Mark Seaby has Quit the Eagles

[Cerpin Taxt]

So posters shouldn't comment on other sides lists when discussing if they are interested in trading for one of our players.

If your sick of it go do something else!!!! It's a public forum, deal with it.

I didn't say posters shouldn't comment on other sides.

However, you seem to think the WBD are suitable when:
Their posters have shown zero interest
And they're already committing their first pick to their ruck division

It's not difficult to understand that a club may be reluctant to then use their second rounder on a ruckman in the last untampered draft. The club has indicated it'll look for a key forward, but has said nothing about ruckmen.

Just putting two and two together here. Developing a scenerio you think fits the club is worthless. Over and out.

 

[Big Bad Hawk]

Mark Seaby will not go to a club if he going to be the 2nd ruckman.

Sydney need a new ruckman
Carlton yes if they cant get the deal with fremantle
Melbourne yes big time
Richmond no not really

 

[sharpie]

I would have though Port might be in the mix as well.

 

[Brazen]

Mark Seaby will not go to a club if he going to be the 2nd ruckman.

Sydney need a new ruckman
Carlton yes if they cant get the deal with fremantle
Melbourne yes big time
Richmond no not really

Really?.. isnt simmonds 30yrs old? Would let them float him up forward more while their other backups develop...

 

[Big Bad Hawk]

Really?.. isnt simmonds 30yrs old? Would let them float him up forward more while their other backups develop...

They have just sign up ten players. one of them being Angus Graham you is up in coming Ruckman

 

[scottwade]

Mark Seaby will not go to a club if he going to be the 2nd ruckman.

Sydney need a new ruckman
Carlton yes if they cant get the deal with fremantle
Melbourne yes big time
Richmond no not really

They have just sign up ten players. one of them being Angus Graham you is up in coming Ruckman

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24437818-2722,00.html

"While Richmond will not give up its first national draft selection, No8 overall, its second-round selection (No26) could be used as part of a deal to satisfy the Eagles.
Tigers general manager of football operations Craig Cameron said: "We're in preliminary discussions with West Coast."
The Eagles, who will almost certainly replace Seaby by drafting West Australian ruckman Nick Naitanui with their first pick (No2 overall), will demand a better deal than Richmond's second-round draft selection"

 

[Obeanie1]

I didn't say posters shouldn't comment on other sides.

However, you seem to think the WBD are suitable when:
Their posters have shown zero interest
And they're already committing their first pick to their ruck division

It's not difficult to understand that a club may be reluctant to then use their second rounder on a ruckman in the last untampered draft. The club has indicated it'll look for a key forward, but has said nothing about ruckmen.

Just putting two and two together here. Developing a scenerio you think fits the club is worthless. Over and out.

My opinion is based on what alot of commentators have already said and also putting 1 + 2 together. Most people see the Dogs list problems are in the ruck and a key forward.

Many people also see them as close to a GF so to fix your ruck problems you need to trade for an established ruck, not a 18yr old bean pole.

How is that worthless thinking?

Put simply trading is for now, drafting is for the future. The Dogs are hot now so they need to balance their decision on what they need now versus what they need in 5 years.

 

[Big Bad Hawk]

There is no way Melbourne will let Nick Naitanui go he will be the Number 1 Pick.

 

[sharpie]

There is no way Melbourne will let Nick Naitanui go he will be the Number 1 Pick.

That's be awesome - would love Jack Watts

 

[Biggie]

There is no way Melbourne will let Nick Naitanui go he will be the Number 1 Pick.

Jack Watts will be going to Melbourne with the #1 pick.

 

[Biggie]

I would have though Port might be in the mix as well.

They are.

However Krakouer has apparently said he would like to stay at Port.

http://www.afl.com.au/News/NEWSARTICLE/tabid/208/Default.aspx?newsId=68569

 

[PAFC66]

We dont want Seaby... he would only play SANFL for a year anyway and that wouldn't be a 24 year olds first option.

Ive herd pick 4 for Kerr... but i dunno whether it's worth the risk.

 

[Kevin_Cat_Prime]

We dont want Seaby... he would only play SANFL for a year anyway and that wouldn't be a 24 year olds first option.

Ive herd pick 4 for Kerr... but i dunno whether it's worth the risk.

Well he has gotten his bearings together off field it seems.

For now.

 

[PAFC66]

Well he has gotten his bearings together off field it seems.

For now.

He has however we already have too many midfielders.

 

[huggy_b]

I think he would be a good fit at the Saints personally and could learn a lot from King and be a good shield for McEvoy until he is physically ready (given that its likely to be Kings last season).

The Eagles in the paper over here are saying they want a first round pick, but based on last season, he'd be worth a 2nd/3rd rounder and no more really. Did his trade currency real damage this year. But he is young (24) in ruckman terms, so that is a positive.

 

[banana_bus]

The Eagles in the paper over here are saying they want a first round pick

They have gone mad.

 

[Geelongfor2008]

Mark who???

 

[ToO]

Sounds as if it's all but done from what I hear.

 

[Collins-Langford-Ayres]

I wouldnt think you guys would take him.

Honestly I dont think he will play AFL next year. If Wallace picks him up he will be ridiculed.

[/quote.]

I am pretty sure Tezza won't worry about that.

 

[banana_bus]

I wouldnt think you guys would take him.

Honestly I dont think he will play AFL next year. If Wallace picks him up he will be ridiculed.

I am pretty sure Tezza won't worry about that.

Looks like I was wrong. Also looks like I wont be seeing a premiership in the next 20 years.