- Mar 13, 2014
- 578
- 1,468
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Very disappointing. Where was this announced?We have nominated Barrett, not Rome
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Very disappointing. Where was this announced?We have nominated Barrett, not Rome
Very disappointing. Where was this announced?
Well that is just dumb. At least nominating Louie or Rome could work to get one in the rookie draft if they slide there.Link Below:
Prized pick up for grabs in bold trade move; surprise call over sons of guns: Draft Whispers
Prized pick up for grabs in bold trade move; surprise call over sons of guns: Draft Whisperswww.foxsports.com.au
"Despite the opportunity to commit to several father-son prospects ahead of the draft, Port Adelaide have decided against locking in any of Rome Burgoyne, Louie Montgomery, Ky Burgoyne and Oliver Francou."
It indicates they don't rate them and won't rookie them anyway I'd imagine.Well that is just dumb. At least nominating Louie or Rome could work to get one in the rookie draft if they slide there.
You are probably absolutely right about that but it does seem strange when both Rome and Louie looked pretty promising when they played for the Maggies. They are unlucky that they were in a strong draft year and we didn't have many list spots open. Trent Burgoyne was not a patch on Rome but he was rookied. The announcement also raises questions about where the recruiters see Benny Barrett in the draft. I'd be annoyed if we took him in the national draft given our final pick is slated to be at pick 45. There are more than a dozen players rated higher than Benny Barrett that will still be available in the draft at that point. I'm hoping he's only considered for the CAT B rookie draft.It indicates they don't rate them and won't rookie them anyway I'd imagine.
If they nominate them, they must list them. We'd be 100% certain to list Barrett if he gets through the main draft.You are probably absolutely right about that but it does seem strange when both Rome and Louie looked pretty promising when they played for the Maggies. They are unlucky that they were in a strong draft year and we didn't have many list spots open. Trent Burgoyne was not a patch on Rome but he was rookied. The announcement also raises questions about where the recruiters see Benny Barrett in the draft. I'd be annoyed if we took him in the national draft given our final pick is slated to be at pick 45. There are more than a dozen players rated higher than Benny Barrett that will still be available in the draft at that point. I'm hoping he's only considered for the CAT B rookie draft.
We clearly dont develop them as well as other clubs. Look at the father sons from the Brisbane dynastySo Port not nominating any father sons this draft.