Opinion Mick Malthouse

What is the next move on Mick?

  • Sack him immediately; replacement coach to see out the year.

    Votes: 192 48.9%
  • Let him coach out the year then show him the door.

    Votes: 70 17.8%
  • Sign him now to give coaches and players some direction.

    Votes: 81 20.6%
  • Not sure yet... still too angry to think clearly.

    Votes: 50 12.7%

  • Total voters
    393
  • Poll closed .

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hendo CHB is potential AA.
Disciplined yet creative and provides a valuable option to go forward if we are chasing a game.
from my memory, when waite played down back he too was fantastic! its like we lose bigger picture and get greedy or have no depth, hendo would of been AA down back, but a static forward is so vulnarable these days that game has past. im just frustrated today
ps Go Blues
 
OMG are you serious? We were decimated with injury. 2012 was a write off. If I had have told you prior to that year what would happen to us injury wise you would have written us off. A great way to judge us is our first three rounds when we were injury free.

Any players you have up there that aren't performing under Malthouse have nothing to do with Ratts. Malthouse could have kept Eddie but he opted for his best mate Thomas. Mclean was never a vital cog for Ratten other than late 2012. He certainly didn't feature in 2011. Carrazzo has been in and out with injury for years. Waite is underperforming as is Tuohy, as is Garlett but they are not injured. Jamison and Simpson are not well below what they were. Kreuzer hasn't played regular good football for years now.

Point being any injured players that Malthouse has dealt with Ratten was not getting much out of them either in terms of consistently getting on the park. Kreuzer was always injured, Jamo kept getting hurt, Waite was in and out, Carrazzo was playing around 15 games a season. And the players that are underperforming? WTF has that got to do with Ratten that is Malthouse's failing, nothing more. If he can't get the best out of these blokes he shouldn't be in the job because the previous bloke in charge had them flying when out on the park.

Re Judd the maturing of the rest of the list balances that up to some extent. Like I said, we shouldn't be challenging but to say we are this bad (fifth last on the ladder) and not hold the coach accountable for it one bit, that my friend is blindness, blind faith to be exact. I'm not willing to show the same blind faith you are. If we had have picked up a rookie coach who had produced the same as Malthouse he'd be on his way out.

Injuries didn't cause a drop off in 2012
Our injuries were no worse than Collingwood's were that season (they finished 4th) or Hawthorn's have been this season (they are 3rd) or Geelong's last season (finished 2nd). We've had just as similar run with injuries the last couple of seasons as we had in 2012. There were nothing unusual about our injuries in 2012. Injuries are a part of football.

The only reason a few injuries effected us so badly was because we were too reliant on too few and when some of those few went down without anyone to take up the slack we wen't to shit with no one to fill the holes left.

Teams with good lists can lose good players and they bring in a good kid to fill in for a few weeks or another member of the 22 steps up. We didn't have that in 2012 because our list was too damn thin! We didn't have good kids running around in the reserves. We had 1 decent key forward and 1 or two decent key backs and no one to step up if they went down.

In 2012 we couldn't afford to lose Waite, Henderson, Carrazzo or Jamison like the cats could Hawkins or the Hawks could lose Franklin and Roughead. We couldn't afford to lose Carrazzo, Judd or Murphy because the players after them were no good. Hawks can still win without Hodge, Mitchell and Rioli just fine. Cats lose Ablett and win the flag next year. Our list overachieved and had a good run in 2011 when the bottom 4 of the top 8 was really poor quality and we had a good run with injury and people god over excited about it.

I just hate the injury excuse for 2012, we would have done ok had we had 0 injuries but it's unrealistic. Good teams can cope with a few injuries. Our list wasn't good enough to.

First three games hype
We beat Richmond (finished 12th), Brisbane (finished 13th) and Collingwood (finished 4th and started 2012 poorly) in the first three rounds and people thought we were going to be up there :rolleyes:.

Other
- Eddie wanted to leave and he left to be near his family and earn big dollars. Sam Jacobs was the best of 4 ruckmen we had once, Ratten let him go, probably could have kept him if we gave him the number one ruck role and a few extra dollars. Ratten Let Grigg go for Collins, Grigg would easily be getting a game with us. If players don't want to stay let them go! The club is bigger than any one player!

- Jamison, Simpson, Mclean, Armfield, Waite, Carrazzo, Kreuzer, Henderson, Garlett, Thomas and Tuohy were at their peak a few years ago, many of them are too old and can't run like they used to or are carring injury, if you want to blame a few injuries for not performing you can do it with this years group too. As for Garlett, you can ask him why he dropps his head going for marks and refuses to chase. Not Micks fault we have guys with poor attitudes who can't hack a challenge.

- How do you know Waite, Tuohy and Garlett aren't injured? Waite is injured at the moment and Tuohy has lost a lot of his pace which is obvious and a fitness thing. You can ask Waite and Garlett why they wont chase or do the team things. I haven't got time for poor attitudes and neither does the coach. Their the ones who can't get a kick, nothing to do with the coach.
- Judd played most of last year and hardly played this year. A lot of our past success comes from Judd and we are half the team without him up and firing.

- Ratten and Hughes ran the list into the ground to where it is now. Who do you recon missed opportunities to trade Bower, Thornton, Russell etc but kept them until he finally figured out they weren't much good? Ratten's job was to cut the list and decide who to trade, he hardly traded anyone in the end and kept anyone who could half play, we didn't have hardly any decent trades where we won under Ratten. Ratten threw away pick 11 to get Mclean. We could have had Talia and Fyfe instead of Lucas and Mclean! Ratten kept signing Joseph up who wasn't good enough. Let Grigg/Jacobs go for nothing, that's the same or worse than the Laidler thing people keep banging on about. Hughes who was an ordinary recruiter who had a patch between 2009-2012 we he hardly drafted anyone, it's killing out list now. The amount of 1st round picks he wasted as well! Malthouse has brought in guys like Docherty and Everitt for stuff all and traded out players who couldn't play.

- Our team is losing because our players aren't very good. Our players aren't very good because Hughes was a very poor recruiter and Ratten was a very ordinary judge of talent and projecting how good a young player would become and hung on to average players for too long and wasn't able to figure out who to trade.
 
White is not that versatile, he kicked four against the basket case of the comp, he won't be repeating that I guarantee. Don't even know how Watson enters the equation TBH.

Garlett and Waite are playing like two blokes that have lost their drive and their will to succeed. This has happened since the arrival of Malthouse.
So in your version of history Jeffy wasn't our leading goal kicker in Mick's first year as coach?
It's hard to keep up.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You do know how restricted free agency works don't you? He had the chance to keep him but opted to throw more coin at his has been son Daisy Thomas who BTW seems to be playing forward as well. I know who I'd rather have.
FYI Eddie decided at the start of 2013 he was gone. He and his manager refused to meet with the club for contract discussions & ignored MICK's phone calls.

You do know that you can't force a player to stay right?
 
Mick is a grumpy old fart but when you break it down the current poor state of the club on field is not really his fault...

- the midfield that carried us for years is nearing the end ... Scotland is gone, Judd and Carrazzo are very close to calling it a day, Mclean has been poor and looks to be near the end too.
- we haven't drafted well for years now, especially we haven't added any good midfielders in recent years (it is pretty much Murphy and Gibbs or bust)
- we had a record number of injuries/surgeries in the post season
- Betts left the club and his replacement Thomas is coming off a serious long term injury so was never going to blitz in 2014
- very, very few players on the list are good kicks
- the leaders are probably the worst in the AFL, full of introverts and one isn't even good enough to get a game right now

That is a recipe for disaster right there and none of it is Mick's fault. You could argue the Betts/Thomas thing is his fault, but by all accounts Betts wanted more than he is worth, and as I said Thomas needs to be evaluated in 2015. At least Dale brings a hard working attitude to the playing group.

Mick, like most coaches is only as good as the players he has available, and let's face it he has a list chock full of poor kicks, many of whom have been injured, and SFA replacements coming through from recent drafts.

I feel sorry for Mick. He must shake his head 100 times a game watching our players turn the ball over time and time again, with little to no leadership out there. But then that doesn't justify his contempt of media etc. He needs to pull his head in there.

He knows how to build lists so he's as qualified as anyone to oversee the renovation of the list in the coming years.
 
I admire your positiveness Ellas Ellas.
I'm just extremely disappointed (if true ) that hendo isn't injured.
If this is case he must go back and be a swingwan when required as his best football is down back
Hendo is injured.
 
Injuries didn't cause a drop off in 2012
Our injuries were no worse than Collingwood's were that season (they finished 4th) or Hawthorn's have been this season (they are 3rd) or Geelong's last season (finished 2nd). We've had just as similar run with injuries the last couple of seasons as we had in 2012. There were nothing unusual about our injuries in 2012. Injuries are a part of football.

The only reason a few injuries effected us so badly was because we were too reliant on too few and when some of those few went down without anyone to take up the slack we wen't to shit with no one to fill the holes left.

Teams with good lists can lose good players and they bring in a good kid to fill in for a few weeks or another member of the 22 steps up. We didn't have that in 2012 because our list was too damn thin! We didn't have good kids running around in the reserves. We had 1 decent key forward and 1 or two decent key backs and no one to step up if they went down.

In 2012 we couldn't afford to lose Waite, Henderson, Carrazzo or Jamison like the cats could Hawkins or the Hawks could lose Franklin and Roughead. We couldn't afford to lose Carrazzo, Judd or Murphy because the players after them were no good. Hawks can still win without Hodge, Mitchell and Rioli just fine. Cats lose Ablett and win the flag next year. Our list overachieved and had a good run in 2011 when the bottom 4 of the top 8 was really poor quality and we had a good run with injury and people god over excited about it.

I just hate the injury excuse for 2012, we would have done ok had we had 0 injuries but it's unrealistic. Good teams can cope with a few injuries. Our list wasn't good enough to.

First three games hype
We beat Richmond (finished 12th), Brisbane (finished 13th) and Collingwood (finished 4th and started 2012 poorly) in the first three rounds and people thought we were going to be up there :rolleyes:.

Other
- Eddie wanted to leave and he left to be near his family and earn big dollars. Sam Jacobs was the best of 4 ruckmen we had once, Ratten let him go, probably could have kept him if we gave him the number one ruck role and a few extra dollars. Ratten Let Grigg go for Collins, Grigg would easily be getting a game with us. If players don't want to stay let them go! The club is bigger than any one player!

- Jamison, Simpson, Mclean, Armfield, Waite, Carrazzo, Kreuzer, Henderson, Garlett, Thomas and Tuohy were at their peak a few years ago, many of them are too old and can't run like they used to or are carring injury, if you want to blame a few injuries for not performing you can do it with this years group too. As for Garlett, you can ask him why he dropps his head going for marks and refuses to chase. Not Micks fault we have guys with poor attitudes who can't hack a challenge.

- How do you know Waite, Tuohy and Garlett aren't injured? Waite is injured at the moment and Tuohy has lost a lot of his pace which is obvious and a fitness thing. You can ask Waite and Garlett why they wont chase or do the team things. I haven't got time for poor attitudes and neither does the coach. Their the ones who can't get a kick, nothing to do with the coach.
- Judd played most of last year and hardly played this year. A lot of our past success comes from Judd and we are half the team without him up and firing.

- Ratten and Hughes ran the list into the ground to where it is now. Who do you recon missed opportunities to trade Bower, Thornton, Russell etc but kept them until he finally figured out they weren't much good? Ratten's job was to cut the list and decide who to trade, he hardly traded anyone in the end and kept anyone who could half play, we didn't have hardly any decent trades where we won under Ratten. Ratten threw away pick 11 to get Mclean. We could have had Talia and Fyfe instead of Lucas and Mclean! Ratten kept signing Joseph up who wasn't good enough. Let Grigg/Jacobs go for nothing, that's the same or worse than the Laidler thing people keep banging on about. Hughes who was an ordinary recruiter who had a patch between 2009-2012 we he hardly drafted anyone, it's killing out list now. The amount of 1st round picks he wasted as well! Malthouse has brought in guys like Docherty and Everitt for stuff all and traded out players who couldn't play.

- Our team is losing because our players aren't very good. Our players aren't very good because Hughes was a very poor recruiter and Ratten was a very ordinary judge of talent and projecting how good a young player would become and hung on to average players for too long and wasn't able to figure out who to trade.
thats history now

i just want to see us moving forward and not hand out ridiculous contrats that top 6 clubs would never do, then i'll start feeling more at ease and confident.
 
Walker/Betts/Garlett and Yarran where a highly productive mosquito fleet. Judd/Murphy/Carrazzo and Kreuzer were highly efficient at extracting the ball and Gibbs/Scotland were very good at pinpointing kicks to Simpson on re the rebound. That was Carlton at its best - good enough to win shoot outs and that was back in 2011 - and Clubs soon found out the best way to stop Carlton's game plan- just crowd the stoppages.

It is three years later now - injury and age have taken their toll - and lack of decent back-ups ( due to Suns/GWS list monopoly as well as lower Clubs taking remainders ) sees Carlton where it is at.

Malthouse is guilty of not being able to conjure miracles.
Quoting this post because liking it isn't enough.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

[First three games hype
We beat Richmond (finished 12th), Brisbane (finished 13th) and Collingwood (finished 4th and started 2012 poorly) in the first three rounds and people thought we were going to be up there :rolleyes:.

.

I have to admit I fell for this too. The Essendon game was deflating but we won in Perth against the Dockers, yes they should have put us away, but it felt like the sort of win good sides have when not playing well. When we lost to St Kilda I put it down to a poor game.

It wasn't till the Port debacle that I thought the wheels had fallen off.
 
Injuries didn't cause a drop off in 2012
Our injuries were no worse than Collingwood's were that season (they finished 4th) or Hawthorn's have been this season (they are 3rd) or Geelong's last season (finished 2nd). We've had just as similar run with injuries the last couple of seasons as we had in 2012. There were nothing unusual about our injuries in 2012. Injuries are a part of football.

The only reason a few injuries effected us so badly was because we were too reliant on too few and when some of those few went down without anyone to take up the slack we wen't to shit with no one to fill the holes left.

Teams with good lists can lose good players and they bring in a good kid to fill in for a few weeks or another member of the 22 steps up. We didn't have that in 2012 because our list was too damn thin! We didn't have good kids running around in the reserves. We had 1 decent key forward and 1 or two decent key backs and no one to step up if they went down.

In 2012 we couldn't afford to lose Waite, Henderson, Carrazzo or Jamison like the cats could Hawkins or the Hawks could lose Franklin and Roughead. We couldn't afford to lose Carrazzo, Judd or Murphy because the players after them were no good. Hawks can still win without Hodge, Mitchell and Rioli just fine. Cats lose Ablett and win the flag next year. Our list overachieved and had a good run in 2011 when the bottom 4 of the top 8 was really poor quality and we had a good run with injury and people god over excited about it.

I just hate the injury excuse for 2012, we would have done ok had we had 0 injuries but it's unrealistic. Good teams can cope with a few injuries. Our list wasn't good enough to.

First three games hype
We beat Richmond (finished 12th), Brisbane (finished 13th) and Collingwood (finished 4th and started 2012 poorly) in the first three rounds and people thought we were going to be up there :rolleyes:.

Other
- Eddie wanted to leave and he left to be near his family and earn big dollars. Sam Jacobs was the best of 4 ruckmen we had once, Ratten let him go, probably could have kept him if we gave him the number one ruck role and a few extra dollars. Ratten Let Grigg go for Collins, Grigg would easily be getting a game with us. If players don't want to stay let them go! The club is bigger than any one player!

- Jamison, Simpson, Mclean, Armfield, Waite, Carrazzo, Kreuzer, Henderson, Garlett, Thomas and Tuohy were at their peak a few years ago, many of them are too old and can't run like they used to or are carring injury, if you want to blame a few injuries for not performing you can do it with this years group too. As for Garlett, you can ask him why he dropps his head going for marks and refuses to chase. Not Micks fault we have guys with poor attitudes who can't hack a challenge.

- How do you know Waite, Tuohy and Garlett aren't injured? Waite is injured at the moment and Tuohy has lost a lot of his pace which is obvious and a fitness thing. You can ask Waite and Garlett why they wont chase or do the team things. I haven't got time for poor attitudes and neither does the coach. Their the ones who can't get a kick, nothing to do with the coach.
- Judd played most of last year and hardly played this year. A lot of our past success comes from Judd and we are half the team without him up and firing.

- Ratten and Hughes ran the list into the ground to where it is now. Who do you recon missed opportunities to trade Bower, Thornton, Russell etc but kept them until he finally figured out they weren't much good? Ratten's job was to cut the list and decide who to trade, he hardly traded anyone in the end and kept anyone who could half play, we didn't have hardly any decent trades where we won under Ratten. Ratten threw away pick 11 to get Mclean. We could have had Talia and Fyfe instead of Lucas and Mclean! Ratten kept signing Joseph up who wasn't good enough. Let Grigg/Jacobs go for nothing, that's the same or worse than the Laidler thing people keep banging on about. Hughes who was an ordinary recruiter who had a patch between 2009-2012 we he hardly drafted anyone, it's killing out list now. The amount of 1st round picks he wasted as well! Malthouse has brought in guys like Docherty and Everitt for stuff all and traded out players who couldn't play.

- Our team is losing because our players aren't very good. Our players aren't very good because Hughes was a very poor recruiter and Ratten was a very ordinary judge of talent and projecting how good a young player would become and hung on to average players for too long and wasn't able to figure out who to trade.

Our injuries were far worse than what you're prepared to acknowledge. We had to bring in Casbout off a half game in the Bullants reserves to ruck at one stage FFS. The week before, when we were already undermanned, we lost a player in the warm up and then two players by half time! Murphy and Carazzo missed large chunks of the season. Kreuzer rarely if ever played, Ditto Waite. Judd four week suspension (we were a one man team remember?). Not only that, but you then go on to use injuries as an excuse for Malthouse's poor performance, only the players you use as examples are still playing! But injuries under the Ratten tenure, players who actually weren't playing for large parts of the season aren't an excuse for for Ratts? And you criticise Ratten for letting players like Grigg go (not that he had a choice) but when they leave under Mick it's 'if they want to leave then let them leave no player is bigger than the club'. Not only that but Betts>>>>Grigg the two don't even compare. So forgive me if I feel we should agree to disagree because it's getting a little ridiculous, you're contradicting yourself left right and centre and are obviously steadfast in your views. I agree our list is not a world beating list but I reiterate we should be doing a whole lot better than we are doing and that is far from Ratts fault, but this is the general view of those who wanted him gone at the time.
 
Last edited:
Hendo stretched out nicely against the Saints, he has kicked a bag of six this year, not the performance of a player who is injured. He may be carrying a niggle but that is stock standard for most footballers at this time of the year.
 
You have a bit of an obsession with MM - and play devil's advocate on just about every post. Sort of thing I'd expect from a Collingwood supporter.
no obsession- if you read all of my comments i have also stated a few times, is it micks fault that the list is where its at i say no its not. Is he a bad coach.. not from what i believe, all i have stated is that he is arrogant and is doing carlton, my team, no favours with being so god damned arrogant. He is the head coach, so he should just Deal with it!
 
Look you need to realise something.

A: I don't buy into rumours, so don't bother using them as an argument against me.

B: You're doing an awful job of trying to discredit me.
Call them rumours. I call them facts because I know them to be true.



And you don't buy into them because it doesn't fit your anti Mick agenda.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top