Player X vs Y

[VijoMorganstein]

Any opinions on Matthew Stokes v Nathan Jones?
Stokes seems to be scoring more consistently but Jones' higher ceiling is tempting

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

Any opinions on Matthew Stokes v Nathan Jones?
Stokes seems to be scoring more consistently but Jones' higher ceiling is tempting

Don't like either options TBH. At this point of the season you bring in keepers who you think will finish in the top echelon of their respective positions. Stokes and Jones aren't those types of players to me. Do you have the funds to "upgrade" a Stokes/Jones to a more premo keeper?

 

[BuddysBuddy23]

Burgoyne v Hanley v Birchall. Any thoughts?

 

[Slawk]

Any opinions on Matthew Stokes v Nathan Jones?
Stokes seems to be scoring more consistently but Jones' higher ceiling is tempting

Generally no opinion on that. I suppose I'd always be very on edge selecting a premium from Melbourne so probably Stokes.

Goddard for $20k less?

Barlow for $10k more?

 

[lids2richo]

Burgoyne v Hanley v Birchall. Any thoughts?

Burgoyne. Playing much more consistently this year. Especially than the other two

 

[Slawk]

Burgoyne v Hanley v Birchall. Any thoughts?

I've put a line through Hanley personally.

Being conservative I'd probably try to find the extra $55k for Burgoyne's consistency (this year at least, so far...)

 

[Slawk]

Goddard ($505,000) VS Rockliff ($585,000)?

 

[JohnnyDrama1]

Goddard ($505,000) VS Rockliff ($585,000)?

If money is an issue, Goddard, but if it's not, Rockliff.

 

[JohnnyDrama1]

M. Johnson vs Malceski vs Burgoyne?
Not sure Burgoyne will hold his form as history shows he isn't a supercoach reliant player , that being said, he has been awesome this year. Malceski and Johnson more POD, and couldn't decide between them if it came to them two.

 

[stevebbb]

M. Johnson vs Malceski vs Burgoyne?
Not sure Burgoyne will hold his form as history shows he isn't a supercoach reliant player , that being said, he has been awesome this year. Malceski and Johnson more POD, and couldn't decide between them if it came to them two.

I'd look at Johnson... doesn't look like Freo will lose for the next 9 matches, COULD be easy points for him
Doggies, Adelaide (PS), Tigers, Lions (PS), Eagles (WA derby), Melbourne, GWS (PS), Saints, Carlton (PS)

their SC finals run is tough though

 

[JohnnyDrama1]

I'd look at Johnson... doesn't look like Freo will lose for the next 9 matches, COULD be easy points for him
Doggies, Adelaide (PS), Tigers, Lions (PS), Eagles (WA derby), Melbourne, GWS (PS), Saints, Carlton (PS)

their SC finals run is tough though

At least it's better than it being ridiculously easy and Ross Lyon resting half their team And good thing about that is if it's hard teams it means the ball will be down in defense more, and he relies on intercept marks.

 

[saint_nick]

Johnson 599k vs watson 551k vs barlow 536k

 

[leng jai]

I always love these "easy draw" theories that people come up with. Most of the time it's only applicable for massive downhill skiers like Harvey and Sucking IMO.

 

[toxic]

Johnson 599k vs watson 551k vs barlow 536k

Sj and watson provide VC options. Barlow doesnt but at his price he's insane value.
If u have gaj, Pendles and jelwood already go barlow

 

[gh172]

Goddard or Griffen?

 

[SnappyHappy]

1) Goddard v Montagna v SJ - in order, not for this week, but for when each one bottoms out

2) Shenton (155k) v K.Mitchell (240k)

 

[leng jai]

1) Goddard v Montagna v SJ - in order, not for this week, but for when each one bottoms out

2) Shenton (155k) v K.Mitchell (240k)

1) Goddard has already bottomed out at 465k two weeks ago. Out of those three I'd get SJ next week or the week after depending on how he scores against Sydney. Wouldn't touch Montagna now.

2) I'd only consider Mitchell if he's going to be actually on the field. If you're just generating cash then he's kinda pointless.

 

[SnappyHappy]

1) Goddard has already bottomed out at 465k two weeks ago. Out of those three I'd get SJ next week or the week after depending on how he scores against Sydney. Wouldn't touch Montagna now.

2) I'd only consider Mitchell if he's going to be actually on the field. If you're just generating cash then he's kinda pointless.

Yeah getting Goddard this week. SJ when he bottoms out.

Mitchell would be my M8 as opposed to L.Taylor. His JS isn't great though so I'll be staying away from Mitchell

 

[saint_nick]

Sj and watson provide VC options. Barlow doesnt but at his price he's insane value.
If u have gaj, Pendles and jelwood already go barlow

I have all of those, and fyfe aswell. Would you still go barlow with fyfe too?

 

[SnappyHappy]

I have all of those, and fyfe aswell. Would you still go barlow with fyfe too?

I'd go Watson

 

[toxic]

I have all of those, and fyfe aswell. Would you still go barlow with fyfe too?

Absolutely

 

[toxic]

Goddard or Griffen?

What price are they?

Griffen starting to tackle again, when he does that he tends to score big, if he starts kicking yoals again he'll score really big

Lots of . . . . Ifs tho

 

[gh172]

What price are they?

Griffen starting to tackle again, when he does that he tends to score big, if he starts kicking yoals again he'll score really big

Lots of . . . . Ifs tho

I think Griffen is around 517k.

 

[Jiska]

Barlow, Goddard, Griffen all cheap as chips with Joey Montagna to bottom out soon.

 

[Jiska]

Goddard vs Barlow?