- Nov 14, 2010
- 46,912
- 54,340
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
HirdyLannisterWont be leaving. Will stay on a monster contract.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HirdyLannisterWont be leaving. Will stay on a monster contract.
Get out of a basket case a year earlier? Get his payday a year earlier?
The money he'll be getting from his new contract is unlikely to change in the next 12 months. He'll easily be getting band 1 level.
Maybe. Depends where he goes and what they offer.Makes sense. North would probably get better compensation through FA than what (most) clubs could offer this year though, right? People are saying LDU can expect offers of ~$1 mil.
Maybe. Depends where he goes and what they offer.
It never does.I think we'll keep him, but I don't have any evidence than wishful thinking. I think North would match anything a rival could offer. Whatever compensation we got in return wouldn't compare the years we've invested into LDU.
It never does.
We aren’t short on moneyGenuine question. Would the AFL step in and assist with "ambassadorial" payments.
North just can't afford to lose him. Especially if it's McKay, Zurhaar, LDU in consecutive years.
Makes sense. North would probably get better compensation through FA than what (most) clubs could offer this year though, right? People are saying LDU can expect offers of ~$1 mil.
Genuine question. Would the AFL step in and assist with "ambassadorial" payments.
And the age old question, where does he go? If it's someone like Adelaide, is pick 5-8 this year and 8-12 next year better than a top 3/4 pick next year? If it's a team within the 8, absolutely hold on.This may be true, but I’m a strong believer in the opposite.
The benefit of bringing talent in a year earlier and accelerating their development shouldn’t be dismissed.
It’s a tough one. I can see both sides to this.
I doubt it. And nor should they.
I also remember what Clarko had on the list when he joined.
Agreed. But, it is in their best interests North get off the bottom. I wouldn't put it past them to try.I doubt it. And nor should they.
And the age old question, where does he go? If it's someone like Adelaide, is pick 5-8 this year and 8-12 next year better than a top 3/4 pick next year?
If it's a team within the 8, absolutely hold on.
Agreed. But, it is in their best interests North get off the bottom. I wouldn't put it past them to try.
North Hold the cards either way.What is LDU's motivation for leaving this year, as opposed to next year under FA? Genuine question - it seems there's a lot more for him to gain by waiting a year.
Mate, I've heard North posters promise Kelly and Martin were coming. I'll wait until I've seen LDU's signature on paper lol
@kangaroostechno would have said it too if he was around in those days...or maybe he wasThere was a North Poster that said that that posters name was Groin guru
There was a North Poster that said that that posters name was Groin guru
Maybe. Depends where he goes and what they offer.
I doubt LDU goes because of money though. North would be able to give him whatever he wants in that department, he could probably write his own contract.
I think he just sick of playing in a losing team and North aren't getting out of this hole any time soon with Tasmania coming in. My view though, could be 100% wrong.
Why not take the money & go to a good team.
Look at Ben McKay, get the $ and has had just about more wins in 10 rounds than he did in 8 years previously. The FA system routinely tells us the better teams are generally the benefit of it. Can't see LDU bucking that trend, but again he could love the place and sign on.
Disagree that the Tassie team will hurt Norths rebuild. North will have access to a lot of top end talent before the draft is compromised by the Tassie draft concessions.
It’s the clubs that are in the older bracket in terms of their list that will suffer the most because that’s when they will be down the bottom.
Could you name me said talent that North wanted to keep but lost? How many?you guys can't retain talent, that is the problem.
I dont see North making any drastic improvement in the next 2-3 years before Tassie comes in and soaks it all up. You are still going backwards right now. The question is can LDU see that improvement in order to want to stay.
you guys can't retain talent, that is the problem.
I dont see North making any drastic improvement in the next 2-3 years before Tassie comes in and soaks it all up. You are still going backwards right now. The question is can LDU see that improvement in order to want to stay.
We should beat the Tassie curve. If gives our young players time to play 80 games. We should be on the move by then and to go through the crap they will in the next couple of years to go back to terrible might be a big ask.I doubt LDU goes because of money though. North would be able to give him whatever he wants in that department, he could probably write his own contract.
I think he just sick of playing in a losing team and North aren't getting out of this hole any time soon with Tasmania coming in. My view though, could be 100% wrong.
Why not take the money & go to a good team.
Look at Ben McKay, get the $ and has had just about more wins in 10 rounds than he did in 8 years previously. The FA system routinely tells us the better teams are generally the benefit of it. Can't see LDU bucking that trend, but again he could love the place and sign on.
How do you know what Saints are about to do, you on the board or got close connection to Ross or SOS?One’s been rebuilding and collecting talent the other is about to start rebuilding or continue treading water in no mans land