Rumour No more Mrs Hardwick

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
we already have, and their stance is interesting, because it flies in the face of the standard the AFL set with the Lethlean and Simpkin case. And I hate to keep referencing that but a precedent is important.

This is what I know, not think.

The club, Peggy and Brendon will back Dimma as far as they can, there is some sort of alliance there of protecting each other, and it makes sense in a business and success sense.

If you think morals rule the playground, think again.

I think the club will do everything they can to make this seem as innocent as possible.

They have successfully swept many things under the carpet, some things that you don't know and I could blow this forum up with revelations.

Keep referencing it if you like but at least get the names right. It’s Simkiss not Simpkin. Bad error from someone who knows everyone involved in the AFL.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Of course I know it, but I'm not going to be that guy, sorry.

The paper already revealed that he is an exec at carlton,

If only there was someone at Carlton that used to be at Richmond and would have been her boss at richmond that is the 'main riddle' to figure out here.
 
we already have, and their stance is interesting, because it flies in the face of the standard the AFL set with the Lethlean and Simpkin case. And I hate to keep referencing that but a precedent is important.

This is what I know, not think.

The club, Peggy and Brendon will back Dimma as far as they can, there is some sort of alliance there of protecting each other, and it makes sense in a business and success sense.

If you think morals rule the playground, think again.

I think the club will do everything they can to make this seem as innocent as possible.

They have successfully swept many things under the carpet, some things that you don't know and I could blow this forum up with revelations.
then do it either prove it or quit acting like someone whos itk
 
The paper already revealed that he is an exec at carlton,

If only there was someone at Carlton that used to be at Richmond and would have been her boss at richmond that is the 'main riddle' to figure out here.

It's not Cain Liddle. Look harder.
 
Ill put on my serious hat now

Been told by someone at the Eagles that Hardwick will be sacked. Its not really just about this particular issue but a accumulation of things. Wont be sacked by Richmond, but will instead come as a directive from the AFL itself as the breaches are not Richmond related, they are hub/AFL related
You are great value on this site. Keep it up bud!
 
i don't like replying to you you're wasting my time.
I know I ask awkward questions which throws your hang em high argument out.

I suspect you are emotionally attached To this issue and it is clouded your thinking.
Employers Cannot dictate to someone not to have a relationship with another worker.
Great to see RFC standing by Hardwick, as they should.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I’m going to throw a new theory in the ring...

I reckon Crow flew out of the old club amidst her breakup with the old club staffer. Landed a new job at the tiges in 2019 and so on...
 
I’m going to throw a new theory in the ring...

I reckon Crow flew out of the old club amidst her breakup with the old club staffer. Landed a new job at the tiges in 2019 and so on...
Crow been working at Richmond since like 2016
 
I know I ask awkward questions which throws your hang em high argument out.

I suspect you are emotionally attached To this issue and it is clouded your thinking.
Employers Cannot dictate to someone not to have a relationship with another worker.
Great to see RFC standing by Hardwick, as they should.

how can you say Employers cannot dictate to someone not to have a relationship with another worker when the AFL sacked two of their executives for doing exactly that ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top