Port Adelaide lose by 3 points after a wrong Goal Review against the Crows in the dying stages

[PowerForGood]

If we don't use the camera angles that SHOW the ball hitting the post..... utter farce.

This is the most gutted and cheated I can remember feeling at a game. Incl last years Shuey final.

 

[OniAu]

Millions and Millions of dollars made by AFL each year. Cant afford Camera angles for score reviews or some other system.
Classic AFL

 

[SilentHunter_]

Get rid of Gill and his stooges.

 

[Macpotata]

The ball clearly hit the post, Jenkins said it to his team mate after the goal, admitted it after the game on camera and the review showed it hit the post. It was called a goal after the review.


Poor officiating. Could cost them top 4 or a finals birth.

 

[HighBudget]

****ing rigged bullshit, ****ing done with the AFL

 

[DamoESP]

"My grandma raised me not to tell fibs. I think it hit the post."

 

[Big Cox 88]

You can see the ball pass in front of the post.

 

[Aussie Assault]

Great game overshadowed by a half arsed "she'll be right" AFL approach.

 

[DarkSaint]

Could be a double chance wasted for port and season nailed shut for crows. Massive in the context of the season.

 

[Dav]

You can see the ball pass in front of the post.

Player admitted it. They used the worst possible camera angle for it.

 

[YippeeYiYeo]

If we don't use the camera angles that SHOW the ball hitting the post..... utter farce.

This is the most gutted and cheated I can remember feeling at a game. Incl last years Shuey final.

remind me again what happened in the Shuey final?

 

[Aussie_boy]

I've never understood why they play it at like 0.25 speed when it's so much easier to decide at normal speed.

 

[W.C. Fry]

Clearly? Watched all the replays and still can't tell. Umpires call.

 

[ShanDog]

You can see the ball pass in front of the post.

If you think that, I suggest that much like the AFL, you need to upgrade your tv screen. Goal review ump either uses the force to make decisions, or they are using a ten year old 19" computer monitor to do the goal reviews on.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

It's a dark moment for sure. Score Review clearly rushed. I remember we had a review in a Blues game earlier in the year that went for about a minute (and still got it wrong btw) so you obviously don't want that but that should have been looked at longer.

Fact of the matter is.. the AFL clearly have morons running this and they need to be held accountable.

 

[WoodyPecker]

This sport is equivalent to WWE. Too many grey areas to be considered a legitimate competition.

 

[hawkman]

Even if it did we have no idea if it cost them the game. Play would have completely changed after that moment

 

[Baird]

Adelaide would’ve won regardless. They were better.

 

[Dav]

Even if it did we have no idea if it cost them the game. Play would have completely changed after that moment

With such little time in the game that goal decided the contest.

 

[Baird]

Even if it did we have no idea if it cost them the game. Play would have completely changed after that moment

Thank you. Why do people fail to realise this?

 

[Baird]

With such little time in the game that goal decided the contest.

There was 2 and a half minutes left, that’s plenty of time.

 

[hawkman]

With such little time in the game that goal decided the contest.

They was about 2 minutes left, plenty could have happened in that time

 

[Wojcinski]

****ing AFL Victorian bias

 

[Dirty Bird]

I give it 27 minutes until Port fans officially claim the victory like Missouri fans do for their 1990 college football defeat to Colorado when the refs handing Colorado a win on the final play.

They’re salty like that...

 

[Macpotata]

Even if it did we have no idea if it cost them the game. Play would have completely changed after that moment

So you're saying Adelaide would have won anyway. Cool. On the other side of that argument, Port could have also got another goal themselves. So your reasoning is flawed big time tbh.

You should work as a goal review specialist