No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXV

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Essendon responds to fans who want to cancel memberships​

Essendon has responded to outraged supporters who threatened to tear up their memberships on the back of Andrew Thorburn’s appointment as chief executive.
Thorburn was appointed on Monday but resigned on Tuesday in the wake of the Herald Sun’s revelations that he was also chairman of a church which had likened abortion to the Holocaust.

“The person who holds a CEO position must reflect the values of the organisation that they lead and represent and throughout the course of (Tuesday) it became apparent that this was not the case for Andrew,” Essendon’s membership department wrote in an email to fans.

Andrew Thorburn at The Hangar, Essendon Football club

Andrew Thorburn at The Hangar, Essendon Football club

“There was a clear conflict in values from being a director of the church that do not align with being the leader of the Essendon Football Club. We understand and respect each individual's decision to commit as a member … and will continue to move forward as a united club.

“In light of this, can you please confirm if you would still like me to complete the cancellation of your 2023 membership?”

The Bombers’ relationship with Ernst and Young, the consultancy firm which is also completing the club’s external review, became strained after it failed to uncover the red flag before Thorburn’s appointment.

President David Barham said the club first learnt of Thorburn’s connections to City on a Hill — and that offensive sermon from 2013 — after it was reported in the Herald Sun.

The church has since deleted the concentration camp comparison from its online sermon.

City on a Hill pastor and founder Guy Mason said: “The words were wrong. I would use different words today”.

 
1665196603973.png

When Kevin Sheedy and his wife Geraldine boarded Lindsay Fox’s luxury boat in New York to celebrate the ol’ trucker’s 85th birthday last month, the Essendon coaching legend was in a festive mood.

Like everyone, he’d been looking forward to getting overseas again. But most of all he was content that the football club he loved was finally about to get its own ship in order.

Sheedy knew there was one final piece to the puzzle which required his touch and that would be taken care of when he finished mingling with 400 of Australia’s most rich and famous on the extravagant getaway.

Sheedy had the belief that he and the new president David Barham — a go-getter type for sure — would have the final say on who be the new coach of Essendon.

A six-member panel had been formed, which interestingly included his former arch enemy Robert Walls, to canvas a number of candidates, but in the end it would be Sheedy and Barham to make the ultimate call.

Or so he’d thought.

‘IT’S SO POLITICAL, IT’S UNBELIEVABLE’: HOW DONS GOT HERE

FOOTBALL clubs are unique but what they most resemble is a political party.

Factions dictate direction and at Essendon, it has long been the case where too much influence has been given to former legends or supporters with deep pockets and big mouths.

This year, and not for the first time, the Old Guard v the New Guard has faced off.

“It’s so political, it’s unbelievable,” said one former staff member, who’d come from another AFL club, of the goings on at the club’s Tullamarine headquarters.

“People have got to stop playing politics at that football club and actually just think about what they’re doing.”

The Essendonians is proudly the oldest coterie group in the AFL. They wield considerable power — or so they say — given they can alter the amount of money they donate to the club depending on how they view its operations.

So, if they don’t like someone or something (ie former coach Matthew Knights) then the administrators soon fall into line (ie hiring of James Hird).

The behind-the-scenes politics is at the heart of the latest mess.

Who would’ve thought the Bombers would find themselves in such a laugh-a-minute schmozzle so soon after the gut-wrenching and soul-destroying supplements scandal?

While understandably that horrible chapter in the club’s history has taken its toll, and probably still does, the botched number of resets in recent years is what continues to outrage the faithful.

The latest had its origin back to midway through the season – the Bombers won just two games from the opening 11 matches – when several powerbrokers, including Sheedy, concluded that Ben Rutten wasn’t the answer as senior coach.

Despite having got the Bombers into the finals in his first full season in the job following the departure of John Worsfold, the lack of a solid game plan and the disturbing regression by a number of players had Rutten clearly under pressure.

Even then, Sheedy had an inkling for Hird.

The season swayed under the umbrella of a micky-mouse internal review, until the result of that review — namely to keep Rutten — produced a good old fashioned boardroom showdown.

In the pro Rutten camp were longstanding CEO Xavier Campbell and president Paul Brasher who’d also only been in the job for a year.

Across the table was Barham, who would ultimately take over the Essendon presidency after getting Sheedy’s backing.

In many respects, Barham was only president because of Sheedy. And Sheedy wanted Hird as coach. And Barham knew Sheedy wanted Hird as coach.

When the Bombers produced one of their worst performances of the season in round 22 at Marvel Stadium against Port Adelaide, losing by 84 points, Rutten was officially done.

Barham then made his move on Brasher, who in May had instigated the internal review of the underperforming football department. It was a quick kill. Brasher was forced into handing in his resignation as president the following day.

An external review into the entire operations of the club was launched immediately with former NAB boss and big-time Essendon fan Andrew Thorburn brought in to run it.

At the same time, Barham made his dash at coaching great Alastair Clarkson. His Hail Mary approach was too late and too unprofessional. And Clarkson agreed days later to join North Melbourne.

All the time, Rutten remained as the head coach.

It was humiliating for Rutten and unbecoming of a football club which, at its helm, had a man scrambling around like the Tassie Tiger cartoon character.

Barham kept Rutten hanging all week, forcing him to coach the final game of the season before knifing him the next day.

“You look at the way they treated Truck (Rutten), regardless if he can coach or not, you don’t treat people like that,” one former Essendon great said.

“If the president does that then anybody else at the club thinks they can do the same thing and get away with it. There’s your culture problem.”

Three days later, Campbell, who by this stage was barely communicating with Barham, fell on his sword. Then favourite son Simon Madden stepped down from the board and two other board members, Peter Allen and football director Sean Wellman, also signalled they would depart in the coming months.

It was brutal and badly handled.

The media giant Barham fumbled his first press conference, declaring the Bombers were after an experienced coach. It required football boss Josh Mahoney, who was leading the search for the new coach, to clarify Barham’s wishes days later when it became clear there weren’t any big fish desperate to get to Essendon.

One big fish who was becoming increasingly interested was Hird.

While his first stint in the top job at Essendon had ended horribly, and almost with his life, the club legend had put himself back into the football world as a part-time assistant helping his former teammate Mark McVeigh at the Giants.

Simply, he’d caught the bug again.

And Sheedy was quickly in his court, believing his premiership captain was exactly the man to pull his old club together again.

Hird believed it, too.

Further, it’s understood Hird and Barham had spoken several weeks previously and that Hird was assured he would be legitimately considered for the job.

No promises from Barham, but an assurance that he and Sheedy would be picking the coach.

So, Hird went for an interview.

And Sheedy went to New York.

The cunning old bugger’s plan was in train.

Already, whatever hope Barham had of landing Clarkson was scuppered when Sheedy suggested in a radio interview that Clarkson would be better suited at the Kangaroos.

In Sheedy’s mind, everything was in order.

HOW THE LAY OF THE LAND CHANGED AT ESSENDON

WHAT happened in the 12 days Sheedy was at sea is a mystery.

When he disembarked in Montreal, the lay of the land at Essendon had changed dramatically.

Four candidates had been interviewed by the Bombers panel which included Walls, Hawthorn premiership star Jordan Lewis, netball legend Simone McKinnins, football manager Josh Mahoney, board member Dorothy Hisgrove and consultant Thorburn.

Hird had reportedly impressed but he never heard back from the panel.

His former teammate Dean Solomon and St Kilda assistant Brendon Lade also only had one interview, while Melbourne assistant Adem Yze, who’d just missed out on the GWS job, received a second interview.

He was now the favourite.

And Hird? Media folk were emphatically declaring he had no chance — was there a leak from Essendon? — which left Hird pondering if he had been lied to.

As Grand Final week kicked in, and while Sheedy was still overseas, Barham’s focus shifted to former North Melbourne coach Brad Scott.

Scott had refused to say if he was officially interested in the role because, as the AFL’s football operations manager, he believed it wasn’t appropriate to be a candidate until the season had been completed.

After watching his twin Chris win another premiership with Geelong, Scott put his hand up to be interviewed the following Thursday, and then he met the Essendon board which included Sheedy via Zoom.

The so-called plan of Barham and Sheedy selecting the coach, presumably after considering recommendations from the selection panel, was ditched, which blindsided Sheedy.

There was no vote between Scott and Hird and even Yze per se.

Instead, after just the one interview, Scott was the nomination and he was voted in as the new coach. Not unanimously mind you.

Sheedy, who was in California, was shocked and disappointed.

He called the Herald Sun, wanting the world to know he voted for Hird.

He was widely condemned for “breaking ranks’’, but such is the cost of loyalty.

For sure, the bond between a captain and his coach in the AFL is special, far beyond any player-coach relationship.

Think Chris Scott and Joel Selwood, Damien Hardwick and Trent Cotchin, Leigh Matthews and Michael Voss. There is a trust, respect and appreciation which is there for life.

A true example came with Luke Hodge’s statement in support of Clarkson at the height of the Hawthorn scandal. He wanted his ex-coach to know that he was in his corner.

That’s exactly what Sheedy felt when he publicly declared he’d voted for Hird. He didn’t want anyone to think he’d turned his back on his captain.

It blazed headlines on the very day Scott was at his first press conference.

If the footy world thought the Sheedy bomb was a PR disaster, the appointment of Thorburn as CEO made the club a national embarrassment.

It was announced just hours before Monday night’s Crichton Medal count, which allowed Thorburn to address the assembled players and supporters.

Twenty hours later he was gone.

Barham’s “comprehensive” process to appoint Thorburn failed to look into his links with church organisation, City on a Hill, whose website revealed its offensive views on abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

His resignation after Essendon asked him to choose between the church and the football club ignited a political debate which has gone around the country and is still raging today.

Indeed, the process of appointing Thorburn to the role had put some staff at the football club off-side.

He’d been in charge of the external review and as part of that review, he had spoken to dozens of staff, urging them to tell him everything as he was an impartial observer.

Thorburn also interviewed candidates for the vacant CEO job, canvassing their IP, before deciding he would put his hand up for the gig.

Talk about a conflict of interest.

Still, Barham gave him the job.

“That was never going to be a safe environment for the employees,” one club insider said.

“He ran the review, the staff were honest with him, he was saying, ‘I’m impartial, tell me all your secrets’. Then suddenly it was like, ‘Oh by the way now all those things you said, I remember them and I’m now your CEO’.”

The man left standing is Barham who has conceded there has been some missteps along the way.

How Barham survives this mess is now a matter of great discussion and among those powerful coterie groups, there will be a group of people who think they can do better.

For sure, a board challenge is not out of the question.

Sheedy, meanwhile, will support Scott to the hilt.

And Hird? He probably thinks he was strung along, and if that is the truth, he will never have anything to do with the Essendon Football Club again.

 
THE THIN MAN said:
View attachment 1530080

When Kevin Sheedy and his wife Geraldine boarded Lindsay Fox’s luxury boat in New York to celebrate the ol’ trucker’s 85th birthday last month, the Essendon coaching legend was in a festive mood.

Like everyone, he’d been looking forward to getting overseas again. But most of all he was content that the football club he loved was finally about to get its own ship in order.

Sheedy knew there was one final piece to the puzzle which required his touch and that would be taken care of when he finished mingling with 400 of Australia’s most rich and famous on the extravagant getaway.

Sheedy had the belief that he and the new president David Barham — a go-getter type for sure — would have the final say on who be the new coach of Essendon.

A six-member panel had been formed, which interestingly included his former arch enemy Robert Walls, to canvas a number of candidates, but in the end it would be Sheedy and Barham to make the ultimate call.

Or so he’d thought.

‘IT’S SO POLITICAL, IT’S UNBELIEVABLE’: HOW DONS GOT HERE

FOOTBALL clubs are unique but what they most resemble is a political party.

Factions dictate direction and at Essendon, it has long been the case where too much influence has been given to former legends or supporters with deep pockets and big mouths.

This year, and not for the first time, the Old Guard v the New Guard has faced off.

“It’s so political, it’s unbelievable,” said one former staff member, who’d come from another AFL club, of the goings on at the club’s Tullamarine headquarters.

“People have got to stop playing politics at that football club and actually just think about what they’re doing.”

The Essendonians is proudly the oldest coterie group in the AFL. They wield considerable power — or so they say — given they can alter the amount of money they donate to the club depending on how they view its operations.

So, if they don’t like someone or something (ie former coach Matthew Knights) then the administrators soon fall into line (ie hiring of James Hird).

The behind-the-scenes politics is at the heart of the latest mess.

Who would’ve thought the Bombers would find themselves in such a laugh-a-minute schmozzle so soon after the gut-wrenching and soul-destroying supplements scandal?

While understandably that horrible chapter in the club’s history has taken its toll, and probably still does, the botched number of resets in recent years is what continues to outrage the faithful.

The latest had its origin back to midway through the season – the Bombers won just two games from the opening 11 matches – when several powerbrokers, including Sheedy, concluded that Ben Rutten wasn’t the answer as senior coach.

Despite having got the Bombers into the finals in his first full season in the job following the departure of John Worsfold, the lack of a solid game plan and the disturbing regression by a number of players had Rutten clearly under pressure.

Even then, Sheedy had an inkling for Hird.

The season swayed under the umbrella of a micky-mouse internal review, until the result of that review — namely to keep Rutten — produced a good old fashioned boardroom showdown.

In the pro Rutten camp were longstanding CEO Xavier Campbell and president Paul Brasher who’d also only been in the job for a year.

Across the table was Barham, who would ultimately take over the Essendon presidency after getting Sheedy’s backing.

In many respects, Barham was only president because of Sheedy. And Sheedy wanted Hird as coach. And Barham knew Sheedy wanted Hird as coach.

When the Bombers produced one of their worst performances of the season in round 22 at Marvel Stadium against Port Adelaide, losing by 84 points, Rutten was officially done.

Barham then made his move on Brasher, who in May had instigated the internal review of the underperforming football department. It was a quick kill. Brasher was forced into handing in his resignation as president the following day.

An external review into the entire operations of the club was launched immediately with former NAB boss and big-time Essendon fan Andrew Thorburn brought in to run it.

At the same time, Barham made his dash at coaching great Alastair Clarkson. His Hail Mary approach was too late and too unprofessional. And Clarkson agreed days later to join North Melbourne.

All the time, Rutten remained as the head coach.

It was humiliating for Rutten and unbecoming of a football club which, at its helm, had a man scrambling around like the Tassie Tiger cartoon character.

Barham kept Rutten hanging all week, forcing him to coach the final game of the season before knifing him the next day.

“You look at the way they treated Truck (Rutten), regardless if he can coach or not, you don’t treat people like that,” one former Essendon great said.

“If the president does that then anybody else at the club thinks they can do the same thing and get away with it. There’s your culture problem.”

Three days later, Campbell, who by this stage was barely communicating with Barham, fell on his sword. Then favourite son Simon Madden stepped down from the board and two other board members, Peter Allen and football director Sean Wellman, also signalled they would depart in the coming months.

It was brutal and badly handled.

The media giant Barham fumbled his first press conference, declaring the Bombers were after an experienced coach. It required football boss Josh Mahoney, who was leading the search for the new coach, to clarify Barham’s wishes days later when it became clear there weren’t any big fish desperate to get to Essendon.

One big fish who was becoming increasingly interested was Hird.

While his first stint in the top job at Essendon had ended horribly, and almost with his life, the club legend had put himself back into the football world as a part-time assistant helping his former teammate Mark McVeigh at the Giants.

Simply, he’d caught the bug again.

And Sheedy was quickly in his court, believing his premiership captain was exactly the man to pull his old club together again.

Hird believed it, too.

Further, it’s understood Hird and Barham had spoken several weeks previously and that Hird was assured he would be legitimately considered for the job.

No promises from Barham, but an assurance that he and Sheedy would be picking the coach.

So, Hird went for an interview.

And Sheedy went to New York.

The cunning old bugger’s plan was in train.

Already, whatever hope Barham had of landing Clarkson was scuppered when Sheedy suggested in a radio interview that Clarkson would be better suited at the Kangaroos.

In Sheedy’s mind, everything was in order.

HOW THE LAY OF THE LAND CHANGED AT ESSENDON

WHAT happened in the 12 days Sheedy was at sea is a mystery.

When he disembarked in Montreal, the lay of the land at Essendon had changed dramatically.

Four candidates had been interviewed by the Bombers panel which included Walls, Hawthorn premiership star Jordan Lewis, netball legend Simone McKinnins, football manager Josh Mahoney, board member Dorothy Hisgrove and consultant Thorburn.

Hird had reportedly impressed but he never heard back from the panel.

His former teammate Dean Solomon and St Kilda assistant Brendon Lade also only had one interview, while Melbourne assistant Adem Yze, who’d just missed out on the GWS job, received a second interview.

He was now the favourite.

And Hird? Media folk were emphatically declaring he had no chance — was there a leak from Essendon? — which left Hird pondering if he had been lied to.

As Grand Final week kicked in, and while Sheedy was still overseas, Barham’s focus shifted to former North Melbourne coach Brad Scott.

Scott had refused to say if he was officially interested in the role because, as the AFL’s football operations manager, he believed it wasn’t appropriate to be a candidate until the season had been completed.

After watching his twin Chris win another premiership with Geelong, Scott put his hand up to be interviewed the following Thursday, and then he met the Essendon board which included Sheedy via Zoom.

The so-called plan of Barham and Sheedy selecting the coach, presumably after considering recommendations from the selection panel, was ditched, which blindsided Sheedy.

There was no vote between Scott and Hird and even Yze per se.

Instead, after just the one interview, Scott was the nomination and he was voted in as the new coach. Not unanimously mind you.

Sheedy, who was in California, was shocked and disappointed.

He called the Herald Sun, wanting the world to know he voted for Hird.

He was widely condemned for “breaking ranks’’, but such is the cost of loyalty.

For sure, the bond between a captain and his coach in the AFL is special, far beyond any player-coach relationship.

Think Chris Scott and Joel Selwood, Damien Hardwick and Trent Cotchin, Leigh Matthews and Michael Voss. There is a trust, respect and appreciation which is there for life.

A true example came with Luke Hodge’s statement in support of Clarkson at the height of the Hawthorn scandal. He wanted his ex-coach to know that he was in his corner.

That’s exactly what Sheedy felt when he publicly declared he’d voted for Hird. He didn’t want anyone to think he’d turned his back on his captain.

It blazed headlines on the very day Scott was at his first press conference.

If the footy world thought the Sheedy bomb was a PR disaster, the appointment of Thorburn as CEO made the club a national embarrassment.

It was announced just hours before Monday night’s Crichton Medal count, which allowed Thorburn to address the assembled players and supporters.

Twenty hours later he was gone.

Barham’s “comprehensive” process to appoint Thorburn failed to look into his links with church organisation, City on a Hill, whose website revealed its offensive views on abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

His resignation after Essendon asked him to choose between the church and the football club ignited a political debate which has gone around the country and is still raging today.

Indeed, the process of appointing Thorburn to the role had put some staff at the football club off-side.

He’d been in charge of the external review and as part of that review, he had spoken to dozens of staff, urging them to tell him everything as he was an impartial observer.

Thorburn also interviewed candidates for the vacant CEO job, canvassing their IP, before deciding he would put his hand up for the gig.

Talk about a conflict of interest.

Still, Barham gave him the job.

“That was never going to be a safe environment for the employees,” one club insider said.

“He ran the review, the staff were honest with him, he was saying, ‘I’m impartial, tell me all your secrets’. Then suddenly it was like, ‘Oh by the way now all those things you said, I remember them and I’m now your CEO’.”

The man left standing is Barham who has conceded there has been some missteps along the way.

How Barham survives this mess is now a matter of great discussion and among those powerful coterie groups, there will be a group of people who think they can do better.

For sure, a board challenge is not out of the question.

Sheedy, meanwhile, will support Scott to the hilt.

And Hird? He probably thinks he was strung along, and if that is the truth, he will never have anything to do with the Essendon Football Club again.

Click to expand...
have the distinct feeling little is lining up the troops. how any club could have picked thorburn after the n.a.b disaster is beyond me. there's a reason for him being in the c.e.o wilderness 4 years.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

THE THIN MAN said:

Essendon responds to fans who want to cancel memberships​

Essendon has responded to outraged supporters who threatened to tear up their memberships on the back of Andrew Thorburn’s appointment as chief executive.
Thorburn was appointed on Monday but resigned on Tuesday in the wake of the Herald Sun’s revelations that he was also chairman of a church which had likened abortion to the Holocaust.

“The person who holds a CEO position must reflect the values of the organisation that they lead and represent and throughout the course of (Tuesday) it became apparent that this was not the case for Andrew,” Essendon’s membership department wrote in an email to fans.

Andrew Thorburn at The Hangar, Essendon Football club

Andrew Thorburn at The Hangar, Essendon Football club

“There was a clear conflict in values from being a director of the church that do not align with being the leader of the Essendon Football Club. We understand and respect each individual's decision to commit as a member … and will continue to move forward as a united club.

“In light of this, can you please confirm if you would still like me to complete the cancellation of your 2023 membership?”

The Bombers’ relationship with Ernst and Young, the consultancy firm which is also completing the club’s external review, became strained after it failed to uncover the red flag before Thorburn’s appointment.

President David Barham said the club first learnt of Thorburn’s connections to City on a Hill — and that offensive sermon from 2013 — after it was reported in the Herald Sun.

The church has since deleted the concentration camp comparison from its online sermon.

City on a Hill pastor and founder Guy Mason said: “The words were wrong. I would use different words today”.

Click to expand...

I enjoy how Sheedy and Hird have their own personal propaganda department within the Murdoch media.
 
THE THIN MAN said:
View attachment 1530080

When Kevin Sheedy and his wife Geraldine boarded Lindsay Fox’s luxury boat in New York to celebrate the ol’ trucker’s 85th birthday last month, the Essendon coaching legend was in a festive mood.

Like everyone, he’d been looking forward to getting overseas again. But most of all he was content that the football club he loved was finally about to get its own ship in order.

Sheedy knew there was one final piece to the puzzle which required his touch and that would be taken care of when he finished mingling with 400 of Australia’s most rich and famous on the extravagant getaway.

Sheedy had the belief that he and the new president David Barham — a go-getter type for sure — would have the final say on who be the new coach of Essendon.

A six-member panel had been formed, which interestingly included his former arch enemy Robert Walls, to canvas a number of candidates, but in the end it would be Sheedy and Barham to make the ultimate call.

Or so he’d thought.

‘IT’S SO POLITICAL, IT’S UNBELIEVABLE’: HOW DONS GOT HERE

FOOTBALL clubs are unique but what they most resemble is a political party.

Factions dictate direction and at Essendon, it has long been the case where too much influence has been given to former legends or supporters with deep pockets and big mouths.

This year, and not for the first time, the Old Guard v the New Guard has faced off.

“It’s so political, it’s unbelievable,” said one former staff member, who’d come from another AFL club, of the goings on at the club’s Tullamarine headquarters.

“People have got to stop playing politics at that football club and actually just think about what they’re doing.”

The Essendonians is proudly the oldest coterie group in the AFL. They wield considerable power — or so they say — given they can alter the amount of money they donate to the club depending on how they view its operations.

So, if they don’t like someone or something (ie former coach Matthew Knights) then the administrators soon fall into line (ie hiring of James Hird).

The behind-the-scenes politics is at the heart of the latest mess.

Who would’ve thought the Bombers would find themselves in such a laugh-a-minute schmozzle so soon after the gut-wrenching and soul-destroying supplements scandal?

While understandably that horrible chapter in the club’s history has taken its toll, and probably still does, the botched number of resets in recent years is what continues to outrage the faithful.

The latest had its origin back to midway through the season – the Bombers won just two games from the opening 11 matches – when several powerbrokers, including Sheedy, concluded that Ben Rutten wasn’t the answer as senior coach.

Despite having got the Bombers into the finals in his first full season in the job following the departure of John Worsfold, the lack of a solid game plan and the disturbing regression by a number of players had Rutten clearly under pressure.

Even then, Sheedy had an inkling for Hird.

The season swayed under the umbrella of a micky-mouse internal review, until the result of that review — namely to keep Rutten — produced a good old fashioned boardroom showdown.

In the pro Rutten camp were longstanding CEO Xavier Campbell and president Paul Brasher who’d also only been in the job for a year.

Across the table was Barham, who would ultimately take over the Essendon presidency after getting Sheedy’s backing.

In many respects, Barham was only president because of Sheedy. And Sheedy wanted Hird as coach. And Barham knew Sheedy wanted Hird as coach.

When the Bombers produced one of their worst performances of the season in round 22 at Marvel Stadium against Port Adelaide, losing by 84 points, Rutten was officially done.

Barham then made his move on Brasher, who in May had instigated the internal review of the underperforming football department. It was a quick kill. Brasher was forced into handing in his resignation as president the following day.

An external review into the entire operations of the club was launched immediately with former NAB boss and big-time Essendon fan Andrew Thorburn brought in to run it.

At the same time, Barham made his dash at coaching great Alastair Clarkson. His Hail Mary approach was too late and too unprofessional. And Clarkson agreed days later to join North Melbourne.

All the time, Rutten remained as the head coach.

It was humiliating for Rutten and unbecoming of a football club which, at its helm, had a man scrambling around like the Tassie Tiger cartoon character.

Barham kept Rutten hanging all week, forcing him to coach the final game of the season before knifing him the next day.

“You look at the way they treated Truck (Rutten), regardless if he can coach or not, you don’t treat people like that,” one former Essendon great said.

“If the president does that then anybody else at the club thinks they can do the same thing and get away with it. There’s your culture problem.”

Three days later, Campbell, who by this stage was barely communicating with Barham, fell on his sword. Then favourite son Simon Madden stepped down from the board and two other board members, Peter Allen and football director Sean Wellman, also signalled they would depart in the coming months.

It was brutal and badly handled.

The media giant Barham fumbled his first press conference, declaring the Bombers were after an experienced coach. It required football boss Josh Mahoney, who was leading the search for the new coach, to clarify Barham’s wishes days later when it became clear there weren’t any big fish desperate to get to Essendon.

One big fish who was becoming increasingly interested was Hird.

While his first stint in the top job at Essendon had ended horribly, and almost with his life, the club legend had put himself back into the football world as a part-time assistant helping his former teammate Mark McVeigh at the Giants.

Simply, he’d caught the bug again.

And Sheedy was quickly in his court, believing his premiership captain was exactly the man to pull his old club together again.

Hird believed it, too.

Further, it’s understood Hird and Barham had spoken several weeks previously and that Hird was assured he would be legitimately considered for the job.

No promises from Barham, but an assurance that he and Sheedy would be picking the coach.

So, Hird went for an interview.

And Sheedy went to New York.

The cunning old bugger’s plan was in train.

Already, whatever hope Barham had of landing Clarkson was scuppered when Sheedy suggested in a radio interview that Clarkson would be better suited at the Kangaroos.

In Sheedy’s mind, everything was in order.

HOW THE LAY OF THE LAND CHANGED AT ESSENDON

WHAT happened in the 12 days Sheedy was at sea is a mystery.

When he disembarked in Montreal, the lay of the land at Essendon had changed dramatically.

Four candidates had been interviewed by the Bombers panel which included Walls, Hawthorn premiership star Jordan Lewis, netball legend Simone McKinnins, football manager Josh Mahoney, board member Dorothy Hisgrove and consultant Thorburn.

Hird had reportedly impressed but he never heard back from the panel.

His former teammate Dean Solomon and St Kilda assistant Brendon Lade also only had one interview, while Melbourne assistant Adem Yze, who’d just missed out on the GWS job, received a second interview.

He was now the favourite.

And Hird? Media folk were emphatically declaring he had no chance — was there a leak from Essendon? — which left Hird pondering if he had been lied to.

As Grand Final week kicked in, and while Sheedy was still overseas, Barham’s focus shifted to former North Melbourne coach Brad Scott.

Scott had refused to say if he was officially interested in the role because, as the AFL’s football operations manager, he believed it wasn’t appropriate to be a candidate until the season had been completed.

After watching his twin Chris win another premiership with Geelong, Scott put his hand up to be interviewed the following Thursday, and then he met the Essendon board which included Sheedy via Zoom.

The so-called plan of Barham and Sheedy selecting the coach, presumably after considering recommendations from the selection panel, was ditched, which blindsided Sheedy.

There was no vote between Scott and Hird and even Yze per se.

Instead, after just the one interview, Scott was the nomination and he was voted in as the new coach. Not unanimously mind you.

Sheedy, who was in California, was shocked and disappointed.

He called the Herald Sun, wanting the world to know he voted for Hird.

He was widely condemned for “breaking ranks’’, but such is the cost of loyalty.

For sure, the bond between a captain and his coach in the AFL is special, far beyond any player-coach relationship.

Think Chris Scott and Joel Selwood, Damien Hardwick and Trent Cotchin, Leigh Matthews and Michael Voss. There is a trust, respect and appreciation which is there for life.

A true example came with Luke Hodge’s statement in support of Clarkson at the height of the Hawthorn scandal. He wanted his ex-coach to know that he was in his corner.

That’s exactly what Sheedy felt when he publicly declared he’d voted for Hird. He didn’t want anyone to think he’d turned his back on his captain.

It blazed headlines on the very day Scott was at his first press conference.

If the footy world thought the Sheedy bomb was a PR disaster, the appointment of Thorburn as CEO made the club a national embarrassment.

It was announced just hours before Monday night’s Crichton Medal count, which allowed Thorburn to address the assembled players and supporters.

Twenty hours later he was gone.

Barham’s “comprehensive” process to appoint Thorburn failed to look into his links with church organisation, City on a Hill, whose website revealed its offensive views on abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

His resignation after Essendon asked him to choose between the church and the football club ignited a political debate which has gone around the country and is still raging today.

Indeed, the process of appointing Thorburn to the role had put some staff at the football club off-side.

He’d been in charge of the external review and as part of that review, he had spoken to dozens of staff, urging them to tell him everything as he was an impartial observer.

Thorburn also interviewed candidates for the vacant CEO job, canvassing their IP, before deciding he would put his hand up for the gig.

Talk about a conflict of interest.

Still, Barham gave him the job.

“That was never going to be a safe environment for the employees,” one club insider said.

“He ran the review, the staff were honest with him, he was saying, ‘I’m impartial, tell me all your secrets’. Then suddenly it was like, ‘Oh by the way now all those things you said, I remember them and I’m now your CEO’.”

The man left standing is Barham who has conceded there has been some missteps along the way.

How Barham survives this mess is now a matter of great discussion and among those powerful coterie groups, there will be a group of people who think they can do better.

For sure, a board challenge is not out of the question.

Sheedy, meanwhile, will support Scott to the hilt.

And Hird? He probably thinks he was strung along, and if that is the truth, he will never have anything to do with the Essendon Football Club again.

Click to expand...

giphy_2_79.gif
 
“FOOTBALL clubs are unique but what they most resemble is a political party.”

Absolute crap.
One football club is, that’s for sure. I’m yet to see any evidence suggesting that generalisation has any foundation.

Robbo the fanboy trying to dilute how toxic Essendon is by saying they’re all like that. Crap.

That Sheedy can walk in and assume pseudo control is just a disgrace. I’ve said before, once a long time ago he was a good footy coach. Now he’s an old man with no ability to RUN a football club and they’re letting him do it. Thankfully someone finally had the nuts to vote him down…but they’ve got to get rid of him and run the club professionally.
Jeez, look what Pratt/Mathieson did to Carlton for such a long time.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

THE THIN MAN said:
View attachment 1530080

When Kevin Sheedy and his wife Geraldine boarded Lindsay Fox’s luxury boat in New York to celebrate the ol’ trucker’s 85th birthday last month, the Essendon coaching legend was in a festive mood.

Like everyone, he’d been looking forward to getting overseas again. But most of all he was content that the football club he loved was finally about to get its own ship in order.

Sheedy knew there was one final piece to the puzzle which required his touch and that would be taken care of when he finished mingling with 400 of Australia’s most rich and famous on the extravagant getaway.

Sheedy had the belief that he and the new president David Barham — a go-getter type for sure — would have the final say on who be the new coach of Essendon.

A six-member panel had been formed, which interestingly included his former arch enemy Robert Walls, to canvas a number of candidates, but in the end it would be Sheedy and Barham to make the ultimate call.

Or so he’d thought.

‘IT’S SO POLITICAL, IT’S UNBELIEVABLE’: HOW DONS GOT HERE

FOOTBALL clubs are unique but what they most resemble is a political party.

Factions dictate direction and at Essendon, it has long been the case where too much influence has been given to former legends or supporters with deep pockets and big mouths.

This year, and not for the first time, the Old Guard v the New Guard has faced off.

“It’s so political, it’s unbelievable,” said one former staff member, who’d come from another AFL club, of the goings on at the club’s Tullamarine headquarters.

“People have got to stop playing politics at that football club and actually just think about what they’re doing.”

The Essendonians is proudly the oldest coterie group in the AFL. They wield considerable power — or so they say — given they can alter the amount of money they donate to the club depending on how they view its operations.

So, if they don’t like someone or something (ie former coach Matthew Knights) then the administrators soon fall into line (ie hiring of James Hird).

The behind-the-scenes politics is at the heart of the latest mess.

Who would’ve thought the Bombers would find themselves in such a laugh-a-minute schmozzle so soon after the gut-wrenching and soul-destroying supplements scandal?

While understandably that horrible chapter in the club’s history has taken its toll, and probably still does, the botched number of resets in recent years is what continues to outrage the faithful.

The latest had its origin back to midway through the season – the Bombers won just two games from the opening 11 matches – when several powerbrokers, including Sheedy, concluded that Ben Rutten wasn’t the answer as senior coach.

Despite having got the Bombers into the finals in his first full season in the job following the departure of John Worsfold, the lack of a solid game plan and the disturbing regression by a number of players had Rutten clearly under pressure.

Even then, Sheedy had an inkling for Hird.

The season swayed under the umbrella of a micky-mouse internal review, until the result of that review — namely to keep Rutten — produced a good old fashioned boardroom showdown.

In the pro Rutten camp were longstanding CEO Xavier Campbell and president Paul Brasher who’d also only been in the job for a year.

Across the table was Barham, who would ultimately take over the Essendon presidency after getting Sheedy’s backing.

In many respects, Barham was only president because of Sheedy. And Sheedy wanted Hird as coach. And Barham knew Sheedy wanted Hird as coach.

When the Bombers produced one of their worst performances of the season in round 22 at Marvel Stadium against Port Adelaide, losing by 84 points, Rutten was officially done.

Barham then made his move on Brasher, who in May had instigated the internal review of the underperforming football department. It was a quick kill. Brasher was forced into handing in his resignation as president the following day.

An external review into the entire operations of the club was launched immediately with former NAB boss and big-time Essendon fan Andrew Thorburn brought in to run it.

At the same time, Barham made his dash at coaching great Alastair Clarkson. His Hail Mary approach was too late and too unprofessional. And Clarkson agreed days later to join North Melbourne.

All the time, Rutten remained as the head coach.

It was humiliating for Rutten and unbecoming of a football club which, at its helm, had a man scrambling around like the Tassie Tiger cartoon character.

Barham kept Rutten hanging all week, forcing him to coach the final game of the season before knifing him the next day.

“You look at the way they treated Truck (Rutten), regardless if he can coach or not, you don’t treat people like that,” one former Essendon great said.

“If the president does that then anybody else at the club thinks they can do the same thing and get away with it. There’s your culture problem.”

Three days later, Campbell, who by this stage was barely communicating with Barham, fell on his sword. Then favourite son Simon Madden stepped down from the board and two other board members, Peter Allen and football director Sean Wellman, also signalled they would depart in the coming months.

It was brutal and badly handled.

The media giant Barham fumbled his first press conference, declaring the Bombers were after an experienced coach. It required football boss Josh Mahoney, who was leading the search for the new coach, to clarify Barham’s wishes days later when it became clear there weren’t any big fish desperate to get to Essendon.

One big fish who was becoming increasingly interested was Hird.

While his first stint in the top job at Essendon had ended horribly, and almost with his life, the club legend had put himself back into the football world as a part-time assistant helping his former teammate Mark McVeigh at the Giants.

Simply, he’d caught the bug again.

And Sheedy was quickly in his court, believing his premiership captain was exactly the man to pull his old club together again.

Hird believed it, too.

Further, it’s understood Hird and Barham had spoken several weeks previously and that Hird was assured he would be legitimately considered for the job.

No promises from Barham, but an assurance that he and Sheedy would be picking the coach.

So, Hird went for an interview.

And Sheedy went to New York.

The cunning old bugger’s plan was in train.

Already, whatever hope Barham had of landing Clarkson was scuppered when Sheedy suggested in a radio interview that Clarkson would be better suited at the Kangaroos.

In Sheedy’s mind, everything was in order.

HOW THE LAY OF THE LAND CHANGED AT ESSENDON

WHAT happened in the 12 days Sheedy was at sea is a mystery.

When he disembarked in Montreal, the lay of the land at Essendon had changed dramatically.

Four candidates had been interviewed by the Bombers panel which included Walls, Hawthorn premiership star Jordan Lewis, netball legend Simone McKinnins, football manager Josh Mahoney, board member Dorothy Hisgrove and consultant Thorburn.

Hird had reportedly impressed but he never heard back from the panel.

His former teammate Dean Solomon and St Kilda assistant Brendon Lade also only had one interview, while Melbourne assistant Adem Yze, who’d just missed out on the GWS job, received a second interview.

He was now the favourite.

And Hird? Media folk were emphatically declaring he had no chance — was there a leak from Essendon? — which left Hird pondering if he had been lied to.

As Grand Final week kicked in, and while Sheedy was still overseas, Barham’s focus shifted to former North Melbourne coach Brad Scott.

Scott had refused to say if he was officially interested in the role because, as the AFL’s football operations manager, he believed it wasn’t appropriate to be a candidate until the season had been completed.

After watching his twin Chris win another premiership with Geelong, Scott put his hand up to be interviewed the following Thursday, and then he met the Essendon board which included Sheedy via Zoom.

The so-called plan of Barham and Sheedy selecting the coach, presumably after considering recommendations from the selection panel, was ditched, which blindsided Sheedy.

There was no vote between Scott and Hird and even Yze per se.

Instead, after just the one interview, Scott was the nomination and he was voted in as the new coach. Not unanimously mind you.

Sheedy, who was in California, was shocked and disappointed.

He called the Herald Sun, wanting the world to know he voted for Hird.

He was widely condemned for “breaking ranks’’, but such is the cost of loyalty.

For sure, the bond between a captain and his coach in the AFL is special, far beyond any player-coach relationship.

Think Chris Scott and Joel Selwood, Damien Hardwick and Trent Cotchin, Leigh Matthews and Michael Voss. There is a trust, respect and appreciation which is there for life.

A true example came with Luke Hodge’s statement in support of Clarkson at the height of the Hawthorn scandal. He wanted his ex-coach to know that he was in his corner.

That’s exactly what Sheedy felt when he publicly declared he’d voted for Hird. He didn’t want anyone to think he’d turned his back on his captain.

It blazed headlines on the very day Scott was at his first press conference.

If the footy world thought the Sheedy bomb was a PR disaster, the appointment of Thorburn as CEO made the club a national embarrassment.

It was announced just hours before Monday night’s Crichton Medal count, which allowed Thorburn to address the assembled players and supporters.

Twenty hours later he was gone.

Barham’s “comprehensive” process to appoint Thorburn failed to look into his links with church organisation, City on a Hill, whose website revealed its offensive views on abortion, homosexuality and same-sex marriage.

His resignation after Essendon asked him to choose between the church and the football club ignited a political debate which has gone around the country and is still raging today.

Indeed, the process of appointing Thorburn to the role had put some staff at the football club off-side.

He’d been in charge of the external review and as part of that review, he had spoken to dozens of staff, urging them to tell him everything as he was an impartial observer.

Thorburn also interviewed candidates for the vacant CEO job, canvassing their IP, before deciding he would put his hand up for the gig.

Talk about a conflict of interest.

Still, Barham gave him the job.

“That was never going to be a safe environment for the employees,” one club insider said.

“He ran the review, the staff were honest with him, he was saying, ‘I’m impartial, tell me all your secrets’. Then suddenly it was like, ‘Oh by the way now all those things you said, I remember them and I’m now your CEO’.”

The man left standing is Barham who has conceded there has been some missteps along the way.

How Barham survives this mess is now a matter of great discussion and among those powerful coterie groups, there will be a group of people who think they can do better.

For sure, a board challenge is not out of the question.

Sheedy, meanwhile, will support Scott to the hilt.

And Hird? He probably thinks he was strung along, and if that is the truth, he will never have anything to do with the Essendon Football Club again.

Click to expand...

Honestly they should just close the place down and give the licence to Tassie. Bombers have got NFI.
 
Man I love reading this stuff about the Bombers. Just when you think the soap opera cannot deliver anymore, Sheedy pops up, Brasher has a conference, Hirdy has a sook, Blobbo writes some crap, they appoint a crook as CEO (who was supposedly leading their "Outside" review).

Come to think of it, didn't a few other board members resign. So that means there is even more fun to come. Who will they pick from the very large pool of disgraced ex-business and political people? Demetriou?

By the way, where is the Dodo? This is that special time of year who Dodo always "wins" the trade period. Has Sheedy stuffed him in a casket somewhere?

This is the best movie I have seen and it still has a long way to go!
 
Googstar said:
Man I love reading this stuff about the Bombers. Just when you think the soap opera cannot deliver anymore, Sheedy pops up, Brasher has a conference, Hirdy has a sook, Blobbo writes some crap, they appoint a crook as CEO (who was supposedly leading their "Outside" review).

Come to think of it, didn't a few other board members resign. So that means there is even more fun to come. Who will they pick from the very large pool of disgraced ex-business and political people? Demetriou?

By the way, where is the Dodo? This is that special time of year who Dodo always "wins" the trade period. Has Sheedy stuffed him in a casket somewhere?

This is the best movie I have seen and it still has a long way to go!
Click to expand...

Demetriou, that would be hilarious but is exactly the sort of thing they would do. 🤣

Dodo’s been keeping a very low profile of late.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Groupie_
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXIX
747 748 749 750 751
Replies
19K
Views
366K
lumpinee
lumpinee
Truetiger
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XL
285 286 287 288 289
Replies
7K
Views
135K
tigersnag
tigersnag
lumpinee
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVIII
400 401 402 403 404
Replies
10K
Views
241K
tropicaltiger
tropicaltiger
T
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVII
424 425 426 427 428
Replies
11K
Views
213K
DickieKnee
DickieKnee
beema limapep
  • Locked
US Election Day thread - results and mild observational discussion only
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
307
Views
4K
Muddiemoose
Muddiemoose
Hank Heavenly
  • Locked
No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVI
502 503 504 505 506
Replies
13K
Views
302K
tigers12
T
Meteoric Rise
Toast New Years AA Observations 2024....
Replies
15
Views
1K
JAKLAUGHING
JAKLAUGHING

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top