What happened? Oppo clubs testimony is taken very lightly due to clubs helping each other out for future incidents.Appeals is a joke, despite 2 Boro players testifying the alleged charge did not occur.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What happened? Oppo clubs testimony is taken very lightly due to clubs helping each other out for future incidents.Appeals is a joke, despite 2 Boro players testifying the alleged charge did not occur.
McCormick 1 match. Ran past the ball, high contract, taunted the said player after. Genuinely cannot understand the NFNL tribunal sometimes.
Umpires testimony may have saved him if he only judged it “free kick” worthy.
I’d say your actions after an incident can impact the penalty.Never seen a report reading ‘high contact and taunted said player after’.
Not sure why you mentioned that.
McCormick 1 match. Ran past the ball, high contract, taunted the said player after. Genuinely cannot understand the NFNL tribunal sometimes.
Umpires testimony may have saved him if he only judged it “free kick” worthy.
Denny Crane flaw is with the NFNL, all set penalties should be reviewed.No tribunal when offered set penalty of one week and took it.
Flaw is in NFNL set penalties not the tribunal.
If Lentini misses the next 3 games due to concussion protocols then this is a disgraceful decision - If there was no concussion and the incident looked worse on the footage than what it was ie: umpire got it right and just minor contact justifying a free kick then play on. If Lentini misses 3 games due to concussion protocols (We will know tomorrow) then this is a disgraceful NFNL decision for both Lentini and Monty and simply not good enough.Denny Crane flaw is with the NFNL, all set penalties should be reviewed.
This was a weak act and deserved more than a week
Denny Crane flaw is with the NFNL, all set penalties should be reviewed.
This was a weak act and deserved more than a week
If Lentini misses the next 3 games due to concussion protocols then this is a disgraceful decision - If there was no concussion and the incident looked worse on the footage than what it was ie: umpire got it right and just minor contact justifying a free kick then play on. If Lentini misses 3 games due to concussion protocols (We will know tomorrow) then this is a disgraceful NFNL decision for both Lentini and Monty and simply not good enough.
I guess we will all make a judgement call tomorrow.
Umpire only payed a free no card at the time but after the game decided it was worth a week??? Surely if the umpire thinks its worth a week its worth a yellow at minimum. Time to think about it??No tribunal when offered set penalty of one week and took it.
Flaw is in NFNL set penalties not the tribunal.
Wasnt a tribunal case as far as i can seeMcCormick 1 match. Ran past the ball, high contract, taunted the said player after. Genuinely cannot understand the NFNL tribunal sometimes.
Umpires testimony may have saved him if he only judged it “free kick” worthy.
The umpire can write in his notes “investigate bump midway through third”Umpire only payed a free no card at the time but after the game decided it was worth a week??? Surely if the umpire thinks its worth a week its worth a yellow at minimum. Time to think about it??
Must be getting close to the 16 matches suspended that results in a life ban3 week suspension for the North captain.
I thought the set penalty's where offered by the ump straight after the match following a match day report. Player either excepts the penalty or decides to go to the tribunal and try there luck??The umpire can write in his notes “investigate bump midway through third”
And the league will look at it and offer a set penalty, or montmorency report it and offer a set penalty.
Regardless it’s mind boggling how he got away with a week when comparing other incidents over the years. Anyway hopefully he learns his lesson and doesn’t do that again.
Nup, they are reviewed. Red card they are offered 2 weeks to acceptI thought the set penalty's where offered by the ump straight after the match following a match day report. Player either excepts the penalty or decides to go to the tribunal and try there luck??
What happened? Oppo clubs testimony is taken very lightly due to clubs helping each other out for future incidents.
What is mind boggling is that he can’t get a game at the Bullants, he should not have even been at Central psrk…The umpire can write in his notes “investigate bump midway through third”
And the league will look at it and offer a set penalty, or montmorency report it and offer a set penalty.
Regardless it’s mind boggling how he got away with a week when comparing other incidents over the years. Anyway hopefully he learns his lesson and doesn’t do that again.
What is mind boggling is that he can’t get a game at the Bullants, he should not have even been at Central psrk…
He is good enough to be playing at the Bullants, how they haven’t been picking him is a mystery.What do you mean?
He’s just a playerHe is good enough to be playing at the Bullants, how they haven’t been picking him is a mystery.
Got the week for a sling tackle I believe. Very fortunate.He’s just a player
Also, his week was for another incident. He didn’t get suspended for the Lentini incident
Maybe the bump wasn’t high….Got the week for a sling tackle I believe. Very fortunate.