Our Grand Final strike-rate

[Sea fog]

Look at this for a strike-rate in GFs.

 

[Moeydw]

View attachment 756399Look at this for a strike-rate in GFs.

This has been discussed to death the past week.

 

[Baltimore Jack]

So, we just arbitrarily pick a time frame and then make a case as to why we are bad

 

[5_Flockhart]

So, we just arbitrarily pick a time frame and then make a case as to why we are bad

To be fair you couldn't arbitrarily pick a time frame for any other club that looks nearly as bad.

14 losses since 1960 is astounding. We aren't bad. We are perennial bridesmaids

 

[MagpieJoel]

We are all painfully aware. Not sure why this needs a thread.

 

[Baltimore Jack]

To be fair you couldn't arbitrarily pick a time frame for any other club that looks nearly as bad.

14 losses since 1960 is astounding. We aren't bad. We are perennial bridesmaids

I pick 10 years, that gets us to 33%

 

[Kirby]

We didn't even come runner up this year ffs. How's it even relevant?

 

[CFC2010]

We are all painfully aware. Not sure why this needs a thread.

 

[Sea fog]

I think the time-frame has been selected because it probably represents roughly the life-span of quite a few of our fans.

 

[SpongePie]

I think the time-frame has been selected because it probably represents roughly the life-span of quite a few of our fans.

That also makes no sense.

The only reasonable timeframes that can be used in these scenarios are,
1) all time
2) since the AFL came to be
3) within the time frame of the latest coach

anything else is completely arbitrary

 

[Sea fog]

That also makes no sense.

The only reasonable timeframes that can be used in these scenarios are,
1) all time
2) since the AFL came to be
3) within the time frame of the latest coach

anything else is completely arbitrary

I agree it is arbitrary but it does explain how aggrieved some fans feel. It is also hard to imagine that you could pick any time-frame for any of the other Vic. clubs and find a hit-rate so damning.

 

[jonbe54]

I think the time-frame has been selected because it probably represents roughly the life-span of quite a few of our fans.

The time frame has been selected because it suits the narrative of course.

FFS.

 

[Nardz]

I challenge anybody to pick a timeframe that makes our grand final record look good.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[Baltimore Jack]

I challenge anybody to pick a timeframe that makes our grand final record look good.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

October 2010....100%

 

[gerryg400]

I challenge anybody to pick a timeframe that makes our grand final record look good.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

1927 to 1930.

 

[Nardz]

1927 to 1930.

I knew there'd be a smart ass. I would have added "that includes our last premiership/grand final"

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[gerryg400]

I knew there'd be a smart ass. I would have added "that includes our last premiership/grand final"

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

But you didn't add it, so you are a dumb-arse.

 

[Markfs]

There's only one solution to this..... the club should invest in a time machine and change the course of history. I suggest some form of levy on the membership.

 

[Tranquilli37]

How many prelims have the pies played all up?

 

[danielnajdek]

Pretty sure every Pies fans knows this not sure why we need a thread about it.

 

[jonbe54]

I challenge anybody to pick a timeframe that makes our grand final record look good.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Sunshine it goes further back than 27 - 30.

Try this smart @rse . .

1902, 1903, 1910, 1917, 1919, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1935,

10 FLAGS in 33 years - that is a 1 in 3 strike rate.

1927 - 1935 is 5 in 8 years which is better than 1 in 2.

Confucius say . . .

Always better to load brain before firing mouth.

Fkin lol what a nuffie.

 

[Nardz]

I'm quickly remembering why I stopped posting here all those years ago...

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[jonbe54]

I'm quickly remembering why I stopped posting here all those years ago...

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

Considering your obvious agenda I don't doubt it.

 

[Sea fog]

Sunshine it goes further back than 27 - 30.

Try this smart @rse . .

1902, 1903, 1910, 1917, 1919, 1927, 1928, 1929, 1930, 1935,

10 FLAGS in 33 years - that is a 1 in 3 strike rate.

1927 - 1935 is 5 in 8 years which is better than 1 in 2.

Confucius say . . .

Always better to load brain before firing mouth.

Fkin lol what a nuffie.

Would have fun being a Pie fan during those times.

 

[joff]

This old chestnut again FFS