I guess I'm looking at it from the perspective that he has kept to himself where as many others have their tin foil hats on.
But ultimately you are right on the medical advice front.
On SM-N981B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Opinion Non-Crows AFL 4: The Centre Cannot Hold
- Thread starter GROTTO
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
But ultimately you are right on the medical advice front.
On SM-N981B using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Oct 13, 2017
- 20,783
- 34,980
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Glenelg, tigers
So the AFL have finally shitcanned Carlolton from the first game of the season slot..
bout time.
bout time.
I wonder if he ever declined a supplement or did his own research on everything he had to take/injest during his career.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
Only for the year IMO.
Wouldn't have happened of Port and Brisbane made the GF, they'd still be playing Saturday
I am glad the AFL stepped away from allowing teams to dominate a specific prestigious fixtures. In no world whatsoever did Carlton or Richmond deserve to have ownership over the first game of the season. I like how they showed that with Anzac Day, allowing more teams into the day. Now I think they need to can the Collingwood v Melbourne Queens Birthday clash. The AFL needs to look at rotating all these prime days to allow all clubs an opportunity to build their brand amongst supporters.
Port would have to win a prelim for that.
- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
Indeed.
In all seriousness though, it's to give Victorian fans something after 2 years of nothing.
GROTTO
TheBrownDog
- Jul 5, 2013
- 68,475
- 94,100
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
- Thread starter
- #234
And if you need any more laughs for the night, here I have bookmarked and pinpointed the moment in time on Bigfooty, Dogs kick the first 4 and Sack Ken thread has lift off.Dont even mention Port making a GF in any hypothetical.
Before the prelim final. I was little worried.
Fortunately the Dogs put the game to bed inside 10 mins of that final. lol.
Its funny seeing us all unnecessarily panic. lol. Myself included.
Some Crows still had faith in Port. Ironic.
Your Welcome.
Only speaking the truth. Dont shoot the messenger. lol
Ban for spreading false and misleading information you reckon?
Don't forget flat earthers
Oh yes, how can we forget that old chestnut. I should tell people that I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll I feel I have to get that of my chest. It's time.
On SM-N981B using BigFooty.com mobile app
He is an idiot and that attitude is the height of arrogance. I would love to hear an umpire sit their for the Crows v Richmond grandfinal and justify each umpiring decision. Can't tell me the umpires didn't gift the game to Richmond.
On SM-N981B using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Sep 23, 2012
- 3,969
- 6,137
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, Ozark Mountain Daredevils
Players make decisions which impact on games, so do umpires - as simple as that
Punchy Bassett
Brownlow Medallist
What a crock
- Oct 16, 2011
- 16,702
- 43,376
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
The "r" is silent right?
Absolutely
I hate the argument that a single umpiring decision in the last 2 minutes of a game cost a club a win. Plenty of player mistakes, poor goal kicking etc cost far more games than umpires. But there are times in tight games that a series of poor umpiring decision can flatten a team. These type of decisions need to be discussed in the media because they are game changers and umpired should be held to account publicly just as much as players. On SM-N981B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Razor's premise is flawed. He is saying that because hundreds of individual actions occur in a footy match, a few dozen umpiring decisions make essentially no difference.
The thing is, those hundreds of individual actions are from two sides who are in opposition. If a goal is scored by both teams, that's two actions but it amounts of no change in the margin. If a chain of ten possessions results in a turnover followed by a chain of ten possessions by the other team, there have been twenty touches for essentially no change in the situation of the game. Most actions in a footy match just cancel out a previous action. A team generally wins when they are able to break through a handful of extra times. Thirty or forty umpiring decisions can have a massive impact on that.
You could apply the exact same "logic" to a soccer match. How many possessions? How many times choosing to leave your man, etc. But nobody would be stupid enough to argue that umpiring doesn't have an enormous impact on soccer.
The thing is, those hundreds of individual actions are from two sides who are in opposition. If a goal is scored by both teams, that's two actions but it amounts of no change in the margin. If a chain of ten possessions results in a turnover followed by a chain of ten possessions by the other team, there have been twenty touches for essentially no change in the situation of the game. Most actions in a footy match just cancel out a previous action. A team generally wins when they are able to break through a handful of extra times. Thirty or forty umpiring decisions can have a massive impact on that.
You could apply the exact same "logic" to a soccer match. How many possessions? How many times choosing to leave your man, etc. But nobody would be stupid enough to argue that umpiring doesn't have an enormous impact on soccer.
- Status
Similar threads
