- Feb 5, 2010
- 7,140
- 10,589
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, Australia
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They dropped the wrong one!Crowies are sticking with the current clash. Have dropped the yellow alternate.
View attachment 446709
Saw the Carlton jumper at the shop.
- CFC is raised. The shading effect is where it is raised higher in some places than others. New printing material as opposed to the puffiness of previous versions
- All logos are printed, including AFL
- the 'white' in the collar is actually grey
- The V neck is not stitched at the front, one piece overlaps the other
- This is the authentic on-field version
IMG_3120.JPG
IMG_3121.JPG
Monogram looks el cheapo heat pressed compared to the PI’s of the last few years that were heat pressed aswell but had that fake stitching that made them look more real. I think printed would have been better over this
Monogram looks el cheapo heat pressed compared to the PI’s of the last few years that were heat pressed aswell but had that fake stitching that made them look more real. I think printed would have been better over this
Do you have pics of the retail ? Are they going to sell the on field this year again ?
So all the logos are heat printed and not sublimated?
That is cheap as.
The on-field and retail are one and the same they told me. Nike obviously found a cheaper way of doing it.
The women's has the shading but it's sublimated.
Design-wise, he means. Same template, except for the obvious PI additions.They can't be the exact same, the player guernseys would have GPS pockets.
Is the navy the same darkness as before ? I was hoping they would go back to the lighter navy like the womens guernsey
Only said DRI-FIT on the player guernseys last season, didn't have it on replicas.
Since now they are apparently the same I don't it will be anywhere.
It has DRI-FIT on the inner tag.
Not on the front of the guernsey though, which I was referring to.
were you expecting generalisations?Man, there are some details in this thread.
I edited it and added a smiley face.Now now...