People are smart enough to stay off the tram tracks.
As for the OP, Polak's injury was miles more severe than Robertson's, however this begs the question, should any player be able to be rookied as a result of a non-football related injury, ie Muston in a car crash?
Ramanaskus could not prevent his cancer.
Lonergan could not prevent losing a kidney.
Polak could, and should, have been able to avoid a tram, as you said it was unfortunate, but that's where it lies, it was preventable and it's a loss for Richmond, but they shouldn't be allowed to rookie him.
Muston was not an AFL listed player when he was hit by a car so it is not relevent.
Lonergan's was a football related injury.
Polak's was a terrible accident, i repeat, accident. All of us take educated risks every day of our lives, he was just one of the unlucky people.
why is it that polak is being portrayed as innocent? he was out with friends when he was hit. there was no investigation or anything. it is very possible he was under the influence. Most likely he was being an idiot. How you dont see a tram, even at night, there is lighting on them for a reason.
He is innocent you fool! Regardless of whether he was drinking or not. You are the same person who was sprouting rubbish the very morning he had his accident,
saying he must have been pissed and we better hear the full story etc. I guess you have ever jay walked or crossed tram lines without using the crossing? Would
you consider yourself 'guilty' if you were crossing a road and got put in a wheelchair because you failed to look in both directions?