Opinion NMFC Board Cricket ThreadII - Windies, Big Bash, Pakistan.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Possibly a mark on wristband but a guess at best. A bruise on the arm. On field umps say not out. 3rd umpire should have given benefit to batsman. Inconclusive evidence at best. Horrible decision really. Game changer
 
Possibly a mark on wristband but a guess at best. A bruise on the arm. On field umps say not out. 3rd umpire should have given benefit to batsman. Inconclusive evidence at best. Horrible decision really. Game changer
super obvious it hit his glove, the "wristband" is his glove, not anything controversial at all
 
But did it hit his wristband. That possible spot is so small it could be anything. Its guess work at best. Why do you think it took so long to make a decision. On field umpire said not out. Its changed the game in the end. I hope we get to see a picture of any bruise on the arm. That will be the most critical factor
 
But did it hit his wristband. That possible spot is so small it could be anything. Its guess work at best. Why do you think it took so long to make a decision. On field umpire said not out. Its changed the game in the end. I hope we get to see a picture of any bruise on the arm. That will be the most critical factor
it's not, it hit his glove, you can tell from watching the replay. Also, no, a bruise would not be conclusive in any way, it's a piece of fabric, not going to stop a bruise happening.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top