Yeah it would be in that case, for sure.Isn't that then more an issue of the venue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeah it would be in that case, for sure.Isn't that then more an issue of the venue?
It's possible someone with IBS was nearby, who hasn't been able to fart safely in public for many years. Clearly I was mocking them with my disrespectful behaviorsLike everything, subject to opinion.
I don't think so, but there's a minuscule minority that would probably want you locked up. If you're company is averse to what is considered punishable pr like the AFL thinks (which they don't, they just want to be seen as moral to the lowest common denominator, even though everyone can see the transparency), then I wouldn't be.
Crime and punishment and all that.
Be careful, mocking is punishable.It's possible someone with IBS was nearby, who hasn't been able to fart safely in public for many years. Clearly I was mocking them with my disrespectful behaviors
A lot of people have that misunderstanding - it isn't about whether or not Nick Nat was offended.It's another version of Nik Nat being told he needs to be offended by a kid who idolises him dressing up to look like him.
Lets be honest if this had happened in Victoria, SA or WA it wouldn't have seen the light of day for obvious reasons, but NSW is not Victoria or SA or WA.Complete madness by the AFL
And this is the problem, there's a minuscule minority that will be offended on NN's behalf for no reason, or worse use 'blackface' in bad faith coz they got an axe to grind.it isn't about whether or not Nick Nat was offended.
It's about the historic problem with Blackface.
Is it about offence or not being a campaigner?And this is the problem, there's a minuscule minority that will be offended on NN's behalf for no reason, or worse use 'blackface' in bad faith coz they got an axe to grind.
So then society bends over backwards to appease the phuq all and no one.
MSM and social media made a big unwarranted song and dance about it, despite NN's meh response, in fact he was flattered.
But oh nooo, we must find offence, and these offence finders who number very few have to be pandered to, appease the lynch mob!
It's all over reactionary.
And this is why Jan and Joe public get pissed off, msm and social media give all the attention to the very few irrational bleeding hearts, then Jan and Joe public start believing that broader society are also bleeding hearts, then everyone falls in line.
Jan and Joe public are now disenfranchised with society somewhat.
This gws debacle just another example.
They unwittingly exposed themselves to the woke-washers of the AFL defending the purity of their own gambling-funded bloated salariesSo I don't have to search through 75 pages, can someone please direct me to a post that outlines exactly what they did?
Seems excessive.
Giddy didn't diddle Diddy but did do a kiddie.No Diddy! No giddy!
Intelligence is not their strong point obviously.What stands out to me is a complete lack of awareness by the leadership group, they just stood by and let it happen. Like the last quarter of the semi-final! This and the exodus aside I can't see them making the eight next year.
Depends on one's view, campaigner or offended.Is it about offence or not being a campaigner?
Do you think blackface is ok?
Whoa there turbo. No, I don’t know what was in the skit, but I do know it was enough for some fairly harsh punishment, as has played out. We may never know what the skits involved, but if the players don’t appeal, which so far they haven’t, it would be fair to assume it wasn’t nothing.So on that basis you and I should have no view because neither of us have seen the skit. Are you prepared to drop your criticisms based on this. Let me qualify it. Idon doing a skit based on a fight scene from Django Unchained can not be judged by a group of white people assuming the basis of the skit is true to the film.
Does that work for you. Don't you feel uncomfortable with a man of African heritage being told how he can interpret a slavery based skit by a sports body.
I agree, and I said in other posts I am not a lefty who censors or wants to ruin people, but I have my opinions to give like anyone else.Thats a harsh call. A broad brush of society have always enjoyed dark humour and poking at terrible historical events. There is a video posted here of a whole range of comedians doing jokes about 9:11. Dark humour often stastains us and lets us release on serious painful subjects. Your sensibilities are to be respected if you dont like that form of humour but to imply if you do you are a loser who will be socially ousted just doesnt sit with reality for me
The state, employers or people who seek to censor others thoughts, actions, books read , films watched etc should be approached with care. You dont have to like what other people like or say but outside some pretty strict guidelines to want to censor them is a slippery slope.
I mean the two things are unrelated, but you knew that.Was the AFL this concerned about women when they fixtured some of them to play five games in 20 days?
Tip my hat to you, respectI was, Navy, best job I ever had.
For once I agree with Swan. This is peak gen z preciousness. Only in 2024 could we find such minimal things to get worked up about.View attachment 2146509
Ken oath!
An 'historic' problem, which no one in 2024 was around to personally experience.A lot of people have that misunderstanding - it isn't about whether or not Nick Nat was offended.
It's about the historic problem with Blackface. Now I originally thought (maybe still do) that that is an American thing and nothing really to do with us - but we live in a globally connected world these days so we tend to get a bit of US culture imparted upon us.
I was making a point, but you knew that.I mean the two things are unrelated, but you knew that.
No, you were making a scarecrowI was making a point, but you knew that.
I think this comes down to personal opinions here. For mine this is just off topic given the sickening nature of terrorism, poke fun at the terrorists, but don’t poke fun of the tragedy itself.Doesn't that come down to 'too soon'?
Common sense says the individual needs to choose their audience wisely, which by the sounds of it, they tried to do.
Hypothetically, I wonder how an 'evil woman' themed night would have been responded to. Would the GWS AFLW captain be upset if Coniglio dressed as Leonarda Cianciulli carrying around a few bars of soap?
On motorola edge 30 pro using BigFooty.com mobile app