Official Shane Watson Thread

Is Watson good enough in One Dayers to warrant a spot?

  • No

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, White's a far better option

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but he must open and Hayden must be axed

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Remove this Banner Ad

Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

******** it, drop half the team.

This team should bring home the bacon

Tubby Taylor
Boonie's look alike from the Adelaide Oval
Richard Chee Quee
Shane Lee
Greg Blewett
Member from the fanatics

Get a grip people, we will win the WC, you read it here first.

You forgot Jo Angel.
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

He can bat, but can't bowl. Simple as that. Don't give him the ball.

Still, he contributes more than White does.
Does he?

I'd suggest if White was given the oppurtunities he's been given he'd have a far better career than Watson has to date.

Watson is a failure who has been given enough oppurtunities.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

He can bat, but can't bowl. Simple as that. Don't give him the ball.

Still, he contributes more than White does.
He aint good enough as a pure batter. Haddin is far better, Voges is better, Jaques is maybe better...
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....

Mechanoid%20Robot.jpg
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....

I know he's mates with Brett Lee, but don't act like a tosser just like Lee does
Difference is, Lee's a gun, Watson's is a dud.
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....

Difference is, Lee's a gun, Watson's is a dud.
and to be fair to Lee he rarely does it anymore, still does it but he's curbed it to a large extent.

but Watson?

every single ********ing time.

I'd love to see him get in the face of one of the big ********er Kiwi's away from a cricket pitch. They'd knock his ********ing block off.
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

I dont see why Tasmanians still defend Watson to the death when he abandoned them :confused:

That's presumably a shot at me, is it Edward?

Shame ... because, like just about everything else you say in your conversations with me, you can't seem to get anything right.

(a) I'm not a Tasmanian, mate; (b) this thread has nothing to do with anyone being defended to the death - if you looked closely, you'd see it's actually based on the opposite principle.

Bottom line and moral of the story: you're basically as clueless as ever. :eek:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....

Was Watson the one scared of the ghost or am I think of someone else?
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....

I admit I laughed when he was sledging Bell after Loye was run out off his bowling and England went on to win the game.
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....



He loves it

Must've had a big breakfast
 
Re: Watson's pathetic 'in your face' carry-on....



He loves it

Must've had a big breakfast
Was that when he got McMillian out for over 100?

Haha, what a goose.
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

Watson has his uses, but he is being mis-used.

If he's in the side, he needs to be in there as a M Clarke type role.

He isn't a 10 over bowler, he needs to be in there as a batsman who can bowl 3-5 to make up the fifth bowler.

But he isn't a fifth bowler by himself.

I wish we'd get over this stupid ********ing desire to play an all-rounder.

Either play 4 quicks or 3 quicks & hogg, and have Symonds/Clarke type players bowl the other ten.
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

He made 68, ran for Hayden the rest of the innings then had to bowl. Massive effort.

Running for Hayden from 100 onwards wasnt a hard task haha

Watson needs to stay in the side, as an opening batsman and in a combination of bowlers who make up the 10 overs. When Clarke and Symonds are back in the side, his bowling wont be too much of a concern, and his batting display today was just what was needed at the start of the innings. Dont judge his efforts when he is playing a bowling role that, really, he isnt up to yet
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

Watson has his uses, but he is being mis-used.

If he's in the side, he needs to be in there as a M Clarke type role.

He isn't a 10 over bowler, he needs to be in there as a batsman who can bowl 3-5 to make up the fifth bowler.

But he isn't a fifth bowler by himself.

I wish we'd get over this stupid ********ing desire to play an all-rounder.

Either play 4 quicks or 3 quicks & hogg, and have Symonds/Clarke type players bowl the other ten.

Haha, I should have read on before posting

Terrific points here :thumbsu:
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

That's presumably a shot at me, is it Edward?

Shame ... because, like just about everything else you say in your conversations with me, you can't seem to get anything right.

(a) I'm not a Tasmanian, mate; (b) this thread has nothing to do with anyone being defended to the death - if you looked closely, you'd see it's actually based on the opposite principle.

Bottom line and moral of the story: you're basically as clueless as ever. :eek:
Obviously got a big opinion of yourself if you think that is directed at you

All tasmanian supporters on here seem to love him
 
Re: Shane Watson - Please ********** him off!

Brendan Julian is in line for a recall the way Watson is performing.

Julian could hit a ball, and his bowling was more than handy!

The perfect all rounder to replace The Hack Shane Watson
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Official Shane Watson Thread

Back
Top