the paper at least deserves a right of reply before we hang the bastards!
Why? That paper wouldn't wait for a reply to hang a person. Its what they do, whip up a frenzy based on not very much and when they get caught out publish a paragraph on page 23 apologising for getting the story wrong.
That paper does deserve a right of reply.
Why? That paper wouldn't wait for a reply to hang a person. Its what they do, whip up a frenzy based on not very much and when they get caught out publish a paragraph on page 23 apologising for getting the story wrong.
That paper does deserve a right of reply.