Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I know he is tied to an NGA but I'd still take a dip at Kako at pick #5 and see if the Bombers blink.
Best small forward in the pool and I reckon he'd make a good duo with Pickett.
All the good teams have a great group of smalls. I don't want to see us run it back with Chandler or DJ Shitboy as Pickett's running mate.
Agree here, Hawthorn and Pies are the two fastest ball movement teams but not because they are littered with speedy players.I think you're conflating speed with an ability to operate in space and think quickly.
Bont and Pendles aren't the fastest players around, but they find space and use it well. I think Langford (and probably Reid) can do that as well.
We don't need someone with leg speed for the sake of leg speed.
Kako would be a great get but no way Bombers don't take him just because we bid at 5 which will be 6 by then.I know he is tied to an NGA but I'd still take a dip at Kako at pick #5 and see if the Bombers blink.
Best small forward in the pool and I reckon he'd make a good duo with Pickett.
All the good teams have a great group of smalls. I don't want to see us run it back with Chandler or DJ Shitboy as Pickett's running mate.
Turns out I had time. Done nowNew Fox rankings (will update when I have time lol)
Top draft prospects ranked 1-50: AFL stars they all play like and the clubs keen on them
Draft prospects ranked 1-50: AFL stars they play like — and what clubs could pick themwww.foxsports.com.au
That was a very long 16 minutes, not gonna lie.Turns out I had time. Done now
I think we do need a couple of small defenders with both leg speed, and the IQ to setup attacking moves by foot.We're linked to reaching for pretty much every KPF according to that list. Not surprised by the main guys we are linked to but it was a bit of a surprise to see us mentioned as possibly considering Lindsay at pick 5.
Going to blow a gasket if we draft a forward. Wouldn't matter if we drafted Buddy or Plugger into this team with the way we move the footy.We're linked to reaching for pretty much every KPF according to that list. Not surprised by the main guys we are linked to but it was a bit of a surprise to see us mentioned as possibly considering Lindsay at pick 5.
I've got doubts we would take one of the KPF's at 5 or 9. It seems to me like lazy journalism, but I've come to expect that.Going to blow a gasket if we draft a forward. Wouldn't matter if we drafted Buddy or Plugger into this team with the way we move the footy.
I'm definitely not against taking Lindsay, just surprised to see him linked at 5 as he's mostly been ranked in the teens. JT's never shy about "reaching" for a player that goes against the grain early on, so if he picks Lindsay I'll be on board.I think we do need a couple of small defenders with both leg speed, and the IQ to setup attacking moves by foot.
I've had Lindsay as an preference option with our picks for a while now.
Another i like as an option is Berry, I can also see him as a Zorko like small defender, who can spot-up free players inside the corridor, or run & carry the footy himself thru our corridor.
Just 2 options there, however jSmith still looms, as well as Lalor, FO's, Draper...
The optimist in me thinks that if we draft a forward that we might drop Petty to the magoos.
I've got doubts we would take one of the KPF's at 5 or 9. It seems to me like lazy journalism, but I've come to expect that.
I'm definitely not against taking Lindsay, just surprised to see him linked at 5 as he's mostly been ranked in the teens. JT's never shy about "reaching" for a player that goes against the grain early on, so if he picks Lindsay I'll be on board.
At least we didn't give up and got him eventuallyMost people who do phantom drafts have clubs they don’t support reaching to drive the agenda there fav teams will clean up.
I remember one year they had us taking Harley Balic at pick 7 in the phantoms.
I really like Lindsay, without injuries he would be much higher rated. Think 5 is too much of a reach but onboard for doing it at 9.I've got doubts we would take one of the KPF's at 5 or 9. It seems to me like lazy journalism, but I've come to expect that.
I'm definitely not against taking Lindsay, just surprised to see him linked at 5 as he's mostly been ranked in the teens. JT's never shy about "reaching" for a player that goes against the grain early on, so if he picks Lindsay I'll be on board.