Jack-Packenham said:Houli has had a better TAC cup career and rep career than any of the Victorians in the draft.
which means nothing in the AFL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Jack-Packenham said:Houli has had a better TAC cup career and rep career than any of the Victorians in the draft.
But you quite simply can't be sure of that.Weaver said:Because the #8 player on our list will still be there at #13.
Richmond want elite, running midfielders. We don't want Collard, Jetta and the rovers. We don't want Reiwoldt, Brown and the other 2nd-tier forwards.
If anything the running guys we are after Edwards, Boak, O'Keefe, Houlihan, Hawksley etc will be all around a bit later. We will probably still end up reaching for the guy we want despite dropping 5 places.
We will get the same player at #13 that we would have gotten at #8 and a 'free' ready to go 23 year old CHB to address an immediate need.
Bentleigh said:Sellar of late has dropped out of many peoples top 10 and seems to be sliding. I don't think he should be automatically selected in the "recruiters outstanding top 8" based on that.
Sellar appears to be a ruckman who is too small to ruck at AFL level, and not a 'proper' KPP. Will be intersting to see what Richmond do if he is still around at #13.
I'd imagine if we wanted a slow rover or a ruckman we probably would have drafted Angus Monfries or Cameron Wood, both of whom were highly rated, and both of whom were available at our pick.In_Like_Flint said:Collingwood did send pick seven and Nixon to the Hawks for pick 10 so we should listen to Vinnie.
Would the Pies have drafted Lewis or Meesen with pick seven?
Thunderstruck said:Sellar is NOT a ruckman, he stated so himself. Is just used there because at the time he is the best option a team has had, generally as a backup only.
His illness resulted in him underperforming for much of the 2nd half of the season. What he can do he showed last year and the start of this year. Without a doubt he is a CHF and a very good and mobile one at that. Very strong hands/contested mark, good leap, solid motor, good pace and leadership and clean below the knees. He gets well beaten in the ruck at SANFL so no point trying to make him one at AFL he will get destroyed every week. Definitely a CHF who is every bit as good as Gumby/Hansen/Thorp when he is fit and firing. His past performances have shown that.
So basically anyone who gets him if he slides a bit is certainly getting a very very good player.
Ya Can't See Me! said:Daniel O Keefe is a f**king gun! Reads the ball better than anyone in the whole draft, very few would have better skills and even though he is not that tall is terrific overhead with a great football brain. He is a modest bloke and will make it a long way well i hope so anyway.
Summed it up perfectly - I've been saying this is the case for a while now.Crow-mo said:no players have grown in reputation. NONE.
what happens is that more information about what the people who matter really think leaks out into the public domain.
put another way, we find out a bit more about what the professionals have always thought. In no way, is a player becoming more highly regarded.
take last year for instance, Dale Thomas appeared to be a bolter - but in reality, those who thought he was a second rounder were just wrong. He did not go from second round prospect to no.2 overall - he was always in the top tier.
same thing will happen this year, more accurate information will reveal itself - the original positions on players were incorrect. again look at Joel Selwood, he was being neglected because of injury until one of the recruiters started talking about how they hadn't forget him - his rating was constant, our knowledge of his rating was not.
sort of like this thread, aye Bentleigh?Shortened
* Erick Mckenzie
* Daniel Connors
Dropped off a tad
* James Sellar
* Albert Proud
To slightly stray off topic the more I think about it the more I see Millers work as a masterstroke.
To grab a Polak in exchange for (more or less) only stepping back 5 places (8 -> 13) in a draft where names like; Proud, Sellar, Jetta, Armitage, Mckenzie, Connors etc. all seem to have alot going for them but very hard to split into a 'order' outside the top handful (six or so) is a good peice of work.