When a team wins by 6 or 7 goals there is a fair chance the winning team are going to get most of the votes. The fact is he didn't kick 10 goals and if the rules had been interpreted correctly he would have only had 3,then would the person giving the votes have included him.? I thought Mitch Carroll was solid all day and if a Raider was going to get a vote probably Mossop or Doolan. And just to clear the air this is not an attempt to bag Matt Fowler who is a nice bloke and a damn good footballer.
I thought the votes were okay. I thought Luke Carroll could even have pinched a vote, he was great down back when the Tigers were under the pump, and then instramental when going into the middle after half-time, but when you've got a forward who has kicked 3 more than the next best on his team and 4 more than any opposing forward, it's obvious he was the dominant forward on the ground. He did miss a couple of sitters and should have had at least 8. Everyone is going to view it differently on how he came about getting the ball, personally, I thought he was on the end of some pretty good delivery, which hasn't always been the case this season.
Raiders had some good players pushing for votes, but the likes of Way, Doolan and Kahlfeldt who had plenty of it in the first half, were barely sighted after the main break. Mossop I thought was a good contributor, but the fact that he didn't hurt Albury on the scoreboard lessens his impact.