Autopsy Loss to Sydney - quite literally no words will adequately sum this up

[Roosurgence]

I was actually thinking about that inc

Yeah out of common decency they probably should. But the interchange official will get a big pat on the back by the AFL and its whores in the media for following the rules. And the interchange stewards union will have a nice old laugh as they finally got their ‘gotcha‘ moment.

You would think commonsense would dictate that the interchange steward would have said you can’t make the change you are at the cap, especially since they have to approve they are notified of the players interchanging.

Also if it comes out that the free kick was delayed and only paid when inside Sydney’s 50 pretty much sums up how shonky the AFL is when it comes to integrity.

 

[danj]

If it’s possible to win the match but lose the game then that’s what happened

 

[Ashley B]

It’s just ironic the olde SS are somehow often involved in these things .Ask ESS. Rich. Eagles and so on

 

[giantroo]

 

[cznsnowy91]

Papaley was nowhere near it. The North player was the one who had to deviate to get ball
Leigh Fisher is a ******* imbecile.

Yeah I went back and watched to double check, would have been an uncontested mark with Papley quite far behind and our guy had to dodge out of the way. Even worse than I thought then.

 

[Roosurgence]

So on Fox Footy they just said the infringement happened 40 seconds before the free kick was awarded. The free kick is given at the next available stop in play. So isn't it a free kick and 50 from the interchange gate rather than from wherever the ball happens to be 40 seconds later?

What a farce. So if there is no stop in play then the free kick isn’t awarded?

The played should be stoped at the time of infringement not the next stop play.

Looking at the vision it happened after the Heeney goal, so it should have been a free and 50 from the centre bounce.

Not only have they waited to give them a shot on the goal line, but they have deprived us of time to score by letting play continue and then awarding a free kick.

What a farce.

Also what is farcical is the Dane Rampe was the one alerting the interchange official, how does he have a count to know that quickly.

Stinks all round the way this played out.

 

[Ischenko]

I'm just saying it's not hard to count your interchanges.

Stop relying to me. You’re a miserable campaigner that lurks around this site like a seedy campaigner in a stained trenchcoat wherever there is delight to be taken in misery. I don’t like you, although your life is obviously lacking in important ways. Now get the **** off our board and please don’t talk to me again.

 

[TennisPlayerAndy]

Yep. Right after the cheapest of cheap shots. Umps would find a 50m penalty for any player we did this to. JZ copped one mere weeks ago for being .2 secs off the play. This clown makes no attempt at the ball and it's just a free. The umps were absolutely s**t all day.

To cap off that shit sandwich, they paid the mark instead of a free kick. Can’t believe it wasn’t 50.

Atrocious.

 

[SaintersUnite]

Look at the positives guys, your young guys looked bloody incredible and this result gets you one step closer to Harley! So it’s not all bad. You might be thanking the umpires at the end of the year if you finish last on percentage alone.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[KangaRooster]

The boys should be so fuxking proud of themselves

 

[Marstermind]

We've had 6-6-6 for nearly 5 years and teams infringe that almost every game and it's just a warning. We've had the 75 interchange cap for a couple and no one's ever infringed that and it's automatic free plus a 50m.

Makes sense.

 

[domiroo]

Hmmm not sure throwing cups onto the field is the most healthy way of expressing it

booing the soft**** sook is though.

 

[hilly]

Stop relying to me. You’re a miserable campaigner that lurks around this site like a seedy campaigner in a stained trenchcoat wherever there is delight to be taken in misery. I don’t like you, although your life is obviously lacking in important ways. Now get the * off our board and please don’t talk to me again.

Love your work Alex.

On SM-S901E using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[KekiRoo]

This sums me up

 

[shintemaster]

What a farce. So if there is no stop in play then the free kick isn’t awarded?

Surely that can't be the rule... what would happen if play continued uninterrupted until the end of the game? No penalty - that makes no sense at all. Crazy.

 

[Its a Process]

This is guaranteed to be the next instalment of a rule change due to an incident involving NM.

If this was Pies or Richmond they’d tear the place down - expect a change in penalty relating to this rule very soon.

 

[leighlee13]

It’s actually the rule . Penalty for interchange breach is free kick and 50. The umpires had no option.

Surely a free kick suffices. I bet they change the rule to be just that not that it well help us.

 

[Hatchy1992]

Relax

Im sick of this. We shouldn't be excited for finishing last. We want to win...

Im sick of finishing last.

 

[Poopybum22]

So on Fox Footy they just said the infringement happened 40 seconds before the free kick was awarded. The free kick is given at the next available stop in play. So isn't it a free kick and 50 from the interchange gate rather than from wherever the ball happens to be 40 seconds later?

Wait that doesn’t make sense?

If the game was free flowing for the last 1.5 minutes with no stopping play, would it have gone unpunished?

 

[Tas]

It was a clear mistake by the person at the club who can't count from 5 down to zero. You are warned by the AFL, repeatedly, as you drop down 10 or under.

I think when you get the last 5 warning, you better be 100% sure when you put someone else on the ground. It is just too costly a mistake to make.

 

[danj]

We've had 6-6-6 for nearly 5 years and teams infringe that almost every game and it's just a warning. We've had the 75 interchange cap for a couple and no one's ever infringed that and it's automatic free plus a 50m.

Makes sense.

Would make even more sense if it was Brad Scott who wrote the rule during his tenure with the AFL

 

[norfnuffie]

I hope Aaron Hall

43

Aaron Hall

Age

34

Ht

185cm

Wt

85kg

Pos.

Def

Career

Season

Last 5

D

19.0

5star

K

11.8

4star

HB

7.2

4star

M

3.6

4star

T

3.3

5star

MG

268.3

4star

D

14.9

4star

K

8.9

4star

HB

6.0

3star

M

2.3

2star

T

2.6

4star

MG

268.3

4star

D

13.2

4star

K

8.0

3star

HB

5.2

4star

M

2.8

3star

T

3.6

5star

never gets another f***** game, was piss weak in that last quarter

 

[chickenonachain]

Got me ****ed why the interchange stewards wouldn’t just tell us we are at our limit and no more interchanges allowed surely that’s not to hard. That should be the punishment no more interchanges.

 

[Ischenko]

Love your work Alex.

On SM-S901E using BigFooty.com mobile app

Someone’s gotta do it mate.

 

[Jonnoo]

Got me ****ed why the interchange stewards wouldn’t just tell us we are at our limit and no more interchanges allowed surely that’s not to hard. That should be the punishment no more interchanges.

The last 2 happened at virtually the same instant