFL level, that goes for all state leagues.

I am sure most clubs would take a look at him, that is very different to being a walk up best 22 at 16 clubs.
 
You haven’t watched any footage of him obviously. Dominates at wafl level. There is only 3-4 clubs in the league who I would classify as “happy” with their ruck situation. Every other club would at least take a look.

3-4 clubs happy? Gee-Syd-Melb-Freo-Bris-Dogs-Blues-Saints-Suns-Crows-Bombers would all be happy enough. Pies have Cameron/Cox and don't seem fussed losing Grundy. Richmond can probably deal with Nankervis for a while and have Soldo who is another Meek. Power have Lycett and had Finlayson being effective around the ground. Giants not great but have Preuss/Flynn that are similar to Meek. That's 15 clubs who have no real need for Meek. Sure, some might "take a look" as a decent backup, but that doesn't present Meek much upside from his current situation.

WC are stuffed but they are rolling the dice with Naitanui. There could be room for Meek at North with Goldstein near the cliff, but they still have Xerri/CCJ who are about the same as Meek. Hawthorn is really the only club that would want him because they might play 2 x rucks, and even if they don't then overtaking Reeves is Meek's best bet to be a #1 ruck.

Hawthorn have pick 49 and if they are keeping Brockman, then there is no reason to think the trade should be anything other than 49. If he was out of contract it would probably be pick 61. The only question is whether Freo want to be good samaritans, or keep him for another year as insurance for Darcy. I would do the latter.
 
… and the circle spins again.. 🤦
carousel_header-compressed_-_1140x641.jpeg
 
If big meeky wins the sandover as a ruckman then you will pay overs

As it stands we probs take the unders something like 49 and a swap of our future 4ths
The Sandover changes nothing, his season was his season whether it ends up with an award will not change his value.

I am fairly certain the Hawks will not be paying overs for him, if Freo decide to hold him that is fair enough and they can do that. But the club is in no position to overpay for a fringe ruckmen even if it is one with some talent.
 
This is a common proclamation I read on this board from Freo fans

But after reading the past page or so about Reeves I can say without a doubt.
You got me. I'm not even sure he's a real player to be honest. But clearly Meek is better since you're mob are chasing him.
 
The Sandover changes nothing, his season was his season whether it ends up with an award will not change his value.

I am fairly certain the Hawks will not be paying overs for him, if Freo decide to hold him that is fair enough and they can do that. But the club is in no position to overpay for a fringe ruckmen even if it is one with some talent.
Winning a sandover from the ruck while missing games is an incredible achievement

His value would rocket, others would get interested and we wouldn't take unders in that specific scenario
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Winning a sandover from the ruck while missing games is an incredible achievement

His value would rocket, others would get interested and we wouldn't take unders in that specific scenario
Being clearly better than WAFL players will not sky rocket his value.

Also again you think list managers are not watching WAFL games? They know what he can do already whether he gets an award at state level will do nothing for this value.
 
The Sandover changes nothing, his season was his season whether it ends up with an award will not change his value.

I am fairly certain the Hawks will not be paying overs for him, if Freo decide to hold him that is fair enough and they can do that. But the club is in no position to overpay for a fringe ruckmen even if it is one with some talent.
Why are the Hawks chasing him?

Pick 49 is such a crap pick, especially for list that has enough young players.
 
Why are the Hawks chasing him?

Pick 49 is such a crap pick, especially for list that has enough young players.
Becuase we have 1 proven quality ruckmen on our list, we were forced to use Kozi in the ruck at times this year when injuries happened. Meek will create competition for that spot and depth.

Also why do people talk like it has to be just 49? swap of future picks could be involved somewhere as well if 49 isn't enough. Freo may not use 49 but it could be part of either trading for Jackson or trading back in to the Draft if Jackson uses a lot of the Dockers draft hand.
 
Becuase we have 1 proven quality ruckmen on our list, we were forced to use Kozi in the ruck at times this year when injuries happened. Meek will create competition for that spot and depth.

Also why do people talk like it has to be just 49? swap of future picks could be involved somewhere as well if 49 isn't enough. Freo may not use 49 but it could be part of either trading for Jackson or trading back in to the Draft if Jackson uses a lot of the Dockers draft hand.
Melbourne don't want or need pick 49.

Swapping picks should be look at for sure.

I am ok with Meek + Fremantle F3 for Hawthorn F2.

Hawks could trade picks 24 F3 to the Suns 31,34

Keep 31 and trade 34 for Meek.
 
Melbourne don't want or need pick 49.

Swapping picks should be look at for sure.

I am ok with Meek + Fremantle F3 for Hawthorn F2.

Hawks could trade picks 24 F3 to the Suns 31,34

Keep 31 and trade 34 for Meek.
Not interested in moving back our 2nd round picks this year or next, we are looking to add picks inside 25 not lose them.

Again so many deals will be made during trade period you would be able to use the currency without directly going to the draft with it.

If he is THAT talented Freo will hold him i guess and we move on, but if we use any second round picks to secure a depth ruckmen i think the members will be rather pissed.
 
Not interested in moving back our 2nd round picks this year or next, we are looking to add picks inside 25 not lose them.

Again so many deals will be made during trade period you would be able to use the currency without directly going to the draft with it.

If he is THAT talented Freo will hold him i guess and we move on, but if we use any second round picks to secure a depth ruckmen i think the members will be rather pissed.
Come back to us next year and trade a third round pick.

We will have him for ruck insurance for one year and get the same result.

He isn't on big money, so it won't hurt cap wise.
 
Come back to us next year and trade a third round pick.

We will have him for ruck insurance for one year and get the same result.

He isn't on big money, so it won't hurt cap wise.
Okay that is fine, i hope that is what the club does if Freo want anything more than 49 and a swap of thirds or something to that effect.

Don't blame them for it but also not paying anything extra.
 
Okay that is fine, i hope that is what the club does if Freo want anything more than 49 and a swap of thirds or something to that effect.

Don't blame them for it but also not paying anything extra.
That's fair enough.

I am still very surprised Meek requested the Hawks considering trade assets. 24 is too much and 49 is too little. or F2 is too much and F3 is too little.
 
That's fair enough.

I am still very surprised Meek requested the Hawks considering trade assets. 24 is too much and 49 is too little. or F2 is too much and F3 is too little.
True but i still think it gets done (assuming Freo are willing to entertain letting him go).

We will lose Mitchell to Collingwood most likely, Gunston to Brisbane most likely (will get very very little for this one)

That plus our current draft hand gives us enough options i think to facilitate a trade in some way.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Lloyd Meek - [Traded with F2 (Dogs) to Hawthorn for Jaeger O'Meara and F4]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top