Determinant
Moderator
- Jan 9, 2012
- 7,478
- 6,831
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- St Kilda
- Moderator
- #401
What we need most is a game day strategist
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
They'll be giving tickets away with apologies I imagine.Club will email, if yoyu are a member you'll get a headstart to buy, online. If not you'll have to wait longer for public sale. Should be able to get tkts though. Dont know exact time. Afl website will clarify end if the weekend when the matchups are known is my guess
We have so many issues.
Our defence is a shambles. Davis is clearly injured (I reckon he has a bad back) Williams and Wilson are light weights and have half a brain between them.
Our mids are great on paper but are one way runners with the exception of Ward and Scully not prepared to work hard enough.
Our forwards are cumbersome and pretty one dimensional. They lack creativity and don't really defend (although this area was better tonight).
Some of our best players last year were Mummy, Shaw and Stevie J. All three are shadows of their former selves. If Mummy and Shaw go on rest assured they will end the same way as Stevie next year.
Positives...Ward, Scully, Haynes all tried hard. Greene is elite but couldnt get his hands on it. Though Himmelberg was good, he is athletic and a point of difference also thought Hopper really tried hard and put his head in the hole. Lobb will get criticised but he defended as best he could.
As I've said before Leon needs help, these L Platers helping him aren't up to it. We are a Ferrari driven by Mr Magoo.
I think we have 2 game day analysts, saw it on the staff list once. Didn't we take one from the Bulldogs laat year as well? Not sure of the difference. Maybe the analysts just provide data to the coaches.What we need most is a game day strategist
Do they look back at the Melbourne game where we went smallA shitty night, but we are still odds on to play a PF at least. We've been better than Port and WC all season, sadly not the Crows.
I dont think much needs to change. We haven't had stable structures all year. I do think the trust and the intuition about teamates intentions is not easily built and it cant be just arbitarily created. A review if everyting is appropriate as always but caution is also sensible.
We push on to the end this year, and then go into the off season hoping for a better run next year is my view. The risk, and it's huge, in overreacting is it starts a downward spiral when quick and radical fixes dont work.
AgreeNot trying to cause offense with this post so please take it constructively.
I thought you guys outsmarted yourself in the first half. Right from the start you were not attacking your forward line. Chipping it around and slow build up. I think the commentators suggested it was so you dont get burnt on turnovers.
I thought this was really strange. You are a top 4 side. For much of the year flag favourites. Why didnt you back yourselves in? Thats how teams like Carlton should be playing GWS. Not how GWS should be playing.
Anyway good luck for the rest of the year.
Dawson simpson = heartAgree with most of this... Did they check the weather? Went in to tall.
You cannot play the 4 bigs. Cameron has been playing as a midfielder just because they don't want to drop one of the bigs. Mummy had been shite for ages. Give Lobb the ruck.
Not trying to cause offense with this post so please take it constructively.
I thought you guys outsmarted yourself in the first half. Right from the start you were not attacking your forward line. Chipping it around and slow build up. I think the commentators suggested it was so you dont get burnt on turnovers.
I thought this was really strange. You are a top 4 side. For much of the year flag favourites. Why didnt you back yourselves in? Thats how teams like Carlton should be playing GWS. Not how GWS should be playing.
Anyway good luck for the rest of the year.
Agreed the big lug did really when given a chance. He looks and says he's 100% fit as well.Dawson simpson = heart
Dawson Simpson = heart
Dawsom.Simpson = heart
On HUAWEI NXT-L09 using BigFooty.com mobile app
I agree we are too tall. The issue is in Lobb, cameron and patton you have 3 genuine tall options to play. Going small means dropping one of them which is probably going to create player welfare issues (look at the dogs and stringer). That said, cameron being injured means we are a little smaller, and if mummy is out we can go smaller again.I made this post elsewhere initially...
Cameron has an obsession with going tall when every other team is seeing the benefit of going small. Dropping SJ and bringing in Himmelberg, even when rain was forecast, is a prime example.
Guys like Rampe are playing a key position in defense and Richmond is playing a single KPF while we play Davis, Corr, Tomlinson and Haynes down one end and Cameron, Patton, Lobb and one of SJ/Himmelberg at the other.
If a team throws numbers around the contest we have no answer because we don’t have the midfield numbers; if a team gets a turnover we have no answer because we don’t have the foot speed. It wasn’t a coincidence that we looked our best when Cameron missed a couple of games late and we started being able to lock the ball into their forward line like they used last year.
IMO we need to drop Mumford (spent most of last night providing ineffective taps, fumbled balls, and smothering Giants players able to get their hands on the ball) and move Lobb into the ruck full time, then replace him and Cameron (injured, otherwise it’d be Himmelberg) with two small forward or midfield options. Fewer tall options also reduces the “bomb it in” epidemic that sees either an opposition mark (by good teams) or a spoil and clear (by any team).
Won’t happen though - IMO SJ will come in for Cameron, and while we’ll probably knock off Port or West Coast we’ll lose at the MCG to Geelong because we’ll be run off their feet again.
Examples from last night:
- We actually got our hands to the ball in contested situations really well. Shiel was great (at least initially). However by the time we'd worked our way through two or three handballs without clearing the pack, Adelaide still had another couple of players still standing to apply pressure.
- When clearing the ball from defense and bombing it long, we couldn't even contest the kicks half the time because our talls were playing one and a half to two kicks ahead of the football and aren't fast enough to cover the space.
- Adelaide could rebound the ball into the corridor with impunity because our guys are too slow to apply consistent pressure.
- After a turnover we'd react two seconds or so slower than Adelaide, so trail them all the way into their forward 50. The worst times it looked like a player would see if anyone else would chase the ball carrier first before deciding to commit, by which point it's too late.
it should be noted he was talking about how we came back after that second qtr and won the second halfI have watched Leon Cameron's Press Conference after last nights match in which he stated; he was pleased with the second half and the last two matches have really only come down to one very bad quarter for each match.
I thought this was too optimistic, as last night I considered us poor for most of the night and very poor for the second quarter.
My opinion was that we were a bit off the pace in the first quarter, third quarter we came back as a opening surprise but the Crows resumed their 'first quarter superiority' and the final quarter was both sides playing a somewhat faint accompli. As per many posting here even I thought even when we raised our intensity; the structure still seemed wrong around contested ball/'getting it out' and no plan b for no orange tsunami except bomb it long.
Are our problems more than just two bad quarters the last two games?
I have watched Leon Cameron's Press Conference after last nights match in which he stated; he was pleased with the second half and the last two matches have really only come down to one very bad quarter for each match.
I thought this was too optimistic, as last night I considered us poor for most of the night and very poor for the second quarter.
My opinion was that we were a bit off the pace in the first quarter
agree.....SMALLLLLLLLLSSSSS pleaseI'd love to keep all 3, they all bring something to the table but it's just not plausible to have them all playing forward.
If Jezza is out, which I presume is the case, then I'd like to see Taranto come in. If Mumford isn't 100% right, then bring in Dawson. And I know Himmelberg had a good game, but perhaps we'll need to consider bringing him out for Devon Smith (if he's right) or even Reid.
What's the news on Devon anyway? Does anyone know?