Doesn't matter what you say. At the end of the day, a player who can play more than one role just as well as a player who only plays one role will always be considered a better and more versatile player.
Hawthorn might have enough midfielders, but if Rioli were good enough, he'd be playing as a full time midfielder. The really good players should be able to go into the midfield when required and dominate.
In five years time, if Rioli starts in the FP and dominates, moves into the midfield and dominates there too, then he will be doing more than I expected of him.
At the moment, I can't see him dominating in the midfield. He might be a very good forward pocket player, but a player like Palmer will be able to be a very good player whether he plays forward, middle or back.
Umm... my point had nothing to do with your argument that he's better than Houli, my point was related to the comment that he needs to play midfield, which he doesn't. I don't see how being just a FP is such a bad idea. Fevola is just a FF. Does that make him average? Not really.