Official trade week thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

then i wont post....

j/k

im tipping there will be big names that havent been talked about getting traded. i doubt tigers will get brown or solomon. just crap all of it, just because there doing there trading thru the media ppl believe it. there giving up there details, while other clubs are doing it private.. no doubt bettering the deals the tigers have done. no cap room, just crap or untouchables will see them get not much at all. watch essendon rip ppl off once again. watch the swans try and off load players 27 to 29 years of age, varlton trying to trade anyone for big names, while clubs will just wait to they get delisted. any other views on the trading period ppl?
 
Here is what I believe we will get, without going overboard.

Gains:

Dean Solomon
Danny Jacobs
Ben Holland
Possibly a pick(s)

Losses:

Pick #5
Pick #20
Chris Lamb
Paul Wheatley


Pick #5 will go for Solomon and Jacobs. Pick #20 will probably go for Holland, but I could be wrong. I think Lamb and Wheatley are just about dead certs to be traded, either for mid range picks or as a sweetner.
 
Ok, here is what I realistically think we'll do..

IN: Stevens, Holland, Hulme, Jacobs, Wheatley



OUT: Pick5, Pick 20, Lamb, pick 52

Stevens for pick 5

holland for Lamb, pick 52

Hulme for Wheatley

Jacobs for pick 20

Although I do think we will also be VERY close to solomon, and if Michael becomes available, he'll overtake Jacobs..


Sounds too good to be true, but all these players, believe it or not, are possible, but to get all, say goodbye to White.
 
did u make an error buddy . YOu got wheatley going out and coming back in

Mate im a port fan and i think that port might want more than just pik 5, but u never know. If you get all that you will be doin very well...

Wishful thinking tho
 
Heard today that Port Adelaide wanted Daniel Bell and a pick (probably number 5) for Nick Stevens.

Danny Corcoran told them to **** off, and rightly so.
 
Originally posted by CowboyFromHell
Here is what I believe we will get, without going overboard.

Gains:

Dean Solomon
Danny Jacobs
Ben Holland
Possibly a pick(s)

Losses:

Pick #5
Pick #20
Chris Lamb
Paul Wheatley


Pick #5 will go for Solomon and Jacobs. Pick #20 will probably go for Holland, but I could be wrong. I think Lamb and Wheatley are just about dead certs to be traded, either for mid range picks or as a sweetner.

Pick #5 and Lamb for Jacobs and Solomon.
 
I think we will be able to do some good deals.

Michael for Pick 5

or

Stevens for Pick 5 + Pick 34

---

Jacobs for Pick 20

---

Holland for Pick 52 + Wheatley

---

Pick 34 (WB) for Lamb

---

If we want Stevens, then don't give Port a ridiculous offer like they are asking for. Give them 5 and 34 which is sufficient I believe. If we don't want him, then it will be a straight swap for Mal Michael (if he is available, which I doubt he will be). Otherwise, we will keep the pick.

Ben Holland will come with our 4th round pick plus Paul Wheatley, which is fair in my opinion. Pick 20 is too much, Pick 36 is taken and Pick 52 alone isn't enough. If they don't accept, and the Stevens deal falls through, we could still use Pick 34, which we would get from the Bulldogs in exchange for Lamb.

Danny Jacobs for Pick 20 alone would be fair in my opinion, and a win for both clubs. Essendon's first round pick comes at 13 I think, so this pick is only 7 spots lower. A fair deal there.

Now, there are 4/5 deals which are fair I believe, and should benefit all clubs involved. Of course, we won't be lucky enough to get all of them, but I'm hoping that at least 2 can arrive.
 
i think we should try to get solomon for pick 20 and a player (not crap like lamb or wheatley unless they are interested)

solomon for the above trade, holland for lamb, michael for pick 5

if we dont get michael for pick 5 then stevens for pick 5
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

just reported over hear in the west on Ch.10 that the eagles are making a big play for Stevie Armstrong - despite signing a new contract with u guys.
But u guys told us to come up with alot more.

Basically im asking what would u people consider reasonable from the eagles for Armstrong???

(positive suggestions- none of the "wont trade him" -cause it looks like u will if u get the right deal)
 
Originally posted by theorangeapple
just reported over hear in the west on Ch.10 that the eagles are making a big play for Stevie Armstrong - despite signing a new contract with u guys.
But u guys told us to come up with alot more.

Basically im asking what would u people consider reasonable from the eagles for Armstrong???

(positive suggestions- none of the "wont trade him" -cause it looks like u will if u get the right deal)
Sampi!

By the way, did they say on the News that he had signed with us?
 
Armstrong for Kerr.

That's about the amount you would need to land Steve Armstrong, plus he's stated numerous times he's VERY happy at the Dees.
 
Who would we want for Armstrong?
Well Eagles fans, look at your list, pick your best young talent that you can't afford to lose, that's him.
That's how we feel about arma.
 
Originally posted by chiliboy
Seriously though,

We'd take sampi, add in a 3rd rnder..

I wouldn't. Try Sampi and a 2nd rounder at least.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Official trade week thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top