Geezus this guy surely must now how have the record for most posts on a mediocre footballer.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Look, I'm not a huge fan of Acres but he was a 26 year old best 22 player on the wing. The absolute top in that position would be on 700k plus (think Whitfield, McCluggage) and the less known guys would be on around 400k. I seriously doubt any best 22 players that are 25-30 years old and play wing in the AFL are on less than 400k per year. If Brad Hill can command 900k per year then Acres should get 400.How does that argument stack up when you consider that he certainly wasn't in the best third of players the years prior to that one great year where our midfield were on top - and we would be paying him for 2023, requiring that performance in the future to be worth top third money.
I maintain that we could find a better use for that salary money.
If I only need to name sixteen players I'd pay more than Acres:
Cox, Pearce, Young, Ryan, Clark, Serong, Switkowski, Fyfe, Walters, Amiss, Schultz, Darcy, Brayshaw, Jackson, O'Meara, Frederick
That excludes Aish, Walker, O'Driscoll, Chapman, Treacy, Taberner, Erasmus and Johnson
And excludes Hughes, Banfield.
Very easy to see how Acres might not be so highly valued here. We don't get to have half our squad supplemented by "working" at the company owned by the billionaire board member family.
Geezus this guy surely must now how have the record for most posts on a mediocre footballer.
another one;
I would offer west coast McGovern , fisher and Jack Martin for the number 1 pick to start with
They need experienced players , not a newbie who won't hang around for more than 2 years.
just cooked
I think someone replied with something to this end.I’m positive that one is so bad others are shitting on it, like, that’s actually meme worthy that some numpty actually posted that
Not at Freo. Just because some players are overpaid doesn’t mean that Acres is worth $400k. He can command, which he did but he got it elsewhere. Same as Logue getting 700k at Norf (or whatever the figure is)Look, I'm not a huge fan of Acres but he was a 26 year old best 22 player on the wing. The absolute top in that position would be on 700k plus (think Whitfield, McCluggage) and the less known guys would be on around 400k. I seriously doubt any best 22 players that are 25-30 years old and play wing in the AFL are on less than 400k per year. If Brad Hill can command 900k per year then Acres should get 400.
Definitely not.Look, let's look at this a different way. The metric that was used is that the top 16 players at any club are on 400k and above.
Do you believe Blake Acres was in the best 16 players at Freo in 2022?
Hire a smart assistant coachCarlton are in a bit of a pickle:
1. Sack Vossy and be known as that club that sacks everyone - so not a very attractive proposition for any good coach to go.
2. Keep Vossy and persist with someone who, although a great guy, at this stage has not shown the tactical nous to be a good coach.
What do ya do?
I used to enjoy watching him purely for his good looks - even that value faded lolI still can’t understand how Acres is regarded as a big loss by many here. He played half a dozen good games for us in his 3 seasons. If it wasn’t for JLo he would probably be playing WAFL now. Call me old fashioned but his attitude stunk at the end of last season asking for a payrise.
Look, I'm not a huge fan of Acres but he was a 26 year old best 22 player on the wing. The absolute top in that position would be on 700k plus (think Whitfield, McCluggage) and the less known guys would be on around 400k. I seriously doubt any best 22 players that are 25-30 years old and play wing in the AFL are on less than 400k per year. If Brad Hill can command 900k per year then Acres should get 400.
It would have to raise to about 22 to be safeI heard he is suddenly a strong supporter of raising the draft age to 19.
If they are shrewd and slip in Sumich to the big chair, our Spudshed sponsorship could be under threat.another one;
I would offer west coast McGovern , fisher and Jack Martin for the number 1 pick to start with
They need experienced players , not a newbie who won't hang around for more than 2 years.
just cooked
If you are referring to Noddy, then he has just turned 21 and played 18 games of AFL footy. He’ll be making more than $400k by 26.I think there's a player lining up on our own side making under $400k to play wing.
I maintain that if you need a big body to run to the half back line/back pocket for an easy mark - hold up the ball and then bomb it long that you can find that in way more players for cheap - and it turned out I was right because that's the exact reason Carlton are losing, just like when it cost us too.
Acres wins the ball a lot because he is allowed to, it doesn't matter what club he is playing for.
What Whitfield and Hill have over Acres is that they break the lines. Acres lets the forwards (and their defenders) set up ahead of the ball and then kicks a long slow kick to them, heaven help you if you don't have dominant marking talls to maintain that field position or that ball is slingshot-ing back towards your defensive fifty really quick.
Acres needs to be used forward of centre, but his ball use isn't exactly elite either.
If it means peak Chris Judd and Wayne Carey for Travis Colyer I will reluctantly do that deal.The review threads are great but the Carlton board probably has the best rumour/list management thread (well they used to). Found this looking for goss and thought it was compelling:
---------------------------------------------------
Not sure how we get a RUCKMAN,
But Darcy has the gorilla type size we need.
If it means Darcy and Serong for cripps so be it.
---------------------------------------------------
Seems reasonable and balanced to me.
If you are referring to Noddy, then he has just turned 21 and played 18 games of AFL footy. He’ll be making more than $400k by 26.
I agree Acres strength is not fast transition of the footy but strangely enough thought his loopy kicks might not be so bad at Carlton (with Curnow and McKay).
The reason he's a loss is because we had no replacement, and that is at least part of the reason our season is shot.That’s kinda his problem, took him over two years to pull his finger out. Being on an AFL list beats being on a WAFL list and in my opinion that’s exactly where he was headed in his first two years with us.
Anyway, all that aside, I still don’t see him as a “big loss”.
I would bet you a bottle of Margaret River red that he’s getting 400k a year.No, I'm referring to James Aish
$14,000,000 for Bailey Banfield. The rest can fight over what's left.You've got $14,040,000 of salary cap to play with for 2023, take a stab at spending it.
The reason he's a loss is because we had no replacement, and that is at least part of the reason our season is shot.
Who cares about age?If you are referring to Noddy, then he has just turned 21 and played 18 games of AFL footy. He’ll be making more than $400k by 26.
I agree Acres strength is not fast transition of the footy but strangely enough thought his loopy kicks might not be so bad at Carlton (with Curnow and McKay).
It kind of is. It’s well known that the biggest contracts players get is when approaching free agency. (So that would be around 26). Also, every players salary is capped in their first 2 years. Historically, the odd really high draft pick (Boyd, Scully) will earn big bucks in their third year but most don’t.Who cares about age?
I would offer Noddy at 21 more than I would offer Acres at 26.
The AFL isn't some sort of closed shop where the perks go to those with seniority.