He's good Cripps, but he's not DangerfieldOpinions: I rate Cripps the same
I don’t have a Carlton axe to grind
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's good Cripps, but he's not DangerfieldOpinions: I rate Cripps the same
I don’t have a Carlton axe to grind
That’s ok I just see it differentlyHe's good Cripps, but he's not Dangerfield
Geelong captain and AFL Players Association president Patrick Dangerfield has declared it’s “time to shorten” quarters, adamant that record ratings and attendances wouldn’t be impacted by saying “reduce the supply and the demand goes up”.
![]()
‘It’s time’: Superstar Patrick Dangerfield calls for drastic change for AFL games… ‘cue outrage’
‘It’s time’: Superstar calls for drastic change for AFL games… ‘cue outrage’www.foxsports.com.au
Perhaps time for Dangerfield to retire & start up a T20 equivalent of AFL, where they mike the players up & make it all fancy. Could call in something like AFLX.Are they taking a reduction in pay? If not, then nope.
It’s time for him to stop trying to control the gamePerhaps time for Dangerfield to retire & start up a T20 equivalent of AFL, where they mike the players up & make it all fancy. Could call in something like AFLX.
He could easily retire & get back to recording his holiday with the Dangerfields program for channel 7.It’s time for him to stop trying to control the game
Luckily he had a very good football careerHe could easily retire & get back to recording his holiday with the Dangerfields program for channel 7.
Did anyone watch the last series?
To my eye I'm swapping Enright out for Tom Stewart.Cant argue with any of those
Yeah... but as a midfielder, not a small or medium forward.
Danger should still be in the team, but at the expense of one of the other midfielders - probably Selwood.
Thus
Betts replaces Dangerfield
Dangerfield replaces Selwood
Selwood drops out of the team
Betts should defintely be in the team. Whether that's a direct swap with Cyril Rioli, or replacing Selwood via the Dangerfield re-arrangement outlined above, really doesn't matter.
It's the same thing with AA teams, got to stuff all the midfielders in (which is probably fair, they are generally the best players).That's fair but you wouldn't have Cripps as a small forward either. Dangerfield could at least play that role if required
And yep I'd absolutely have Dangerfield in the side over Selwood
Yeah... but as a midfielder, not a small or medium forward.
Danger should still be in the team, but at the expense of one of the other midfielders - probably Selwood.
Thus
Betts replaces Dangerfield
Dangerfield replaces Selwood
Selwood drops out of the team
Betts should defintely be in the team. Whether that's a direct swap with Cyril Rioli, or replacing Selwood via the Dangerfield re-arrangement outlined above, really doesn't matter.
I wasn't suggesting that Cripps should be selected in the first place. I was suggesting that the position of small forward should be filled by Betts.That's fair but you wouldn't have Cripps as a small forward either. Dangerfield could at least play that role if required
And yep I'd absolutely have Dangerfield in the side over Selwood
That's a fair question.If you let Voss be in, then why not 8x AA brownlod medalist, Roo? Hird & Harvey probably should be salty as well if we're counting the 90's.
Back flankNo Luke Hodge?
I'd have him above Judd, Dangerfield, Scarlett, Riewoldt
Judd and Scarlett ??No Luke Hodge?
I'd have him above Judd, Dangerfield, Scarlett, Riewoldt
Selwood was a star and stood up in countless finals but some gloss/respect gets taken off him because of the ducking
3 of those AAs were outside the eligibility period, as was his only premiership.If you'd been AA 8 times, and AA captain twice, and a Brownlow winner, I'd have thought you'd be a Monty.
Roo very stiff I reckon.