Opinion Non-Crows AFL 11: Footy's Back At Last

There's no conclusive video evidence that he touched it whatsoever.

Should not be overturned despite the way the players reacted.
Exactly!

It's not about the balance of probabilities.

Is it conclusively wrong yes or no?
Not probably, but not sure after 50 replays.
 
Exactly!

It's not about the balance of probabilities.

Is it conclusively wrong yes or no?
Not probably, but not sure after 50 replays.

There has to be clear evidence to overturn the umpire's call. The ARC umpire has just made up his own rule there.
 
Without it being conclusive the second angle showed the fingers on the ball, why they can’t split screen multiple angles at the same time I don’t know.
Pretty obvious it was touched and that’s not even taking players reactions into account.
 
Some totally weak, scared of contact moments from Tim English again tonight like last week, Dogs wasting so much of their cap on him.

Naughton not being moved back to centre half back in the last 2 seasons just another one of Beverage’s great on-field decisions.
 

Opinion Non-Crows AFL 11: Footy's Back At Last


Write your reply...
Back
Top