Copeland
ABZ
Is he trying to not get injured? I remember him last year better in the ruck.Freddy is below average.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is he trying to not get injured? I remember him last year better in the ruck.Freddy is below average.
There will be an asterisk though because the games straddle the bye.
I’d watch McStays effort against Oscar McInerney before calling him a better ruckman than anyone. But even he is being a bees dick better than Kreuger for 5 minutes a quarter in the ruck doesn’t warrant the loss of quality in the forwardline.
People really overrating the need for a genuine second ruck in here. All we need from a second ruck is a contest.
Richmond won a flag with 190cm Shaun Grigg doing stuff all as a second ruckPeople really overrating the need for a genuine second ruck in here. All we need from a second ruck is a contest. Then we do what we did against Melbourne and Gawn. Assume we’ll lose the hitout and set up accordingly. Yes, it’s nice to have a second ruck who can act as a first ruck, but it doesn’t outweigh what Freddy brings to the table as a forward/ruck imo, both from an offensive and forward defensive perspective.
And sir Scott burnsI have a hunch he'll be fine from now on. I remember Darcy Moore couldn't get on the park for years and now he's one of our most durable. Same with Curnow.
Good for him. May it pave the way for many moreIf Kruegs plays, it'll be the first time in his career that he's managed 3 consecutive games.
Scott was the ultimate fool soldier. Such a great playerAnd sir Scott burns
A game where he attended a total of zero ruck contests and won zero hit outs?I dunno, I might suggest you watch McStay's efforts in the last quarter of the '22 Final against Max Gawn??
I don't wanna see McStay or Kreuger 2nd rucking. This season thats Cox's job.
With McStay coming off a reco, I reckon we would be very hesitant to give him ruck time. I hope that freddy continues to improve and would like to go with freddy and Cameron. The problem is can we go with Mihocek, freddy and McStay in the same sideA game where he attended a total of zero ruck contests and won zero hit outs?
I’d rather neither ruck and Cox get the second ruck role as well, but in the situation in which Kreuger, McStay and Mihocek are in the same team I’d prefer the second ruck to be Kreuger.
There’s a passage of play late in Q3 versus the Kangas not long after Freddie kicked his goal where he dropped an easy mark from a McCreery kick out of D50, Naicos gathered and handballed it forward into Freddie’s path and he ran and tapped it forward a couple of times under pressure then soccered it into F50 and then sprinted away from his opponent to lay a great tackle on McDonald.
So it started with an error but I loved the 2nd, 3rd and 4th efforts, as well as remarkable acceleration and agility for such a big bloke.
I reckon there’s huge upside to Freddie if he can finally get an extended run at it. I hope we keep playing him until he either becomes a Best 23 lock or breaks down again.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
A concern though is what happens if Cameron is not going well like in last year’s GF? Without Cox’s ruck work we wouldn’t be premiers.People really overrating the need for a genuine second ruck in here. All we need from a second ruck is a contest. Then we do what we did against Melbourne and Gawn. Assume we’ll lose the hitout and set up accordingly. Yes, it’s nice to have a second ruck who can act as a first ruck, but it doesn’t outweigh what Freddy brings to the table as a forward/ruck imo, both from an offensive and forward defensive perspective.
Scott was the ultimate fool soldier. Such a great player
We can go with those 3 if Cox isn't fit ... Freddy essentially playing the 2nd ruck forward role replacing Cox. Last years prelim we had Cameron ,Cox, McStay and Checkers .. The problem is can we go with Mihocek, freddy and McStay in the same side
Is Kroog a competent ruckman, no. But I don't think McStay is great either. At their best, they are just barely good enough for a true 2nd ruckman.
However, we also don't need 20+ hitouts from wither of them either.
DC has been solid and could carry 70% of the ruck duties and filling defensive holes behind play.
If we got 15% ruck duties out of both of Kroog and D-Mac, it'll be better for our forward structure.
Then we won't have to bring in AJ as a small key position forward who can't ruck at all.
Normally i'd agree....except our gamestyle isn't that of other teams.People really overrating the need for a genuine second ruck in here. All we need from a second ruck is a contest. Then we do what we did against Melbourne and Gawn. Assume we’ll lose the hitout and set up accordingly. Yes, it’s nice to have a second ruck who can act as a first ruck, but it doesn’t outweigh what Freddy brings to the table as a forward/ruck imo, both from an offensive and forward defensive perspective.
I’m not sure you can definitively say that. Cox’s ruck work was certainly handy to have, but I’m not sure it was match winning. As already stated, if we’re expecting to lose a ruck contest we can always set up accordingly. The KB game was a perfect example of this. Gawn absolutely destroyed Cameron, and the club expected it, yet because we set up for that eventuality we ended up winning clearances convincingly.A concern though is what happens if Cameron is not going well like in last year’s GF? Without Cox’s ruck work we wouldn’t be premiers.
I dunno, I might suggest you watch McStay's efforts in the last quarter of the '22 Final against Max Gawn??
I don't wanna see McStay or Kreuger 2nd rucking. This season thats Cox's job.
Cameron’s job was essentially to give enough of a contest that Gawn had an incentive to keep hitting to his preferred/easier side rather than letting him get cute. Beating him or even matching him was unnecessary. Mischief managed.Gawn absolutely destroyed Cameron, and the club expected it, yet because we set up for that eventuality we ended up winning clearances convincingly.