Werewolf Merlin Werewolf

[BEaston]

Yes but my theory is that at least one of the people who voted for me was in the same faction that intimidated me. With 3KZ there are a few more specific things that stick out that I mentioned above . And there’s nothing either of you can say that will change that opinion. That now goes for IMS too.

Fair enough. I think if you had have said that at the start that would have made more sense.

Your roundabout logic this morning made no sense. However that was more about clearing yourself rather than making a counter-accusation.

Why do you think several people reading you as suspect? (please don't try use ryes intimidation as a reason again as it's irrelevant to your own role)
As I said, I'm happy to have my mind changed.

 

[dank420_]

I did respond to this earlier with a huh but I’ll elaborate, since you seem to have disappeared
-what do you mean?

I actually think that is the intimidation post.

 

[dank420_]

sorry blackmail*

 

[MWPP]

Fair enough. I think if you had have said that at the start that would have made more sense.

Your roundabout logic this morning made no sense. However that was more about clearing yourself rather than making a counter-accusation.

Why do you think several people reading you as suspect? (please don't try use ryes intimidation as a reason again as it's irrelevant to your own role)
As I said, I'm happy to have my mind changed.

I didn’t want to state what I thought was obvious but then it became apparent that it wasn’t that obvious to some others

Oh and it is very relevant because almost everyone else is unknown. If you agree that the combination of yesterday’s and today’s intimidations mean I‘m not mafia then based on probability alone then I am quite simply note the vote today when almost everyone else could be any evil role.

A few people have come up with reasons as varied as too nice, or voting for them, both of which are weak. But not as weak as the incorrect allegation that the sante vote was a slip up when I mentioned intimidation in the very post .

 

[MWPP]

I actually think that is the intimidation post.

sorry blackmail*

You think IMS was blackmailed twice in a row? Interesting .

It doesn’t fit in with rye’s post and questioning of people who voted for me either side of them either .

 

[dank420_]

You think IMS was blackmailed twice in a row? Interesting .

It doesn’t fit in with rye’s post and questioning of people who voted for me either side of them either .

No, it's been IMS then Fijian. You quoted Fijian just now.

Rye's vote looks blackmaily but he used that vote format that only gets used outside the board.

 

[3KZ is Football]

You only use it selectively though hence why it’s being used on you.

I don’t remember the last time I was evil much less clearing you out when evil so I’m going to assume you’re citing games from
years ago

#AmnesiaTheory

 

[3KZ is Football]

I guess the seasoned veteran might find lists annoying, but it’s a useful tool.
Last game I played I had so many windows open - nuts!

Why were you looking at nuts on the internet? I’m not judging you, but you are not very discrete.

 

[MWPP]

No, it's been IMS then Fijian. You quoted Fijian just now.

Rye's vote looks blackmaily but he used that vote format that only gets used outside the board.

IMS also voted for me and said “reasons”

Fair enough on rye. Let’s see if the vote gets changed

 

[damicky]

I like lists because I can’t be bothered doing the research myself

 

[MWPP]

Why were you looking at nuts on the internet? I’m not judging you, but you are not very discrete.

Sounds more like something Chipmunk would do anyway.

 

[dank420_]

IMS also voted for me and said “reasons”

Fair enough on rye. Let’s see if the vote gets changed

There will be some evil, specifically mafia with votes on you.

 

[BEaston]

I didn’t want to state what I thought was obvious but then it became apparent that it wasn’t that obvious to some others

Oh and it is very relevant because almost everyone else is unknown. If you agree that the combination of yesterday’s and today’s intimidations mean I‘m not mafia then based on probability alone then I am quite simply note the vote today when almost everyone else could be any evil role.

A few people have come up with reasons as varied as too nice, or voting for them, both of which are weak. But not as weak as the incorrect allegation that the sante vote was a slip up when I mentioned intimidation in the very post .

I agree with you those first two reasons are weak.

My reasons are also somewhat weak but to me your posts align with evil behaviour in the past. That is what seems to be deliberate misinformation posting in the thread. As well as twisting yourself up in logic gymnastics. Both of which have been on display.

An example right above in misquoting CF for IMS. Or earlier attributing sante's kill to mafia when you were trying to clear yourself. Even the sante thing from yesterday that dank picked up on. IMO these are things you don't do when village. As I said though it's a weak read but all I have to go off at this stage seeing as no real info has been forthcoming.

It's interesting that yourself and 3kz are going head to head. 50/50 on one of you being evil it looks like.

 

[CursingFijian]

I did respond to this earlier with a huh but I’ll elaborate, since you seem to have disappeared
-what do you mean?

It was weird to see two good players take the bait so easily. (Mwerps and rye)

this is true, oversight by me.

Dogs105
Was suss on him last night, the mafia leader looks like he doesnt know what hes doing and dogs is quite active.

I don't read much into sante and mcbg voting for mwerps (unless mcbg missed a kill, can't remember).

I actually didnt check.
I was going off the intimidation where they said 'lOoK who VoTed for mwerps', i mean why else would they say that.

My bad.

I was referencing these exchanges between you and CrimsonViolet. Where he seemingly tries to distance from you then apologises as if to take some heat off you. It's the sort of exchange I might expect from faction mates.

But my vote for you is tied to that very quick bandwagon vote of yours on Day 1. It was very unconsidered for a player who I think reads the game well most times.

 

[MWPP]

I agree with you those first two reasons are weak.

My reasons are also somewhat weak but to me your posts align with evil behaviour in the past. That is what seems to be deliberate misinformation posting in the thread. As well as twisting yourself up in logic gymnastics. Both of which have been on display.

An example right above in misquoting CF for IMS. Or earlier attributing sante's kill to mafia when you were trying to clear yourself. Even the sante thing from yesterday that dank picked up on. IMO these are things you don't do when village. As I said though it's a weak read but all I have to go off at this stage seeing as no real info has been forthcoming.

It's interesting that yourself and 3kz are going head to head. 50/50 on one of you being evil it looks like.

No, I’m far more careful as evil and I put in some errors for people to either pick up on or not as good , because that’s all I have when I am a villager (the thread)

I quoted them both fwiw

 

[MWPP]

I was referencing these exchanges between you and CrimsonViolet. Where he seemingly tries to distance from you then apologises as if to take some heat off you. It's the sort of exchange I might expect from faction mates.

But my vote for you is tied to that very quick bandwagon vote of yours on Day 1. It was very unconsidered for a player who I think reads the game well most times.

Unconsidered, when I was the first to even suggest intimidation? Again, at least CV acknowledged that. You, Dapp and others seem to keep overlooking that because it was convenient .

 

[3KZ is Football]

I agree with you those first two reasons are weak.

My reasons are also somewhat weak but to me your posts align with evil behaviour in the past. That is what seems to be deliberate misinformation posting in the thread. As well as twisting yourself up in logic gymnastics. Both of which have been on display.

An example right above in misquoting CF for IMS. Or earlier attributing sante's kill to mafia when you were trying to clear yourself. Even the sante thing from yesterday that dank picked up on. IMO these are things you don't do when village. As I said though it's a weak read but all I have to go off at this stage seeing as no real info has been forthcoming.

It's interesting that yourself and 3kz are going head to head. 50/50 on one of you being evil it looks like.

Bags not me!

 

[MWPP]

BEaston due to that opening dodgy post
jmoo wan eth-dog

 

[MWPP]

There will be some evil, specifically mafia with votes on you.

Ye

Do you still think that CF is intimidated in light of that recent multi quote post?

 

[CursingFijian]

Unconsidered, when I was the first to even suggest intimidation? Again, at least CV acknowledged that. You, Dapp and others seem to keep overlooking that because it was convenient .

Yes, I accept that you acknowledged the intimidation, but the quick vote from you and Rye was off. Sante posted immediately after you, dismissed it as a blackmail and witheld his vote...which is the considered approach I would have expected from village mwerps.

Sorry, but you're the best bet at the moment, in my honest opinion.

 

[BEaston]

BEaston due to that opening dodgy post
jmoo wan eth-dog

Interesting. We'll now see if any of your team mates come to support your vote.

 

[dank420_]

Ye

Do you still think that CF is intimidated in light of that recent multi quote post?

moreso than rye.

I don't think mafia would be smart enough to imitate a posting style that well... Unless rye just added that to the post?

Either way, let's say one of them is, the votes are both on you.

I feel like they may have taken a punt on who might get some votes today.

I have to admit I am not as certain about you anymore.

 

[Pie 4 Life]

I reckon I'll still stick with damicky from yesterday, the fly-by vote caught my eye and hasn't added too much since.

jmoo wan and the absent eth-dog

 

[MWPP]

Interesting. We'll now see if any of your team mates come to support your vote.

I have no teammates /Pm

I feel like they may have taken a punt on who might get some votes today.

I have to admit I am not as certain about you anymore.

And yes , as before, I’m clearly not mafia so am not the play today. I’m done defending myself though. We are stuffed.

 

[MWPP]

Yes, I accept that you acknowledged the intimidation, but the quick vote from you and Rye was off. Sante posted immediately after you, dismissed it as a blackmail and witheld his vote...which is the considered approach I would have expected from village mwerps.

Sorry, but you're the best bet at the moment, in my honest opinion.

But I read it as such . Of course sante dismissed it as a blackmail as the target of it. But I maintain that IMS went too early. Now we know why. He was evil too