No, Bill is a simpleton. But like a lot of men, he wants to determine the outcomes so he isn't affected. Life doesn't work that way.Boy o Boy, Wow wee, Richo! Is it possible the good bloke Big Bill Brownless could be a misogynist?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
No, Bill is a simpleton. But like a lot of men, he wants to determine the outcomes so he isn't affected. Life doesn't work that way.Boy o Boy, Wow wee, Richo! Is it possible the good bloke Big Bill Brownless could be a misogynist?
Talk about an overreaction i must have missed the part where he killed someone, So 2 single adults having sex and for that you think most people will not want to see Lyon on TV screens ever again.
I sat there last night while he was blubbering away and it was all about his hurt feeings and how the 'bro code' was broken. The more I thought about it, it seemed Brownless' focus was on his feeings and Lyon's behaviour. Not one mention of what she wanted. In these things I don't there there is ever going to be 100% acceptability of Lyon's behaviour from the aggrieved party, no matter how Lyon approached it. Brownless seems to be putting the 'male' aspect above anything else.
Why would you be calling her a ****?Perhaps he is trying to not **** shame his wife and the mother of his children.
Where did I say that?Why would you be calling her a ****?
'You' as in anyone calling her a ****. Why would anyone call her a ****?Where did I say that?
Lyon must have thought last night that he has hurt beyond comprehension the one bloke who worshipped him every day.
How does he come back?
Billy, to his eternal courage and dignity, gave him an opening. And that's what you call a mate.
'You' as in anyone calling her a ****. Why would anyone call her a ****?
Not one mention of what she wanted.[/QUOTE
Brownless seems to be putting the 'male' aspe
Please read what you wrote previously. You made the point that there was no mention of what the wife wanted and that billy seems to be putting the male aspect. Billy could easily have said that she was as bad as Garry and that would have been **** shaming, which is a verb and not a noun. I did not say she was a ****.
He did not bad mouth her and that is to his credit.
The behavior of these two was without consideration of the feelings of people who loved them and was pure hedonism. Use whatever label you choose but I did not call her a ****.
Perhaps he is trying to not **** shame his wife and the mother of his children.
I don't care how new-age sensitive you are. I bet you couldn't handle it any better.Jesus Christ.
We aren't cavemen who own our women. She wasn't Bill's property to be stolen.
Garry was single
She was single
They hooked up as two single consenting adults.
Billy's ego is bruised and his friendship with Garry is obviously over, but can we not talk about women as if they are akin to nothing more than trophies?
When she chooses one of his close mates....Which means what?
My comments were about Brownless being upset because his bro code has been violated. I haven't inferred or read any inference that she is a ****. I'm saying she should be allowed to determine her own choices and once separated, he gets to have minimal input into her choices.
Maybe his wife was OK with it as long as it wasn't her best friend?
You are determined to misconstrue what I wrote.Which means what?
My comments were about Brownless being upset because his bro code has been violated. I haven't inferred or read any inference that she is a ****. I'm saying she should be allowed to determine her own choices and once separated, he gets to have minimal input into her choices.
Did Bill give a continental about his wife and the mother of his children while he was being a good ol Aussie Bloke and rootin' around on her for the last 20 odd years?
She did not seem the care about her best friend did she.Maybe his wife was OK with it as long as it wasn't her best friend?
Correct! It's a story because two of them are well known public identities. Also, betrayal and lies are always grist for the tabloid mill and social media.The suggestion that he's letting his ex-wife off the hook because he isn't publicly shaming her is absurd. She's irrelevant to the public interest. They're only interested because of his relationship with Garry which is at the core of these matters. If it was instead his best mate "Greg Smith", the story wouldn't get any attraction outside of Women's Weekly.
come on, the only reason we are all here arguing with strangers is because they are public figures. By extension so are their wives. They get to have Louis Vuitton hand bags and mansions and when they misbehave We take salacious pleasure in the detailsThe suggestion that he's letting his ex-wife off the hook because he isn't publicly shaming her is absurd. She's irrelevant to the public interest. They're only interested because of his relationship with Garry which is at the core of these matters. If it was instead his best mate "Greg Smith", the story wouldn't get any traction outside of Women's Weekly.
What! The wives are bit players in the public context.Oh
come on, the only reason we are all here arguing with strangers is because they are public figures. By extension so are their wives. They get to have Louis Vuitton hand bags and mansions and when they misbehave We take salacious pleasure in the details
Or her walletMaybe his wife was OK with it as long as it wasn't her best friend?
it's all speculation.Did Bill give a continental about his wife and the mother of his children while he was being a good ol Aussie Bloke and rootin' around on her for the last 20 odd years?
It's not an ideal situation, but sometimes these things happen for a number of factors we aren't privy to.When she chooses one of his close mates....