In terms of dealing with Sydney I think its fair.
We will wait and see I guess. Fair to say ill be over the moon if we get him for pick 14.
So you think it's just "fair", but you'll be over the moon if it happens? Sorry but that pick wont cut it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
In terms of dealing with Sydney I think its fair.
We will wait and see I guess. Fair to say ill be over the moon if we get him for pick 14.
All these clubs after ruckman, might be worth floating Mark Blake on the market
Before a few people wet their pants with excitement, remember that IF Jolly leaves it only means we need a ruckman more, it doesn't mean anything in terms of what other clubs might offer for Seaby.
If, for example, Port were going to offer a 3rd rounder for Seaby, Sydney losing Jolly wont make them up their offer. Making sense yet?
So you think it's just "fair", but you'll be over the moon if it happens? Sorry but that pick wont cut it.
I think its fair because of the history between the two clubs. Fair to say we helped you out through the late 90's early 2000's giving you best and fairest after best and fairest (Williams Schauble), then gave you nick davis who got you to the GF you won, and now shaw last year who was one of your best players this year (id assume top 3 b/f?). Its only fair that if a player wants to move the other way that Sydney will help us get it done.
Ill be over the moon because we need a big ruckman.
I think its fair because of the history between the two clubs. Fair to say we helped you out through the late 90's early 2000's giving you best and fairest after best and fairest (Williams Schauble), then gave you nick davis who got you to the GF you won, and now shaw last year who was one of your best players this year (id assume top 3 b/f?). Its only fair that if a player wants to move the other way that Sydney will help us get it done.
Ill be over the moon because we need a big ruckman.
I don't want to be mean, because you seem genuinely nice about all this, but you're being unrealistic. Those trades that you mention weren't favours to Sydney, and they wont be reflected upon during any talks about what Sydney requires from Collingwood.
You make a compelling srgument, but jolly is a top 5 player in the sydney line-up and is vital cog in our gameplan, without him we are pretty much screwed
the players that you traded us were just handy players to you, and were not even in your top 10, and jolly is a top 5 ruckman of the AFL
Like i said before, i heard McGlynn and Kennedy were being thrown around with talks with Sydney, maybe this could be a deal for him?
Yeah in some ways I am, but I think the Nick Davis trade Sydney played pretty hard ball and Collingwood could've easily said no and put him in the preseason draft, but we accepted your 2nd round pick to allow him to go where he wanted. I would hope that a similar arrangement will be made when trading the other way.
It certainly wouldn't be. You could only get him if one and most like both your likel trades fell apart. Hawthorn have got contracts agreed so they fit within the salary cap and there would be a huge risk that if Jolly became available you would a) need a 1st Round Pick and b) need to clear even more space in the salary than you had planned on because he is on a huge contract and the Swans won't agree to pay part of that contract.
He would be the highest earner of the three you would be trying to trade for and the Swans would be asking for a lot more than McGlynn, Kennedy and a 1st Round Pick.
I think that Pick 14 is a reasonable offer.
You need to realise that Collingwood trading pick 14 for cameron Wood has scared most clubs from offering too much for ruckmen.
If we netted Jolly & Fev, we win the flag in 2010.
Why? One was out of contact and seeking to move back to his home state and the other is still under contract and is seeking to move back to his home state before the end of said contract (a full two years early in fact). Each trade we made with Collingwood has been different and this possible trade for Jolly will not be made with one eye on the past.
Yes we will be expecting a 1st Round Draft Pick, but we will be expecting a player (maybe two) in return. Would you object to a trade involve Pick 14 and Nathan Brown?? Also if we sent a 3rd Round Pick back your way would you object to Brad Dick also being included?? Yes player wise for a Collingwood point of view we might be asking a bit too much, but we are trading a contracted player who is Top 5 in the AFL for his position. Heck I would even accept a early second round pick (if you guys could get you hands on one) if both those players were included. But I guess this is the point of a trade, asking and coming up with an acceptable trade for both sides.
I heard whispers that Hawthorn were going to make a play for him by offering Sydney McGlynn and Kennedy....
Commiserations Sydney Swans. First dealing with Hawthorn last year and now Collingwood. Could it get worse? Nobody wants to go to Port Adelaide do they?
Commiserations Sydney Swans. First dealing with Hawthorn last year and now Collingwood. Could it get worse? Nobody wants to go to Port Adelaide do they?
Alot more than pick 9, Kennedy & McGlynn??