List Mgmt. Luke Jackson - Yay or Nay?

Do you want to pay the high price tag for Luke Jackson?

  • YAY

  • NAY


Results are only viewable after voting.

Remove this Banner Ad

So if we do land Jackson, giving up two first round draft picks and signing him up to a $900k p.a. deal for 7 years, it seems that Melbourne are going to use ONE of those first round draft picks to trade for Grundy, with Collingwood still paying a part of Grundy's salary (he is on $1m per year for 7 years).

How ironic!

Melbourne make out like bandits, get an immediate (better?) replacement, on cheaper $$, plus keep another first rounder to boot.

Meanwhile Fremantle give to Jackson, pretty much exactly the contract that Collingwood gave to Grundy, which has hobbled their salary cap for several years resulting in Treloar leaving etc. The difference is it only cost Collingwood one first rounder for Grundy.

On top of this prioritising Jackson means we have less to offer Acres, Lobb and means we have no room for Meek.

Yeah, nah. I'm not seeing it. Wonder how Darcy feels about Jackson's contract.
Where is 900k / year coming from?

Please don't say SEN or 6PR
 
So if we do land Jackson, giving up two first round draft picks and signing him up to a $900k p.a. deal for 7 years, it seems that Melbourne are going to use ONE of those first round draft picks to trade for Grundy, with Collingwood still paying a part of Grundy's salary (he is on $1m per year for 7 years).

How ironic!

Melbourne make out like bandits, get an immediate (better?) replacement, on cheaper $$, plus keep another first rounder to boot.

Meanwhile Fremantle give to Jackson, pretty much exactly the contract that Collingwood gave to Grundy, which has hobbled their salary cap for several years resulting in Treloar leaving etc. The difference is it only cost Collingwood one first rounder for Grundy.

On top of this prioritising Jackson means we have less to offer Acres, Lobb and means we have no room for Meek.

Yeah, nah. I'm not seeing it. Wonder how Darcy feels about Jackson's contract.

I would much prefer to keep jackson than have Grundy and a late first rounder. Kid is a weapon. However, he's only a weapon as a solo ruckman... not a KPF at all. So who knows what's gonna happen from here on in 🫣


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

Log in to remove this ad.


People are assuming because the club said that he has requested a trade home to WA that it means Jackson hasn't nominated a team.

Just like Gold Coast talking about Rankine wanting to be traded home to SA when he has nominated Adelaide.
 
So if we do land Jackson, giving up two first round draft picks and signing him up to a $900k p.a. deal for 7 years, it seems that Melbourne are going to use ONE of those first round draft picks to trade for Grundy, with Collingwood still paying a part of Grundy's salary (he is on $1m per year for 7 years).

How ironic!

Melbourne make out like bandits, get an immediate (better?) replacement, on cheaper $$, plus keep another first rounder to boot.

Meanwhile Fremantle give to Jackson, pretty much exactly the contract that Collingwood gave to Grundy, which has hobbled their salary cap for several years resulting in Treloar leaving etc. The difference is it only cost Collingwood one first rounder for Grundy.

On top of this prioritising Jackson means we have less to offer Acres, Lobb and means we have no room for Meek.

Yeah, nah. I'm not seeing it. Wonder how Darcy feels about Jackson's contract.
Darcy could legitimately expect a matching contract.
 
Not sure why people are talking 2 first rounders for an uncontracted player. Same situation with Jackson as with Clark last year. We set the price that we think is fair, then negotiate around that. If Melbourne don’t like it, they walk away and try to convince him to stay.

No doubt he’s an extremely talented player, but he doesn’t fill the immediate void we have and I don’t see why the price would be as high as two first rounders.

I just hope Belly doesn’t think 2 first round picks is the fair price.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Not sure why people are talking 2 first rounders for an uncontracted player. Same situation with Jackson as with Clark last year. We set the price that we think is fair, then negotiate around that. If Melbourne don’t like it, they walk away and try to convince him to stay.

No doubt he’s an extremely talented player, but he doesn’t fill the immediate void we have and I don’t see why the price would be as high as two first rounders.

I just hope Belly doesn’t think 2 first round picks is the fair price.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
The WC are waiting in the gutter.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Just have a bad feeling we could get shafted like we did with Jesse Hogan
 


Callum Twomey
@CalTwomey


West Coast expected to protect its strong draft hand, with pick No.2 considered unlikely to be a part of a play to land Luke Jackson. Melbourne expected to target two first-round picks, including an early one inside the top-10, if he heads to Freo.
 
Luke Jackson: "I've already got a flag. I will go to whatever club offers me the most money in WA, playing for retirement not success."

Don't want him.
It's the perfect out if he has just nominated the state. In my mind we are now under no obligation to trade for him, where we would of been if he had nominated us. Offer what we got for Langdon and let's move on.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. Luke Jackson - Yay or Nay?

Back
Top