Harsh, but not too far from the mark
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Harsh, but not too far from the mark
Harsh, but not too far from the mark
His best attribute is his intercept marking and reading of the play. Matthew Scarlett, Darren Glass, and Alex Rance rarely played on the oppositions best forward. The thing is they all had Eric McKenzie, Harry Taylor, and Dylan Grimes as support. Weitering has no support, Kemp is not good enough. We need a second KPDIf that's true, that rope has well and truly been used up.
Sorry Jacob but if we don't start winning, you'll have a much longer off season to recover than you'd like. It's time you went to the most dangerous forward each week.
I read it. Was a steaming pile of based on nonsense.Did you read it?
It literally talks to the points you raised.
This may be true but Carlton are number 1 in the competition in 2024 for goals per inside 50 and scoring shots per inside 50. So whilst we are not as clean or "nice-looking" as other teams we are being very efficient i50The part about our inside 50s and lack of uncontested marks was interesting and very apparent when you watch the game. Kick to Curnow and McKay's head.
We took over Sydney on the weekend so number 1 now for turnover differentialI read it. Was a steaming pile of based on nonsense.
A team that's apparently systemless and poorly coached has the 2nd best scores from turnover differential in the comp... Probably the #1 indicator there is...
Just more media pile on pretending to be based in fact.
Wow... So we really must be poorly coached then!We took over Sydney on the weekend so number 1 now for turnover differential
This may be true but Carlton are number 1 in the competition in 2024 for goals per inside 50 and scoring shots per inside 50. So whilst we are not as clean or "nice-looking" as other teams we are being very efficient i50
No we don't. You don't have that return over a whole season if you're relying on miracles. We have a system that plays to its strengths. While we do overuse them sometimes, Curnow and McKay consistently create goals for the team. Far more than anyone else in our forward line.We have two of the best key forwards in the modern game. We rely on them to complete miracles to score goals with our inside 50s at times.
The part about our inside 50s and lack of uncontested marks was interesting and very apparent when you watch the game. Kick to Curnow and McKay's head.
"Miracles" don't get you ranked number 1 in the competition at something in my opinion.We have two of the best key forwards in the modern game. We rely on them to complete miracles to score goals with our inside 50s at times.
"Miracles" don't get you ranked number 1 in the competition at something in my opinion.
While that all may be true, there was zero point leaving him on Dixon (who's got the mobility of a statue these days) while we were getting beaten elsewhere.His best attribute is his intercept marking and reading of the play. Matthew Scarlett, Darren Glass, and Alex Rance rarely played on the oppositions best forward. The thing is they all had Eric McKenzie, Harry Taylor, and Dylan Grimes as support. Weitering has no support, Kemp is not good enough. We need a second KPD
Exactly this - I have given up on us ever looking like a peak Sydney this year where they just cut you apart with disposal. It is a far more attractive brand of football but our list has not been constructed to do that consistently.No we don't. You don't have that return over a whole season if you're relying on miracles. We have a system that plays to its strengths. While we do overuse them sometimes, Curnow and McKay consistently create goals for the team. Far more than anyone else in our forward line.
While uncontested marks would be nice to watch, we don't have the cattle for it due to the poor kicks in our front half. Fogarty, Motlop, Cottrell, Owies etc struggle to hit targets in wide open space let alone a congested forward line. Kicking to H and Charles is an extremely efficient method even if it looks scrappy at times.
Without Harry on the weekend we should have adjusted our entries more I agree but when he has been there I don't think this has been a major issue.Ok well let's continue to bomb it to Charlie 2 or 3 v 1 and see how talent stacks up against system I guess.
Weiters towelled up Dixon (2 score involvements), while Esava managed 2.1 (a total of 3 score involvements) on Kemp, who is very undersized to play on either of those guys.Just because his best attribute is intercept marking, doesn't mean that's all he should be doing. It was clear on Friday night that Kemp wasn't up to it with Esava, our best defender should've gone to him on the night.
Towelling up Dixon can be done by anyone. If the kick doesn't land on his head, he's out of the contest. The guy is absolutely cooked.Weiters towelled up Dixon (2 socre involvements), while Esava managed 2.1 (a total of 3 score involvements) on Kemp, who is very undersized to play on either of those guys.
Esava V Kemp is a fair way down the list of reasons for our loss (-10 clearances, - 11 inside 50s).
Towelling up Dixon can be done by anyone. If the kick doesn't land on his head, he's out of the contest. The guy is absolutely cooked.
Not suggesting it was the reason we lost but these are the types of moves I think Vossy/the coaching staff need to be more pragmatic about mid game.
Eh it can be both. I think our stoppages are horrendously coached and purely rely on the brilliance of one of the stars to get the ball first or bust. I think in other areas we look really disciplined and well set up. It's a mix but in some departments I agree, we seem to be poor on the details/adjustments and creativity sometimes.Wow... So we really must be poorly coached then!
Same as it did last finals series is my guess. How many goals did those 2 kick in those games...Ok well let's continue to bomb it to Charlie 2 or 3 v 1 and see how talent stacks up against system I guess.
This argument comes down to one question... Do you really believe we'd play the same style of footy delivering the ball inside 50 and playing straight lanes down the wing if we added Gulden, Miers, Brent Daniels and Stengle to the side? The answer is obviously no.Ok well let's continue to bomb it to Charlie 2 or 3 v 1 and see how talent stacks up against system I guess.
We are number 1 in first touches at stoppage, but 10th in turning first touches into clearances. Is that coaching, or just poor form? We are getting our hands on the ball, but struggle to turn that into a positive impact on the gameEh it can be both. I think our stoppages are horrendously coached and purely rely on the brilliance of one of the stars to get the ball first or bust. I think in other areas we look really disciplined and well set up. It's a mix but in some departments I agree, we seem to be poor on the details/adjustments and creativity sometimes.
We took over Sydney on the weekend so number 1 now for turnover differential
Because we don't have set patterns/ 'cohesion' is my answer. In that, We may get the ball but we are under pressure, there are no blocks, taps to free players, hitting a tap at Pace. I've seen Walsh get hands first to the ball 50 times the last few weeks and have 2 players hanging off him making disposal impossible OR he gets his handball away to someone stationary who immediately gets crunched. Cripps and TDK have the power to break the first and even second tackle attempt which gives the other mids time to spread and then we exit stoppage nicely. But it basically only happens in that circumstance from what I can see. Obviously the other option is the hack it forward .....We are number 1 in first touches at stoppage, but 10th in turning first touches into clearances. Is that coaching, or just poor form? We are getting our hands on the ball, but struggle to turn that into a positive impact on the game