Janus
Advocatus Diaboli
- Sep 9, 2007
- 23,415
- 57,302
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Dallas Cowboys, Chicago Bulls
Always wanted to trade out of next years draft so it’s a tick from me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
That's why I like Port's move today. You just can't complain about it.Doesnt really matter. Weve made sure we get 3 + Mead now.
If we had made no trade we still wouldve got ’3 plus Mead’ but one of them would come in 2020, and we couldve still done something with 29That's why I like Port's move today. You just can't complain about it.
Or a lot more. I'm not one of those who thinks there has to be a clear winner or loser from trades. They should be win-win. I'm struggling to think of one's in the last 7 years, for either players in or out where you'd even go 'Yep, Port were clearly on the plus side of that trade', let alone 'Port made out like bandits there'. I'd honestly rather have Dodo as our list manager and get 4 out of 5 trades going nowhere, as the other 1 you'd make out like bandits.It does feel like we always offer a bit more than was really needed.
I'm all for it, 'no guts no glory'.
If I look at it over a 3 year period I'm pretty happy however they damn well do it, as follows:
2018 > Rozee + Duursma + Butters
2019 > McAsey, Kemp, Robertson, Stephens, Weightman, Worrell, Gould, De Koning, Day, Sharp, Pickett (choose 3 of)
2019 > + Mead + Burgoyne
2020 > Schofield + Jones + ...
Bring it on.
Or a lot more. I'm not one of those who thinks there has to be a clear winner or loser from trades. They should be win-win. I'm struggling to think of one's in the last 7 years, for either players in or out where you'd even go 'Yep, Port were clearly on the plus side of that trade', let alone 'Port made out like bandits there'. I'd honestly rather have Dodo as our list manager and get 4 out of 5 trades going nowhere, as the other 1 you'd make out like bandits.
Unless they got someone in mind they really want this year?If we had made no trade we still wouldve got ’3 plus Mead’ but one of them would come in 2020, and we couldve still done something with 29
It does if it carries over to next year.doesn't matter, we will only select 4 players anyway.
Presumably this is the case.Unless they got someone in mind they really want this year?
There’s a whole year to wait and see tbh.And are happy with Taj next year?
Such a way with words. Good one.We get shit done though.
Might not always be good shit or bad shit but shit gets done.
Plenty of clubs get fu** all shit done good bad or otherwise.
No. I just beat you to it as a matter of fact.Am I the only one remotely optimistic about the prospect of 5 or 6 first round picks in 2 seasons, backing up an excellent haul this season?
Playing pokies isn’t taking a risk! It’s just plain stupidity, those machines are riggedTell that to the thousands of people down at the pubs blowing all their money on the pokies.. lol
I used to design the software that runs them, they aint rigged. They are 100% random. The reels are just static and set up with fixed combinations that over time will mathematically return only 85-90% to the player. The best option on a pokie machine is the gamble function. It is legitimately a 50/50 random option every time.Playing pokies isn’t taking a risk! It’s just plain stupidity, those machines are rigged
So youre Telling me it's totally 50/50 between who profits and who doesn't??? Between gambler and owner???I used to design the software that runs them, they aint rigged. They are 100% random. The reels are just static and set up with fixed combinations that over time will mathematically return only 85-90% to the player. The best option on a pokie machine is the gamble function. It is legitimately a 50/50 random option every time.
Picking Kemp a first round prospect that we won't see at AFL level until 2021 would make me feel a bit betterSomething that Ken has zero involvement in has my support. I reckon if we keep the 3 picks and Kemp is there we will take that punt.
To me it stinks of ’we have no plan for recruiting our next focal KPF so lets flank it up baybeeee’It stinks of ‘make finals next year or die trying’.
52 and 55 = 453, plus we have other later picks (66, 67, 68, 71) with 237 points attached. Depending on how many picks we need to take (I can't remember), it feels like we are fine.
690 points worth of late picks there ..... allows us to match 860 points (with a 20% discount)... which is roughly pick 22 give or take given earlier bids.
To me it stinks of ’we have no plan for recruiting our next focal KPF so lets flank it up baybeeee’