- Nov 6, 2014
- 64,041
- 81,203
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Even pissier weak by Tex amd your mobLULZ, McDermot reckons he's lucky he didnt get sacked.
D/H
Piss week sanction by the Leadership group" tho.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Even pissier weak by Tex amd your mobLULZ, McDermot reckons he's lucky he didnt get sacked.
D/H
Piss week sanction by the Leadership group" tho.
Even pissier weak by Tex amd your mob
Flog
Even floggier post by a flog
Biggest flog of all !!!
My my - a broken jaw and six weeks compared to a trip to the pub and a NAB Cup game
View attachment 225120
Victim blaming? But in all seriousness if it was a King hit then he has been very unfortunate and his punishment is more severe than either cROACH or Atkins (yes you had TWO on the piss.) If it turns out he instigated a fight then the sanctions given by the club are not severe enough and will be reviewed. So far I am impressed by our club and the way they have handled it. Krak's behaviour is disappointing. He has worked so hard to lose the weight (how's FattycROACH going with that?) and to pull himself back from where he was and now has almost thrown away all that hard work and talent. Some people never learn sadly.Cant recall Crows players being punched out at a night club, on the piss whilst injured!!
I can well imagine.If anyone wants a fun read, go check out the "Jaensch - broken jaw after attack" thread on the Crows board and compare their reaction
one person who has done wrong, vs a skipper and team that wont embrace a booze ban that a coach wanted. adelaide always striving for mediocrity
So you're saying we won't make the 8? Shall we have a wager in this?
one person who has done wrong, vs a skipper and team that wont embrace a booze ban that a coach wanted. adelaide always striving for mediocrity
"Oneclub" that has sanctions that aren't even sanctions. Can't train with the main group - so what? His injury keeps him away from training with the main group.
Can't play for 6 weeks - another so what ? That's how long it will take to get over this injury !
That's embracing crap behaviour by a soft soft leadership group.
Maybe if you hadn't recruited Drug Cheats you would be able to sanction players properly.
But , ya did.
one person who has done wrong, vs a skipper and team that wont embrace a booze ban that a coach wanted. adelaide always striving for mediocrity
And I notice how you studiously now avoid the reference you made regarding the alcohol ban.your avoiding the same exact thing happening to jaensch....
Except Jaensch you all were up in arms about how bad it was for him and how who ever hit him should be brought up on charges, poor guy etc....
Adelaide supporters tune has changed with this incident tho?
Impressed with the non- penalty are you ?Victim blaming? But in all seriousness if it was a King hit then he has been very unfortunate and his punishment is more severe than either cROACH or Atkins (yes you had TWO on the piss.) If it turns out he instigated a fight then the sanctions given by the club are not severe enough and will be reviewed. So far I am impressed by our club and the way they have handled it. Krak's behaviour is disappointing. He has worked so hard to lose the weight (how's FattycROACH going with that?) and to pull himself back from where he was and now has almost thrown away all that hard work and talent. Some people never learn sadly.
Impressed with the non- penalty are you ?
Enlighten yourself.
No-one is blaming him , but why expose yourself to the possibility of this in the first place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_victimology
Abuse in general[edit]
The lifestyle/exposure theory is a model of victimology that posits that the likelihood an individual will suffer a personal victimization depends heavily upon the concept of life style. The lifestyle theory is constructed upon several premises. The most important of the premises are:
The rest of your post is offended nonsense and is subsequently ignored
- The uneven distribution of criminal victimization across space and time. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk places and high-risk times.
- Offenders do not constitute a representative sample of the general population. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk persons.
- Lifestyle determines the likelihood of personal victimization through the intervening variables of exposure and association.
- People are not equally exposed to high-risk places and times, and they vary in the degree to which they associate with high-risk persons. This translates to a persons lifestyle influencing the exposure and association with high-risk persons. [1]
sighImpressed with the non- penalty are you ?
Enlighten yourself.
No-one is blaming him , but why expose yourself to the possibility of this in the first place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_victimology
Abuse in general[edit]
The lifestyle/exposure theory is a model of victimology that posits that the likelihood an individual will suffer a personal victimization depends heavily upon the concept of life style. The lifestyle theory is constructed upon several premises. The most important of the premises are:
The rest of your post is offended nonsense and is subsequently ignored
- The uneven distribution of criminal victimization across space and time. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk places and high-risk times.
- Offenders do not constitute a representative sample of the general population. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk persons.
- Lifestyle determines the likelihood of personal victimization through the intervening variables of exposure and association.
- People are not equally exposed to high-risk places and times, and they vary in the degree to which they associate with high-risk persons. This translates to a persons lifestyle influencing the exposure and association with high-risk persons. [1]
As usual
No argument ....
But keep trying.