I'm going for Fin as sub over AJ and Reef. Cox should ruck in the middle then spend a lot of time forward.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It depends how much versatility you have in the team. The sub rarely gets used as a direct replacement for the injured player's role.I see what you’re saying.
But this assumes the sub will be tactical.
You need more versatility in a sub than what Noble offers.
Injuries will happen.
No current season stats available
We'll see tomorrow and thur.Is Howe over his calf niggle and ready to play?
I think the sub will come from the 22 that started against Richmond. 2 will make way for Pendlebury and Howe with one getting dropped and the other the sub.I'm going to say Sullivan
Im with you on the extra runner, but think it's more likely to be one less defender - I don't think we can go back to Cox and Checkers and need an extra marking forward. AJ for me.Something tells me Gabelich will be on the money with Macrae the sub.
AJ didn’t do enough v Richmond and Reef probably blew his chance with that intraclub because it let AJ in ahead of him. Cox offers a better solution v Buckley/ Taylor than the other two and Macrae’s minutes v Richmond seemed to set him up for an early sub role (before injuries bite and he slides into the 22). Early season I prefer the extra ground level player as well for when fatigue hits late game.
FWIW if Howe misses Dean>Frampton with Noble remaining in the 23. I think Frampton has the edge from a depth chart perspective, but without both Murphy and Howe I feel more comfortable with Dean as the anchor.
I prefer the extra tall when the fatigue sets in.Something tells me Gabelich will be on the money with Macrae the sub.
AJ didn’t do enough v Richmond and Reef probably blew his chance with that intraclub because it let AJ in ahead of him. Cox offers a better solution v Buckley/ Taylor than the other two and Macrae’s minutes v Richmond seemed to set him up for an early sub role (before injuries bite and he slides into the 22). Early season I prefer the extra ground level player as well for when fatigue hits late game.
FWIW if Howe misses Dean>Frampton with Noble remaining in the 23. I think Frampton has the edge from a depth chart perspective, but without both Murphy and Howe I feel more comfortable with Dean as the anchor.
It’s how I’ve leant basically all pre-season so this is a late pivot for me and for the majority of the year I’d agree, but until the defensive systems start to take over post AD I’d rather we try to restrict scoring with the extra defender.Im with you on the extra runner, but think it's more likely to be one less defender - I don't think we can go back to Cox and Checkers and need an extra marking forward. AJ for me.
I’m getting a little lost in the permutations, but I think that then becomes a Dean v Noble discussion with Macrae missing. Given what we’ve previously seen of Frampton in the middle that would be my preference over him down back even with Howe as the “sweeper”.I prefer the extra tall when the fatigue sets in.
Tired players make less leads and start bombing it long more often. It also means less rest for our taller players so they’ll struggle to get to those contests. Buckley and Taylor will eat that up against smaller players.
If the club thinks Cox is the best option forward against Taylor and Buckley then I’d prefer Frampton be our second ruck and Dean in defence.
This is a possibility.I'm going for Fin as sub over AJ and Reef. Cox should ruck in the middle then spend a lot of time forward.
I think that leaves us exposed. If you went on TOG figures from last season it would mean 70% of the game we would have one of Brody, Cameron or Cox as the only tall on the forward line. To ask them, as older players , to bump up their time TOG doesnt sound like a solution. AJ is a need to start for me.Reckon the AFL.com have it right with Cox or Cameron alternating at FF
I’m pulling for Reef but he and AJ haven’t demanded the position
I prefer Dean but Frampton allows Moore to play to his strengths and matches up with Hogan.
Lachie Schultz fits us like a glove
The real question is the sub. Lipinski cemented his spot. WHE can play fwd,wing or def - the perfect sub(like Frampton), but has had an excellent preseason. Just pushes Finn out to Sub
I'm going for Fin as sub over AJ and Reef. Cox should ruck in the middle then spend a lot of time forward.
That's my feeling as well.AJ plays 100%
You need another out if you want to include Noble as the subFrom flag.
Out ginnivan Murphy
In Schultz Dean
Sub Noble
Agree on AJ and Reef. Until they give the impression they are demanding an AFL position, they can spend their time swanning around the VFL forward line. Frampton also gives us the option of using him in the ruck to allow Cox to play forward. I don't mind Frampton playing ruck.Reckon the AFL.com have it right with Cox or Cameron alternating at FF
I’m pulling for Reef but he and AJ haven’t demanded the position
I prefer Dean but Frampton allows Moore to play to his strengths and matches up with Hogan.
Lachie Schultz fits us like a glove
The real question is the sub. Lipinski cemented his spot. WHE can play fwd,wing or def - the perfect sub(like Frampton), but has had an excellent preseason. Just pushes Finn out to Sub
Swanning around should be a glorious phrase at our club. I want most of our players Swanning around.Agree on AJ and Reef. Until they give the impression they are demanding an AFL position, they can spend their time swanning around the VFL forward line. Frampton also gives us the option of using him in the ruck to allow Cox to play forward. I don't mind Frampton playing ruck.