- Dec 18, 2005
- 22,113
- 15,292
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Richmond
17.02.14
52,772
52,772
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
We are currently 3122 behind them (compared to 7480 5 weeks ago)....I say we are still on target to overtake them by around RD 1/2 on current daily differentials.
there won't be much movement in the numbers this week after that insipid "display" on Sat. night. Will be lucky to get 1000 this week.
Friday night mate
Anyone go to the family day? Wonder how many would have signed up?
there won't be much movement in the numbers this week after that insipid "display" on Sat. night. Will be lucky to get 1000 this week.
its good to compare as we want to go past them and eventully collingwood and be the best, obviously membership revenue is more important but numbers is all we have atmdo we need to be so obsessed with the Hawks numbers?
if we get our stretch target of 75k but they get 76k, does that mean our membership drive is a failure?
Focus on our own digits, what other clubs do is their own affair
Yes, absolutely we need to keep tabs on the Hawks. It helps keep the membership tally just a little bit more interesting, for a few of us anyway.do we need to be so obsessed with the Hawks numbers?
if we get our stretch target of 75k but they get 76k, does that mean our membership drive is a failure?
Focus on our own digits, what other clubs do is their own affair
Yes, absolutely we need to keep tabs on the Hawks. It helps keep the membership tally just a little bit more interesting, for a few of us anyway.
It is not a failure if Richmond get 75K regardless how many the Hawks get, but it will make it sweeter if we get more than them!
do we need to be so obsessed with the Hawks numbers?
Why?
wot he saidIts not entirely bout the hawks as such its about them being in 2nd spot and we in third on the membership tally, and they are the team i want to overtake nothing more, nothing less, if it was the bulldogs in 2nd or Swans id say exactly the same thing, we are X amount behind them etc etc, 2nd spot is there for the taking and once we take that we then look at No 1 in the coming years and thats the Pies....
Its not entirely bout the hawks as such its about them being in 2nd spot and we in third on the membership tally, and they are the team i want to overtake nothing more, nothing less, if it was the bulldogs in 2nd or Swans id say exactly the same thing, we are X amount behind them etc etc, 2nd spot is there for the taking and once we take that we then look at No 1 in the coming years and thats the Pies....
what does "second spot" mean though? People complain that the Hawks contain Tassie numbers, yet are obsessed with over taking them.
Also given the differences in memberships from club to club (in terms of pricing, games, etc), its impossible to make a straight comparison anymore anyway.
When you look at money made on memberships, we are a lot further down that ladder than third, showing we have a lot more work to do to consider ourselves a top membership club with bragging rights.
until then the membership tally is good for one thing - comparing progress against previous years sales.
53,077
Shit day
your over-analysing. Its the simple thrill of the chase. they have a number, we have a number, we want to catch their number. nothing profound or useful or purposeful than that. They don't go out riding with the hounds on a fox hunt because they need to cull foxes.
On a serious not, I used to have a pet membership for my dog, but its not personalised, so i didnt see the value plus what you got was not really usuable for my lab, so I cancelled it.My dogs a member!!! That doesn't count though and he's pissed about that
what does "second spot" mean though? People complain that the Hawks contain Tassie numbers, yet are obsessed with over taking them.
Also given the differences in memberships from club to club (in terms of pricing, games, etc), its impossible to make a straight comparison anymore anyway.
When you look at money made on memberships, we are a lot further down that ladder than third, showing we have a lot more work to do to consider ourselves a top membership club with bragging rights.
until then the membership tally is good for one thing - comparing progress against previous years sales.
That's why they put a rabbit around a grey hound track.Its not entirely bout the hawks as such its about them being in 2nd spot and we in third on the membership tally, and they are the team i want to overtake nothing more, nothing less, if it was the bulldogs in 2nd or Swans id say exactly the same thing, we are X amount behind them etc etc, 2nd spot is there for the taking and once we take that we then look at No 1 in the coming years and thats the Pies....