Now you sound like those people who post climate change denialist crap, challenge people to waste their time debating it, and declare it somehow means something when they don’t.Michael West constructs a strong, well-argued case, and your responses have consisted of nothing more than "nah."
I’ve highlighted that it is a very poor and biased article, as a caution that anyone who reads it would do well to cast their net a bit more widely and get themselves a more informed view. That’s all.
What you do with that information is entirely up to you.
Last edited: