PAUL CHAPMAN

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

markm106 said:
Would be interesting if he went to the Hawks. Would probably be his most disliked team

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Would have thought Swans had that covered now .
 
Its gonna be a thin draft we're told. Freo should grab him along with J-pod and just go for a flag while the Pav is still there.
 
I think Essendon should seriously consider Chapman. With no draft position for two years and faced with a choice of a speculative third round pick vs a proven champion (albeit @32 years) I know what I would take first.
 
Jab said:
You called?

You're welcome.
Click to expand...
Hi Mr Jab, if your so offended by the word Jab, I don't understand why you would call yourself Jab. A 5 day ban for calling someone by there name. So, now I have mentioned Your name, "Jab" as many times as I did to get a 5 day ban, will I get another 5 day ban Jab :eek:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Another user thread banned. Thanks for coming.

Lets keep this thread, and all others on the D&T Board, on track and in line with the topic(s) at hand. Not that hard.
 
theflea said:
If you can play chappy in the ruck i'll shut up.
Click to expand...

i have a novel idea lets play him as a sml forward who spend good time in the middle.

na we dont need him, we have quality sml forwards in king lol, nahas oh dear, and white whoops that hack walked.
na we dont need a quality sml forward we have the position covered.

last time i looked we finished 5th. the clubs aim next yr is probably similar with top 4 being hopeful.
but we dont need to address with quality a position that has dogged us for yrs. thats unbelievable.
we can go give brad miller yrs because we lack in a position. we can give orren stephenson 2yrs because we lack cover but we cant take a quality player when we lack a sml forward.
chapman is actually a perfect fit for us even if its for only one or two yrs.
we have one junior sml forward who looks okay but has a way to go mcdonough would learn heaps of chappy.
 
santa claws said:
i have a novel idea lets play him as a sml forward who spend good time in the middle.

na we dont need him, we have quality sml forwards in king lol, nahas oh dear, and white whoops that hack walked.
na we dont need a quality sml forward we have the position covered.

last time i looked we finished 5th. the clubs aim next yr is probably similar with top 4 being hopeful.
but we dont need to address with quality a position that has dogged us for yrs. thats unbelievable.
we can go give brad miller yrs because we lack in a position. we can give orren stephenson 2yrs because we lack cover but we cant take a quality player when we lack a sml forward.
chapman is actually a perfect fit for us even if its for only one or two yrs.
we have one junior sml forward who looks okay but has a way to go mcdonough would learn heaps of chappy.
Click to expand...

You actually finished 7th but agree that Chapman would be a good fit at Richmond, certainly a better forward line option than Nahas.
 
santa claws said:
i have a novel idea lets play him as a sml forward who spend good time in the middle.

na we dont need him, we have quality sml forwards in king lol, nahas oh dear, and white whoops that hack walked.
na we dont need a quality sml forward we have the position covered.

last time i looked we finished 5th. the clubs aim next yr is probably similar with top 4 being hopeful.
but we dont need to address with quality a position that has dogged us for yrs. thats unbelievable.
we can go give brad miller yrs because we lack in a position. we can give orren stephenson 2yrs because we lack cover but we cant take a quality player when we lack a sml forward.
chapman is actually a perfect fit for us even if its for only one or two yrs.
we have one junior sml forward who looks okay but has a way to go mcdonough would learn heaps of chappy.
Click to expand...

I would think he will cost us too much in the tpp.
 
The Bomb said:
5th vs 8th
Richmond 5th vs Carlton 8th
Click to expand...
At the end of the home and away season, Richmond finished 5th. At the end of the football season, Richmond were deemed to have finished 7th as a result of being eliminated in the first week of the finals whilst ranking higher than the Pies due to their respective h&a finishing positions.
 
spudmaster said:
At the end of the home and away season, Richmond finished 5th. At the end of the football season, Richmond were deemed to have finished 7th as a result of being eliminated in the first week of the finals whilst ranking higher than the Pies due to their respective h&a finishing positions.
Click to expand...


I have had 1 too may I think.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

PAUL CHAPMAN

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top