I think the AFL meant we wait until the free kick can benefit Sydney the most and then we will pay it.Wait that doesn’t make sense?
If the game was free flowing for the last 1.5 minutes with no stopping play, would it have gone unpunished?
As for the doctor infringement, you would think that common sense would have prevailed and if the doctor is in the play they call a stop to play instead of waiting until we kick it to a player so they can reverse it.
I also love in that last passage before the infringement that Greenwood clearly gets taken high, but it’s play on. Yes I clearly remember Sydney kicking a goal from a feee kick where no high contact was made.
This sport is an absolute joke the way it is run. You may as well say that 95% of close contests are decided by umpiring these days.