Werewolf Merlin Werewolf

[Chipmunk]

dogs105 please

eth-dog jmoo wan

 

[MWPP]

Vote mwerps

eth-dog jmoo wan

TRUST THIS VOTE

IF ANYTHING IS TO HAPPEN TO ME IT NOT ONLY WILL IT SHOW MWERPS IS EVIL BUT LOOK AT THOSE WHO HAVE VOTED WITH MWERPS SO FAR

You seem to be blackmailed today

Damn that's a brutal night

There was something a bit off with mwerps posting yesterday. I might be reading it completely wrong but happy to sit my vote there until more info comes to light.

eth-dog jmoo wan

I am prepared to go with mwerps as the lynch today. I know their game really well and only ever votes for me when evil. This is a solid read on a long established pattern. eth-dog jmoo wan

Which makes these two votes seem especially suspicious

3KZ like yesterday for being third on the wagon, albeit isn’t lurking unlike yesterday
eth-dog jmoo wan

 

[dank420_]

Yuck

 

[MWPP]

dogs105 please

eth-dog jmoo wan

Unusual to stick to #4 on day 2…
Reasoning?

 

[Chipmunk]

Unusual to stick to #4 on day 2…
Reasoning?

It’s actually not unusual, but sure:

• he didn’t revenge vote my #4 vote
• he was a leading votegetter before the whole Pickitt movement.
• he seems active for actives’ sake. When I read back MC seemed to agree that something was up, so happy to have my vote here for now.

 

[dogs105]

DINGSTER has been far too quiet for my liking. Thanks eth-dog and jmoo wan

 

[dogs105]

It’s actually not unusual, but sure:

• he didn’t revenge vote my #4 vote
• he was a leading votegetter before the whole Pickitt movement.
• he seems active for actives’ sake. When I read back MC seemed to agree that something was up, so happy to have my vote here for now.

Would you prefer people to not be active?

 

[dank420_]

Why didn't anyone listen to me yesterday?

mwerps eth-dog jmoo wan

 

[Chipmunk]

Would you prefer people to not be active?

mwerps and I have had many conversations about this point which I don’t really want to rehash at the time.

I say vote on how you interpret the thread and don’t blindly target lurkers.

 

[dogs105]

Why didn't anyone listen to me yesterday?

mwerps eth-dog jmoo wan

Because sometimes you're evil

 

[dogs105]

mwerps and I have had many conversations about this point which I don’t really want to rehash at the time.

I say vote on how you interpret the thread and don’t blindly target lurkers.

Okay. So if lurking, won't be targeted. Thanks.

 

[MWPP]

It’s actually not unusual, but sure:

• he didn’t revenge vote my #4 vote
• he was a leading votegetter before the whole Pickitt movement.
• he seems active for actives’ sake. When I read back MC seemed to agree that something was up, so happy to have my vote here for now.

Fair enough. He has been around long enough to know your schtick which explains the non-revenge vote , I think the votes were scattered so not reading into point two, but I agree on point 3.

 

[dank420_]

Because sometimes you're evil

This curse of mine.

 

[dogs105]

Fair enough. He has been around long enough to know your schtick which explains the non-revenge vote , I think the votes were scattered so not reading into point two, but I agree on point 3.

Though to be fair, I've been active in the match thread and on the Adelaide Board as well, which is a rarity. Anyway, will not melt.

 

[MWPP]

mwerps and I have had many conversations about this point which I don’t really want to rehash at the time.

I say vote on how you interpret the thread and don’t blindly target lurkers.

We have discussed it in detail
But one thing we haven’t discussed is how to treat people who mention the current werewolf thread in another thread but don’t post here...
(not you of course)

 

[dogs105]

We have discussed it in detail
But one thing we haven’t discussed is how to treat people who mention the current werewolf thread in another thread but don’t post here...
(not you of course)

Ooh name names!!!

 

[MWPP]

Though to be fair, I've been active in the match thread and on the Adelaide Board as well, which is a rarity. Anyway, will not melt.

You have indeed. I still have your adorable dragon costume in mind

 

[Chipmunk]

We have discussed it in detail
But one thing we haven’t discussed is how to treat people who mention the current werewolf thread in another thread but don’t post here...
(not you of course)

Oh I read that, it seemed innocent so I say let it slide.

 

[dogs105]

Oh I read that, it seemed innocent so I say let it slide.

Ooh, name names!!

 

[MWPP]

Ooh name names!!!

Oh I read that, it seemed innocent so I say let it slide.

It seemed to be the very definition of lurking and I would expect someone like 3KZ to pick up on it if they were good. My vote remains there, but dogs I was referring to the other person I voted for yesterday, Barrybran.

 

[Chipmunk]

It seemed to be the very definition of lurking and I would expect someone like 3KZ to pick up on it if they were good. My vote remains there, but dogs I was referring to the other person I voted for yesterday, Barrybran.

Oh, I wasn’t referring to him! I was talking about Wise Guy Sam saying in the bye thread that he was going to vote for you as revenge for not tagging him in your OP

 

[rye]

Damn that's a brutal night

There was something a bit off with mwerps posting yesterday. I might be reading it completely wrong but happy to sit my vote there until more info comes to light.

eth-dog jmoo wan

I am prepared to go with mwerps as the lynch today. I know their game really well and only ever votes for me when evil. This is a solid read on a long established pattern. eth-dog jmoo wan

these votes stink!

 

[MWPP]

Oh, I wasn’t referring to him! I was talking about Wise Guy Sam saying in the bye thread that he was going to vote for you as revenge for not tagging him in your OP

Oh yes, that discussion was in this thread and also, innocent (re: Wise Guy Sam )

 

[Chipmunk]

Oh yes, that discussion was in this thread and also, innocent (re: Wise Guy Sam )

Are you telling me you visited a Gumbies thread?

 

[MWPP]

these votes stink!

What about Dank’s vote?