Matthew Scarlett - Washed up hack

Remove this Banner Ad

You can judge him on the 28 disposals and 9 marks his opponent had if you like.
Gathered mainly on a wing and across half-back?

You obviously know a lot about footy if you would put your full-back on a midfielder.
 
Scarlett is the only one embarrassing himself.
Agreed.

kevinscarlett.jpg
 
Always loved the "<insert Geelong defender> doesn't play on the best forward" argument. You'd almost have believing they ran around by themselves all day.

Scarlett didn't play on Richo because he didn't play out of the goalsquare...god I don't even know why I bit at this rubbish.

Enjoy the year champ.
Geelong doesnt have a single accountable defender. Not one of our defenders ever plays on a forward.

In fact all our backmen only look good because of the quality backmen around them...

this always brings out a good lol...
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Try to win the argument? I have won the argument, with a score of 20.14.134 to 7.6.48. The results speak for themselves.

Ok..how about 13.14.92 - 13.9.87? As long as we're picking games in the past.
Not that either score has anything to do with the subject at hand.
Scarlett is an out and out champion who has been twice AA and a Premiership player in the past 2 years. He shows no signs of slowing down other than the ankle injury he is carrying without complaint atm.
End thread.
 
even for a troll on bay 13 this is a stretch.. c'mon no one ha got past him in the all australian full back position 4 times plus a premiership... Fletcher is a poor mans Scarlett... Best full back since SOS EASILY!
 
Isn't it great though when people here assume they know better than AFL coaches, players and media experts and decide that a player is overrated by the so called experts?

It's a wonder they haven't made you Essendon coach Guzz and PP, since you guys clearly know so much more than any of the others.
 
Isn't it great though when people here assume they know better than AFL coaches, players and media experts and decide that a player is overrated by the so called experts?

It's a wonder they haven't made you Essendon coach Guzz and PP, since you guys clearly know so much more than any of the others.
In fairness they couldn't have done any worse than the actual over the past five years.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mate, Alistair Clarkson lays awake at night pumping his knob to a stump fantasising about having a player of Scarlett's quality in his back-line.

Next thing you will be telling us that Scarlett is as good as Langford, Silvangi, Moore, Southby, Dench,.

FFS get a clue.
 
Next thing you will be telling us that Scarlett is as good as Langford, Silvangi, Moore, Southby, Dench,.

FFS get a clue.
Did you deliberately ensure you listed a Hawthorn player first or did you do that subconsciously?
 
Nice deflection chump. Scarlett has never been towelled up to the tune of 9 goals in a GF, with his opponent winning a Norm Smith.

As I said, Langford. ROFL

Get a clue you nuffie.

Ablett kicked 3 on Langford. (would you believe it the Hawks beat Geelong yet again)

Dunstall, Lockett and Ablett would have had a field day against Scarlett.
 
Isn't it great though when people here assume they know better than AFL coaches, players and media experts and decide that a player is overrated by the so called experts?

It's a wonder they haven't made you Essendon coach Guzz and PP, since you guys clearly know so much more than any of the others.

It is outrageous that myself and Guzz were overlooked for the job. In all seriousness most pundits in the media have no idea. I mean as if Port Adelaide are a quality side. I picked West Coast to beat them and we all know what happened. I am a footy oracle. ;) :D



* I actually did pick West Coast to win
 
does make a fair point

according to Tom Harley, Scarlett is the best defender his ever seen

if so why does he never play on the most damaging forward.... Ever
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Matthew Scarlett - Washed up hack

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top