- May 14, 2012
- 8,271
- 13,107
- AFL Club
- Geelong
If a female coach of an AFLW team was having an affair with Sally from accounts payable, would anybody give a toss.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
we can agree on thatFair enough.
Agree to disagree.
For what it’s worth if he has done what has been speculated, it’s a low act to his wife and children, and really feel they’ll cop all this bs the most.
we already have, and their stance is interesting, because it flies in the face of the standard the AFL set with the Lethlean and Simpkin case. And I hate to keep referencing that but a precedent is important.
This is what I know, not think.
The club, Peggy and Brendon will back Dimma as far as they can, there is some sort of alliance there of protecting each other, and it makes sense in a business and success sense.
If you think morals rule the playground, think again.
I think the club will do everything they can to make this seem as innocent as possible.
They have successfully swept many things under the carpet, some things that you don't know and I could blow this forum up with revelations.
Keep referencing it if you like but at least get the names right. It’s Simkiss not Simpkin. Bad error from someone who knows everyone involved in the AFL.
Of course I know it, but I'm not going to be that guy, sorry.
then do it either prove it or quit acting like someone whos itkwe already have, and their stance is interesting, because it flies in the face of the standard the AFL set with the Lethlean and Simpkin case. And I hate to keep referencing that but a precedent is important.
This is what I know, not think.
The club, Peggy and Brendon will back Dimma as far as they can, there is some sort of alliance there of protecting each other, and it makes sense in a business and success sense.
If you think morals rule the playground, think again.
I think the club will do everything they can to make this seem as innocent as possible.
They have successfully swept many things under the carpet, some things that you don't know and I could blow this forum up with revelations.
The paper already revealed that he is an exec at carlton,
If only there was someone at Carlton that used to be at Richmond and would have been her boss at richmond that is the 'main riddle' to figure out here.
It's not Cain Liddle. Look harder.
then do it either prove it or quit acting like someone whos itk
You are great value on this site. Keep it up bud!Ill put on my serious hat now
Been told by someone at the Eagles that Hardwick will be sacked. Its not really just about this particular issue but a accumulation of things. Wont be sacked by Richmond, but will instead come as a directive from the AFL itself as the breaches are not Richmond related, they are hub/AFL related
you clearly are acting mate joined at 7 just spouting utter nonsense and garbage and wont prove a thingnobody's acting.
I know I ask awkward questions which throws your hang em high argument out.i don't like replying to you you're wasting my time.
I reckon Crow flew out of the old club amidst her breakup with the old club staffer.
you clearly are acting mate joined at 7 just spouting utter nonsense and garbage and wont prove a thing
Crow been working at Richmond since like 2016I’m going to throw a new theory in the ring...
I reckon Crow flew out of the old club amidst her breakup with the old club staffer. Landed a new job at the tiges in 2019 and so on...
just proving my point you wont prove anything so there is no reason to believe youthink what you want.
I know I ask awkward questions which throws your hang em high argument out.
I suspect you are emotionally attached To this issue and it is clouded your thinking.
Employers Cannot dictate to someone not to have a relationship with another worker.
Great to see RFC standing by Hardwick, as they should.
just proving my point you wont prove anything so there is no reason to believe you
exactlythen don't, I don't care.
Well before that.Crow been working at Richmond since like 2016
How can you say they were sacked for the relationship itself and not the fallout , internal issues and other problems the relationships caused?how can you say Employers cannot dictate to someone not to have a relationship with another worker when the AFL sacked two of their executives for doing exactly that ?
Crow been working at Richmond since like 2016