- Sep 25, 2013
- 16,122
- 31,139
No I haven't.
Righto.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No I haven't.
Yeah great comeback.I was hoping for something with a little more substance and a little less troll garbage, but maybe I set unrealistic expectations.
So your statement is obviously inaccurate.Righto.
Yeah great comeback.
You don't need to ask. There are pages of discussion in this thread where I've aired my views. Go and read them if you're all about the "contribution".Thanks mate.
I'll ask again - got anything worthwhile to contribute or are you done?
You don't need to ask.
So your statement is obviously inaccurate.
Please. Just stop - you're embarrassing yourself.Have you tried and failed again?
Maybe one day.
I think it's possible that Carlton believes that they have paid Cripps above his value for years and now that the club is coming into a more successful period that it's his turn to take less to benefit the side.Do you really think we would have priced ourselves out of offering our captain and best player a contract by spending on Williams and Saad?
I think it's possible that Carlton believes that they have paid Cripps above his value for years and now that the club is coming into a more successful period that it's his turn to take less to benefit the side.
What on earth is this? An actual comment about Patrick CrippsI think it's possible that Carlton believes that they have paid Cripps above his value for years and now that the club is coming into a more successful period that it's his turn to take less to benefit the side.
It's possible, but that's a separate point to that which I responded to, which seemed to suggest that one reason why we wouldn't match a bid on Cripps is because we couldn't afford to do so on the back of bringing in Williams and Saad.
If the plan is to allocate less money for Cripps to move more into other players then it's exactly the issue. Getting Williams and Saad with some of that Cripps money expecting to sign him for a $300,000 discount and then another club offers him a $300,000 payrise and now it's $600,000 difference a year. That's Saad.
WA country boys are loyal though. The issue would be if his partner needs to live on the big country block in WA, because everyone would expect him to be loyal to her first before the club.
Catch is even if it's a $600,000 pay difference it will be reported in WA as being about family.
I think it's possible that Carlton believes that they have paid Cripps above his value for years and now that the club is coming into a more successful period that it's his turn to take less to benefit the side.
Do you really think we would have priced ourselves out of offering our captain and best player a contract by spending on Williams and Saad?
I think it's possible that Carlton believes that they have paid Cripps above his value for years and now that the club is coming into a more successful period that it's his turn to take less to benefit the side.
So Carlton knows what the cap situation looks like for 2022 to 2026?
I recall the clubs not being happy with the AFL 'handballing' the problem of staying under the revised lower cap. "Just back end your deals" I think was their advice.
The article came out saying there will be 17 'Collingwoods' next trade period who will need to push good players out simply to keep the good players they need.
So simply saying "we planned for Cripps" doesn't really work because no one planned for covid cuts.
There won't be a $600,000 pay difference unless Cripps is being offered one of if not the biggest contract the league has ever seen.
So Carlton knows what the cap situation looks like for 2022 to 2026?
The article came out saying there will be 17 'Collingwoods' next trade period who will need to push good players out simply to keep the good players they need.
So simply saying "we planned for Cripps" doesn't really work because no one planned for covid cuts.
And yes, the Eagles will likely be in a similar situation however the end of 2021 they will see Kennedy and Hurn retire that will free up cash.
Eagles can't afford another Kelly trade. No decent picks for three straight drafts sounds bat sh!t crazy. I'd be happy to agree to trade say Bailey Williams or maybe Jarrod Cameronto the Blues for a 3rd or 4th rounder if Cripps comes across as a FA. Maybe Brander has a breakout year in 2021 and can help with a side deal.PLAYERCARDSTART39Jarrod Cameron
- Age
- 24
- Ht
- 182cm
- Wt
- 70kg
- Pos.
- Fwd
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 7.0
- 2star
- K
- 4.7
- 2star
- HB
- 2.3
- 2star
- M
- 1.7
- 2star
- T
- 3.6
- 5star
- G
- 1.3
- 5star
- D
- 5.0
- 1star
- K
- 3.5
- 1star
- HB
- 1.5
- 1star
- M
- 0.5
- 1star
- T
- 2.5
- 3star
- G
- 0.5
- 4star
- D
- 8.0
- 2star
- K
- 5.6
- 3star
- HB
- 2.4
- 3star
- M
- 2.0
- 3star
- T
- 4.2
- 5star
- G
- 2.0
- 5star
PLAYERCARDEND
If getting him was the difference between a lower 8 finish or potentially a top 4 finish and a real crack at another flag before kennedy retires it would be worth itI don't believe this line any more. There's always ways to move money around.
WC will have whatever they pay Kennedy and Hurn off the books and then backend a bunch of other deals. And then it just depends how far down the road you're willing to kick the can.
The question is whether WC should pay that wage. I think probably not. And it's partially why I think he stays put.
A first round pick and brayshaw for cripps..if i was west coast id be bighting off carltons arm to sign that deal before they changed their mindIt's cute when supporters pretend to speak for the club.