Thought i would take this opportunity to state some actual facts!It all depends really... I have heard that Lara and Geelong West have said that they aren't going to share their profits from the gate, canteen, bar etc with the other clubs who play there, even if they are named as the 'home team'. On the other hand, Colac have said that every second week they will share their profits with both home and away sides.
If this is the situation, then I'm sure West will be able to afford the watering program that they have in mind. Maybe even ask for more money from their past players....
1) To install 2 tanks, plumb them to sprinklers, continually fill will imported water as West has done costs over $40,000.
2) Yes, west did talk to Joeys and Newtown about making a small payment towards the initial outlay, however
3) If these clubs did contribute they were basically going to be allowed tenant rights until their grounds were right. Tenant rights included complete gate, beer booth and canteen takings on their 'home' games.
Obviously both clubs refused, possibly in the hope they would get help from elsewhere. Now neither club has their ground on the list from council to be fixed. These clubs will be looking for somewhere to play.
The question i ask is why should clubs like West and Lara who have fronted costs themselves be expected to allow other clubs to use their facilities without helping with the cost? Also, why do some clubs think they have a right to expect clubs to help them by allowing them somewhere to play, when they dont help themselves!