- Sep 6, 2010
- 32,284
- 54,214
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Swamprats
- Banned
- #151
I got all day ....keep trying....
Meanwhile it just gets better and better
Krak Filler View attachment 225427
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I got all day ....keep trying....
Meanwhile it just gets better and better
Krak Filler View attachment 225427
Depth player.
Squibb.
Weren't you supposed to have the Clangers avatar for the whole year?maybe for the Maggies my friend, that shit truck would be lucky to get a game with the mighty crows
Weren't you supposed to have the Clangers avatar for the whole year?
Just asking. Clangers suited you nicely.Month from memory, I cbf looking back but no doubt you are obsessively searching for it.
Personally I hope Mitchell plays many a game this year How about you?
Just asking. Clangers suited you nicely.
Are you hoping we get injuries so Mitchell gets a game? Sounds like an injury troll
Maybe I'll have a look later if I can be botheredSo no prospect of the black flags for me then, bad luck flog.
David Mackay, Nathan van Berlol, Josh Jenkins boards.Playing John Butcher, Kane Mitchell and Pittard- #concerning
I guess it cant be any worse than playing Van Berlol, Mookay and possibly Menzel #concerningSo no prospect of the black flags for me then, bad luck flog.
Playing John Butcher, Kane Mitchell and Pittard- #concerning
Impressed with the non- penalty are you ?
Enlighten yourself.
No-one is blaming him , but why expose yourself to the possibility of this in the first place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_victimology
Abuse in general[edit]
The lifestyle/exposure theory is a model of victimology that posits that the likelihood an individual will suffer a personal victimization depends heavily upon the concept of life style. The lifestyle theory is constructed upon several premises. The most important of the premises are:
The rest of your post is offended nonsense and is subsequently ignored
- The uneven distribution of criminal victimization across space and time. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk places and high-risk times.
- Offenders do not constitute a representative sample of the general population. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk persons.
- Lifestyle determines the likelihood of personal victimization through the intervening variables of exposure and association.
- People are not equally exposed to high-risk places and times, and they vary in the degree to which they associate with high-risk persons. This translates to a persons lifestyle influencing the exposure and association with high-risk persons. [1]
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...h/news-story/e134726e981e9e772028aa8b2da3eb97
Even The Roach reckons it's a soft penalty ...
"While Krakouer is nursing a broken jaw, the order to stay away from the main training group until April 3 and to be banned from AFL selection until May 8 is moot."
So basically no penalty ..
( see that D_one - that's moot not " mute")
"Port Adelaide’s leadership group was swift in condemning Krakouer, but the first punishment imposed may need a follow-up penalty when the defender is clear of injury."
Swift ? 3 days later ?????
Since when would someone with a broken jaw train with the main group anyway ?
"Oneclub" that has sanctions that aren't even sanctions. Can't train with the main group - so what? His injury keeps him away from training with the main group.
Can't play for 6 weeks - another so what ? That's how long it will take to get over this injury !
That's embracing crap behaviour by a soft soft leadership group.
Maybe if you hadn't recruited Drug Cheats you would be able to sanction players properly.
But , ya did.
We would have, had you not all jumped on the Crouch and Atkins bandwagon of "club kulcha" caused this.
Not one Crows poster defended their actions - all stating along the lines of dumb thing to do, penalty adequate and lets hope they learn.
This player has had several chances - your club recruited him knowing his past history. He hasn't learnt and judging by the soft penalty, he won't. The only reason you can't **** him off is that you've ****ed up by recruiting Ryder and Monfries.
Seems your club greats don't fancy an alcohol ban.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...h/news-story/3c2c81cefe414cd8ed5559ce82f5dd17
“These things don’t happen if you avoid going out in the wee hours of the morning,” he said. Port Adelaide premiership captain Warren Tredrea last night insisted only injured players should be under an alcohol ban. But he also took the incident as a pointer to the new risks players face in public.
“It requires a calculated decision on where you go and when to minimise that risk,” he said. “I always think of (coach) Mark Williams’ quote: ‘Nothing good happens after 2am’.”
Former St Kilda and Power defender Darryl Wakelin also opposed zero-tolerance to alcohol. But he noted players should avoid nightclubs, saying: “With what is out there today, particularly with drugs, those places always seem to lead to a blue.”
“These things don’t happen if you avoid going out in the wee hours of the morning,” he said. Port Adelaide premiership captain Warren Tredrea last night insisted only injured players should be under an alcohol ban. But he also took the incident as a pointer to the new risks players face in public.
As for "mediocrity" that is the definition of the penalty he has. The penalty you get when you're not getting a penalty.
And I notice how you studiously now avoid the reference you made regarding the alcohol ban.
I'm talking about your quotes regarding Crouch and Atkins and that it showed a club with bad kulcha.
The way all you puffers went over the top on that incident was particularly stupid.
And in light of events this year where your club has exposed itself to drug cheats and party boys, any criticism leveled at your club following the criticism of Adelaide Football Club is more than justified.
Impressed with the non- penalty are you ?
Enlighten yourself.
No-one is blaming him , but why expose yourself to the possibility of this in the first place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theories_of_victimology
Abuse in general[edit]
The lifestyle/exposure theory is a model of victimology that posits that the likelihood an individual will suffer a personal victimization depends heavily upon the concept of life style. The lifestyle theory is constructed upon several premises. The most important of the premises are:
The rest of your post is offended nonsense and is subsequently ignored
- The uneven distribution of criminal victimization across space and time. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk places and high-risk times.
- Offenders do not constitute a representative sample of the general population. This translates to the occurrence of high-risk persons.
- Lifestyle determines the likelihood of personal victimization through the intervening variables of exposure and association.
- People are not equally exposed to high-risk places and times, and they vary in the degree to which they associate with high-risk persons. This translates to a persons lifestyle influencing the exposure and association with high-risk persons. [1]
Maybe I'll have a look later if I can be bothered
David Mackay, Nathan van Berlol, Josh Jenkins boards.
It's 2016 nowJosh Jenkins (our 3rd tall) would be your best tall forward based on 2015 figures
It's 2016 now
I couldn't give a rat's arse about 2015.So you admit he wouldve been your best forward last year? Despite him being a spud?
#concerning times for Port Power
I couldn't give a rat's arse about 2015.
Keep living in the past, chump.
There's a reason he wasn't elevated from the rookie list.
Your thoughts on how the two leadership groups handled the situations?
Really ???
Not upgraded ? Sure about that?
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport...h/news-story/3c2c81cefe414cd8ed5559ce82f5dd17
Port Adelaide loses upgraded rookie Nathan Krakouer with broken jaw after nightclub incident in Perth
Insufferable flog that doesn't even know the players on the list !
Time to cancel another account D_One
I couldn't give a rat's arse about 2015.
Keep living in the past, chump.
And don't quote me again.
The obsession continues
Quote - D_One
'there's a reason he wasn't elevated from the rookie list ...."
You've been doing all the puffing, I've just simply offered up a bet on your claims and you went to water.
You've been doing all the puffing, I've just simply offered up a bet on your claims and you went to water.
Lol, nah mate, why bet against an alias? But, given I wasn't quoting you in the post, am I getting in your head a bit?
Sent from my iPad using righteous man power.
Lol, **** you.Lol, **** me, ironic comment is ironic from a puffer.
Sent from my iPad using righteous man power.